The "token not needed" meme is an entirely obsolete way to think about Chainlink. Why?
Because they built a payment abstraction layer (PAL) to convert any form of value into LINK tokens.
So, the token isn't needed *by design* to make it as *easy* as possible for end users, applications, TradFi institutions, to pay in all sorts of different ways:
Bank accounts, stablecoins, other gas tokens, credit cards, whatever. Any of it can become LINK.
That is simply about removing payment friction.
The easier it is to pay for something, the easier it is to get people to actually pay for it.
Therefore, the goal of the token isn't to make it *needed* in the context of how the protocol functions by shoehorning in extra, clunky steps.
The goal is to make the token *wanted* purely from the perspective of the eventual value distribution it gets from the protocol being widely adopted.
See this post from @ChainLinkGod:
The end-state for crypto tokens is protocol equity.
A digital asset that serves as a claim on the future positive cash flows of a blockchain-based protocol.
That’s it, this is how tokens accrue value, no ponzinomics or mental gymnastics required.
The end-state for crypto tokens is protocol equity
A digital asset that serves as a claim on the future positive cash flows of a blockchain-based protocol
That’s it, this is how tokens accrue value, no ponzinomics or mental gymnastics required
1. Solve a real problem for a large addressable market
2. Monetize adoption as dominant market share is achieved
3. Accrue value to token via a dividend (staking reward) and/or a buy-back (token burn)
Not every protocol will succeed and become cash flow positive, but those that do, present the largest opportunity for token investors
This has largely not occurred to date due to the openly and aggressively hostile U.S. regulatory environment toward crypto
Projects that fly too close to the sun risk putting themselves in the direct cross-hairs of government agencies looking to make an example of an industry they (falsely) perceive as a threat
Hence, instead of protocol equity, we have “utility tokens” or “governance tokens” to mask what the ultimate end goal is
This is obviously unsustainable, hence the extreme volatility as people don’t know how to price these assets, while raw speculation keeps the market alive
Thankfully, we are starting to see a shift in attitude within the U.S., mainly from politicians who are taking note of who is writing the major checks this election cycle
Once the regulatory environment clears up, however long that may take, we can finally enter the next stage of crypto’s evolution:
Treating tokens for what they actually are, tools for fundraising and economic alignment
Digital assets with mechanisms for value accrual that have been tried and true in capital markets for centuries
The uncertainty in all of this is your alpha, good luck out there

23.87K
141
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.