5 designs, 5 paths to yield.
Smart capital isnât just yield-seeking, itâs risk-aware.

Stablecoin Yields Arenât All Built the Same
Yield-bearing stablecoins are becoming a core part of DeFiâs capital base. But not all yield is created equal and the mechanisms vary widely.
At @levelusd, reserves are routed through onchain lending markets. Others deploy capital into tokenized Treasuries. Some rely on synthetic hedging or rebasing mechanics.
Each design carries trade-offs: transparency, composability, scalability.
Over time, only a few have proven durable.
Hereâs a breakdown of the five different models, and why the most resilient systems still center around one thing: lending.
1ïžâŁ Lending-Backed Yield
Deposits go into protocols like @aave or @morpholabs. Borrowers pay interest. Yield flows to holders, either directly or via wrappers like slvlUSD.
â Fully onchain
â Variable but composable
â No intermediaries
Level uses this model. For a reason.
2ïžâŁ Tokenized Treasuries (RWA-Backed)
Reserves are parked in tokenized T-bills or similar TradFi instruments. Yield is streamed or rebased via custodians.
â Predictable returns
â Permissioned rails
â Custody risk
TradFi-aligned, but can struggle to integrate with DeFi systems.
3ïžâŁ Delta-Neutral Hedging
Backed by ETH, stETH or similar assets, paired with short perps to neutralize price exposure. Yield comes from funding rate arbitrage.
â Onchain mechanics
â High APY in bull runs
â Complex and brittle
These work, until they donât.
4ïžâŁ Crypto-Collateralized & Algorithmic Stablecoins
These stablecoins often rely on crypto collateral and algorithmic design. Their yield tends to come from minting fees, borrowing interest, or token incentives.
â Fully onchain and non-custodial
â Can maintain peg with market incentives
â Exposed to depeg risk and complex feedback loops
Volatility can significantly impact the stability and sustainability of this model.
5ïžâŁ Vault Wrappers
The stablecoin itself remains fungible and money-like. Yield is opt-in via a secondary token (e.g. slvlUSD), which accrues interest from defined strategies.
â Modular and transparent
â Preserves usability
â Frictionless integrations
This is the foundation of Levelâs design.
The takeaway:
Yield isn't created equally, and the mechanism behind it matters.
When deciding where to allocate your capital, consider custody models, composability, and the volatility of different stablecoins.
For a protocol aiming to build an on-chain bank, only one mechanism consistently delivers battle-tested performance, transparency, and scale: lending yield.
Level đ

46,65Â k
0
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX nâest pas lâauteur du ou des articles citĂ©s et ne revendique aucun droit dâauteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni Ă titre dâinformation uniquement et ne reprĂ©sente pas les opinions dâOKX. Il ne sâagit pas dâune approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas ĂȘtre considĂ©rĂ© comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation dâachat ou de vente dâactifs numĂ©riques. Dans la mesure oĂč lâIA gĂ©nĂ©rative est utilisĂ©e pour fournir des rĂ©sumĂ©s ou dâautres informations, ce contenu gĂ©nĂ©rĂ© par IA peut ĂȘtre inexact ou incohĂ©rent. Veuillez lire lâarticle associĂ© pour obtenir davantage de dĂ©tails et dâinformations. OKX nâest pas responsable du contenu hĂ©bergĂ© sur des sites tiers. La dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque Ă©levĂ© et leur valeur peut considĂ©rablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financiĂšre pour dĂ©terminer si le trading ou la dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques vous convient.

