5 designs, 5 paths to yield.
Smart capital isnāt just yield-seeking, itās risk-aware.

Stablecoin Yields Arenāt All Built the Same
Yield-bearing stablecoins are becoming a core part of DeFiās capital base. But not all yield is created equal and the mechanisms vary widely.
At @levelusd, reserves are routed through onchain lending markets. Others deploy capital into tokenized Treasuries. Some rely on synthetic hedging or rebasing mechanics.
Each design carries trade-offs: transparency, composability, scalability.
Over time, only a few have proven durable.
Hereās a breakdown of the five different models, and why the most resilient systems still center around one thing: lending.
1ļøā£ Lending-Backed Yield
Deposits go into protocols like @aave or @morpholabs. Borrowers pay interest. Yield flows to holders, either directly or via wrappers like slvlUSD.
ā Fully onchain
ā Variable but composable
ā No intermediaries
Level uses this model. For a reason.
2ļøā£ Tokenized Treasuries (RWA-Backed)
Reserves are parked in tokenized T-bills or similar TradFi instruments. Yield is streamed or rebased via custodians.
ā Predictable returns
ā Permissioned rails
ā Custody risk
TradFi-aligned, but can struggle to integrate with DeFi systems.
3ļøā£ Delta-Neutral Hedging
Backed by ETH, stETH or similar assets, paired with short perps to neutralize price exposure. Yield comes from funding rate arbitrage.
ā Onchain mechanics
ā High APY in bull runs
ā Complex and brittle
These work, until they donāt.
4ļøā£ Crypto-Collateralized & Algorithmic Stablecoins
These stablecoins often rely on crypto collateral and algorithmic design. Their yield tends to come from minting fees, borrowing interest, or token incentives.
ā Fully onchain and non-custodial
ā Can maintain peg with market incentives
ā Exposed to depeg risk and complex feedback loops
Volatility can significantly impact the stability and sustainability of this model.
5ļøā£ Vault Wrappers
The stablecoin itself remains fungible and money-like. Yield is opt-in via a secondary token (e.g. slvlUSD), which accrues interest from defined strategies.
ā Modular and transparent
ā Preserves usability
ā Frictionless integrations
This is the foundation of Levelās design.
The takeaway:
Yield isn't created equally, and the mechanism behind it matters.
When deciding where to allocate your capital, consider custody models, composability, and the volatility of different stablecoins.
For a protocol aiming to build an on-chain bank, only one mechanism consistently delivers battle-tested performance, transparency, and scale: lending yield.
Level š

46.645
0
Il contenuto di questa pagina ĆØ fornito da terze parti. Salvo diversa indicazione, OKX non ĆØ l'autore degli articoli citati e non rivendica alcun copyright sui materiali. Il contenuto ĆØ fornito solo a scopo informativo e non rappresenta le opinioni di OKX. Non intende essere un'approvazione di alcun tipo e non deve essere considerato un consiglio di investimento o una sollecitazione all'acquisto o alla vendita di asset digitali. Nella misura in cui l'IA generativa viene utilizzata per fornire riepiloghi o altre informazioni, tale contenuto generato dall'IA potrebbe essere impreciso o incoerente. Leggi l'articolo collegato per ulteriori dettagli e informazioni. OKX non ĆØ responsabile per i contenuti ospitati su siti di terze parti. Gli holding di asset digitali, tra cui stablecoin e NFT, comportano un elevato grado di rischio e possono fluttuare notevolmente. Dovresti valutare attentamente se effettuare il trading o detenere asset digitali ĆØ adatto a te alla luce della tua situazione finanziaria.

