1/ sharing insights from Q3 2025 at @CrucibleCap - quantifying and qualifying our work
first up - our sourcing mix changed a bit. this quarter we augmented with research tools which drove outreach from 4% in Q2 to 31% in Q3.
inbound still biggest but 0 conversion to invested.

2/ here's what we actually invested in by deal source
investor intros are still the GOAT 🐐
the four deals we did in Q3 were all deals we hunted aggressively after getting a casual mention or intro from an investor or founder.
hunting > farming, takes work but pays off

3/ Q3 saw less top of funnel and higher conversion into invested deal - bar has gotten higher, we don't add anything to pipeline unless its investable (no vanity metrics / pipeline stuffing its stupid)
deal process was faster - we used SAFEs + side letter and "led" every deal


4/ we have to pick the best companies - how do we know we're doing that? i'm convinced capital velocity is the thing to measure in this market.
we don't use SAFEs at higher caps as a "mark up" but we count it here as a capital velocity event
velocity increasing 🚀

5/ double clicking on this:
- 8 of 20 companies have not raised any new capital since we invested.
- 2 had token generation events
- 2 raised priced rounds (one of them did that twice and will do it again in Q4)
- the three Q1 deals we did have had no velocity – this will be an interesting data point to go back and interrogate over time.
- quarter over quarter, we are backing higher velocity founders right before key inflection points, often we are the first >$1M check and then things take off.
- we closed one deal in on a SAFE at a $25M cap and two weeks later the co raised 2x the money on a SAFE at a $45M cap.
- we closed a deal on November 1st as the only institutional investor, another investor participated one week later at a much higher cap SAFE.
- two companies in our Q4 2025 cohort who raised at a $25M and $12M post-money cap are getting inundated with high quality institutional capital two weeks after we invested.
anecdotally, the average amount of time between capital events is compressing as we continue to invest.
if anyone has seen good visualizations of a portfolio’s capital velocity from other investors, please share!
@DarshanG_ @CrucibleCap i've also been scouring npm-stats, reddit forums and asking neoclouds, dco's, and other operators what they're using or testing in their stack. generally ML ops people, sys admins, or networking engineers who deal w messy plumbing
6/ winning a spot on the cap table
conviction and speed is everything.
of the 24 investments made to date and currently in process for Q4, we have been the lead or co-lead in 75% of them. our highest velocity deals were first meeting to wire in less than one week.
7/ right valuation and right size
on valuation at first check, steady quarter over quarter and invested at an average of $19M post money
agility benefits us - slower / larger firms have to invest at higher caps than us. 3 week wait for IC? bye bye! another on vacay? see ya.

8/ on size - target ownership is 5% or more
our Q4 2024 ownership was 3.4% - i was learning to size and fund was not fully raised. our Q3 2025 ownership >7% and blended average is ~5%.
pushing hard here - 10% goal next! brutal competition out there + mega funds 2x round sizes

9/ construct a balanced risk / reward portfolio
too early to quantify $, co-investor correlation interesting. across the 24 deals - there is no clear pattern of co-invest. one VC we had 4 deals in common, another non VC insto investor 3 deals.
10/ return capital
we will have liquidity in Q4 of 2026. we plan to recycle 100% of fees which was my goal.
we will recycle capital in a narrow window so we can stick to tight vintages since the categories we invest have their own 3-4 year cycles. need to duration match!
11/ raise capital
Fund II is >50% committed, will add 2-3 new LPs. i do double digit % GP commit (on top of 100% LP).
philosophy - i am first check *in size* into anything we do (venture, SPV, liquid, PE). i don't make $ until we distribute $. team gets top decile comp.
12/ i know everyone loves to shit on venture investors but it is not an easy game and you do have to love it. i have nothing but respect for firms who are on Fund 3 + and consistently returning $ to LPs.
it's equal parts art and science. hopefully this thread elucidates the science part a bit. at the end of the day, consistently returning $ is the only measure and i'm excited to have more data about that in a few years.
we use @attio for pipeline tracking and data, loyal user since 2018. fellow GPs, would love to trade notes on how you quantify and qualify what you do day to day.
@CrucibleCap is myself, @itsanhonour_, @kellyjgreer with a fractional CFO. we will hire 1-2 more in 2026!
15,97 N
60
Nội dung trên trang này được cung cấp bởi các bên thứ ba. Trừ khi có quy định khác, OKX không phải là tác giả của bài viết được trích dẫn và không tuyên bố bất kỳ bản quyền nào trong các tài liệu. Nội dung được cung cấp chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin và không thể hiện quan điểm của OKX. Nội dung này không nhằm chứng thực dưới bất kỳ hình thức nào và không được coi là lời khuyên đầu tư hoặc lời chào mời mua bán tài sản kỹ thuật số. Việc sử dụng AI nhằm cung cấp nội dung tóm tắt hoặc thông tin khác, nội dung do AI tạo ra có thể không chính xác hoặc không nhất quán. Vui lòng đọc bài viết trong liên kết để biết thêm chi tiết và thông tin. OKX không chịu trách nhiệm về nội dung được lưu trữ trên trang web của bên thứ ba. Việc nắm giữ tài sản kỹ thuật số, bao gồm stablecoin và NFT, có độ rủi ro cao và có thể biến động rất lớn. Bạn phải cân nhắc kỹ lưỡng xem việc giao dịch hoặc nắm giữ tài sản kỹ thuật số có phù hợp hay không dựa trên tình hình tài chính của bạn.

