5 designs, 5 paths to yield.
Smart capital isnât just yield-seeking, itâs risk-aware.

Stablecoin Yields Arenât All Built the Same
Yield-bearing stablecoins are becoming a core part of DeFiâs capital base. But not all yield is created equal and the mechanisms vary widely.
At @levelusd, reserves are routed through onchain lending markets. Others deploy capital into tokenized Treasuries. Some rely on synthetic hedging or rebasing mechanics.
Each design carries trade-offs: transparency, composability, scalability.
Over time, only a few have proven durable.
Hereâs a breakdown of the five different models, and why the most resilient systems still center around one thing: lending.
1ïžâŁ Lending-Backed Yield
Deposits go into protocols like @aave or @morpholabs. Borrowers pay interest. Yield flows to holders, either directly or via wrappers like slvlUSD.
â Fully onchain
â Variable but composable
â No intermediaries
Level uses this model. For a reason.
2ïžâŁ Tokenized Treasuries (RWA-Backed)
Reserves are parked in tokenized T-bills or similar TradFi instruments. Yield is streamed or rebased via custodians.
â Predictable returns
â Permissioned rails
â Custody risk
TradFi-aligned, but can struggle to integrate with DeFi systems.
3ïžâŁ Delta-Neutral Hedging
Backed by ETH, stETH or similar assets, paired with short perps to neutralize price exposure. Yield comes from funding rate arbitrage.
â Onchain mechanics
â High APY in bull runs
â Complex and brittle
These work, until they donât.
4ïžâŁ Crypto-Collateralized & Algorithmic Stablecoins
These stablecoins often rely on crypto collateral and algorithmic design. Their yield tends to come from minting fees, borrowing interest, or token incentives.
â Fully onchain and non-custodial
â Can maintain peg with market incentives
â Exposed to depeg risk and complex feedback loops
Volatility can significantly impact the stability and sustainability of this model.
5ïžâŁ Vault Wrappers
The stablecoin itself remains fungible and money-like. Yield is opt-in via a secondary token (e.g. slvlUSD), which accrues interest from defined strategies.
â Modular and transparent
â Preserves usability
â Frictionless integrations
This is the foundation of Levelâs design.
The takeaway:
Yield isn't created equally, and the mechanism behind it matters.
When deciding where to allocate your capital, consider custody models, composability, and the volatility of different stablecoins.
For a protocol aiming to build an on-chain bank, only one mechanism consistently delivers battle-tested performance, transparency, and scale: lending yield.
Level đ

46,64Â t.
0
TÀllÀ sivulla nÀytettÀvÀ sisÀltö on kolmansien osapuolten tarjoamaa. Ellei toisin mainita, OKX ei ole lainatun artikkelin / lainattujen artikkelien kirjoittaja, eikÀ OKX vÀitÀ olevansa materiaalin tekijÀnoikeuksien haltija. SisÀltö on tarkoitettu vain tiedoksi, eikÀ se edusta OKX:n nÀkemyksiÀ. SitÀ ei ole tarkoitettu minkÀÀnlaiseksi suositukseksi, eikÀ sitÀ tule pitÀÀ sijoitusneuvontana tai kehotuksena ostaa tai myydÀ digitaalisia varoja. SiltÀ osin kuin yhteenvetojen tai muiden tietojen tuottamiseen kÀytetÀÀn generatiivista tekoÀlyÀ, tÀllainen tekoÀlyn tuottama sisÀltö voi olla epÀtarkkaa tai epÀjohdonmukaista. Lue aiheesta lisÀtietoa linkitetystÀ artikkelista. OKX ei ole vastuussa kolmansien osapuolten sivustojen sisÀllöstÀ. Digitaalisten varojen, kuten vakaakolikoiden ja NFT:iden, omistukseen liittyy suuri riski, ja niiden arvo voi vaihdella merkittÀvÀsti. Sinun tulee huolellisesti harkita, sopiiko digitaalisten varojen treidaus tai omistus sinulle taloudellisessa tilanteessasi.

