5 designs, 5 paths to yield. Smart capital isn’t just yield-seeking, it’s risk-aware.
Stablecoin Yields Aren’t All Built the Same Yield-bearing stablecoins are becoming a core part of DeFi’s capital base. But not all yield is created equal and the mechanisms vary widely. At @levelusd, reserves are routed through onchain lending markets. Others deploy capital into tokenized Treasuries. Some rely on synthetic hedging or rebasing mechanics. Each design carries trade-offs: transparency, composability, scalability. Over time, only a few have proven durable. Here’s a breakdown of the five different models, and why the most resilient systems still center around one thing: lending. 1️⃣ Lending-Backed Yield Deposits go into protocols like @aave or @morpholabs. Borrowers pay interest. Yield flows to holders, either directly or via wrappers like slvlUSD. → Fully onchain → Variable but composable → No intermediaries Level uses this model. For a reason. 2️⃣ Tokenized Treasuries (RWA-Backed) Reserves are parked in tokenized T-bills or similar TradFi instruments. Yield is streamed or rebased via custodians. → Predictable returns → Permissioned rails → Custody risk TradFi-aligned, but can struggle to integrate with DeFi systems. 3️⃣ Delta-Neutral Hedging Backed by ETH, stETH or similar assets, paired with short perps to neutralize price exposure. Yield comes from funding rate arbitrage. → Onchain mechanics → High APY in bull runs → Complex and brittle These work, until they don’t. 4️⃣ Crypto-Collateralized & Algorithmic Stablecoins These stablecoins often rely on crypto collateral and algorithmic design. Their yield tends to come from minting fees, borrowing interest, or token incentives. → Fully onchain and non-custodial → Can maintain peg with market incentives → Exposed to depeg risk and complex feedback loops Volatility can significantly impact the stability and sustainability of this model. 5️⃣ Vault Wrappers The stablecoin itself remains fungible and money-like. Yield is opt-in via a secondary token (e.g. slvlUSD), which accrues interest from defined strategies. → Modular and transparent → Preserves usability → Frictionless integrations This is the foundation of Level’s design. The takeaway: Yield isn't created equally, and the mechanism behind it matters. When deciding where to allocate your capital, consider custody models, composability, and the volatility of different stablecoins. For a protocol aiming to build an on-chain bank, only one mechanism consistently delivers battle-tested performance, transparency, and scale: lending yield. Level 🆙
46,63 rb
0
Konten pada halaman ini disediakan oleh pihak ketiga. Kecuali dinyatakan lain, OKX bukanlah penulis artikel yang dikutip dan tidak mengklaim hak cipta atas materi tersebut. Konten ini disediakan hanya untuk tujuan informasi dan tidak mewakili pandangan OKX. Konten ini tidak dimaksudkan sebagai dukungan dalam bentuk apa pun dan tidak dapat dianggap sebagai nasihat investasi atau ajakan untuk membeli atau menjual aset digital. Sejauh AI generatif digunakan untuk menyediakan ringkasan atau informasi lainnya, konten yang dihasilkan AI mungkin tidak akurat atau tidak konsisten. Silakan baca artikel yang terkait untuk informasi lebih lanjut. OKX tidak bertanggung jawab atas konten yang dihosting di situs pihak ketiga. Kepemilikan aset digital, termasuk stablecoin dan NFT, melibatkan risiko tinggi dan dapat berfluktuasi secara signifikan. Anda perlu mempertimbangkan dengan hati-hati apakah trading atau menyimpan aset digital sesuai untuk Anda dengan mempertimbangkan kondisi keuangan Anda.