
BNT
Bancor 价格
$0.66290
+$0.012600
(+1.93%)
过去 24 小时的价格变化

您感觉 BNT 今天会涨还是会跌?
您可以通过点赞或点踩来分享对该币种今天的涨跌预测
投票并查看结果
免责声明
本页面的社交内容 (包括由 LunarCrush 提供支持的推文和社交统计数据) 均来自第三方,并按“原样”提供,仅供参考。本文内容不代表对任何数字货币或投资的认可或推荐,也未获得欧易授权或撰写,也不代表我们的观点。我们不保证所显示的用户生成内容的准确性或可靠性。本文不应被解释为财务或投资建议。在做出投资决策之前,评估您的投资经验、财务状况、投资目标和风险承受能力并咨询独立财务顾问至关重要。过去的表现并不代表未来的结果。您的投资价值可能会波动,您可能无法收回您投资的金额。您对自己的投资选择自行承担全部责任,我们对因使用本信息而造成的任何损失或损害不承担任何责任。提供外部网站链接是为了用户方便,并不意味着对其内容的认可或控制。
请参阅我们的 使用条款 和 风险警告,了解更多详情。通过使用第三方网站(“第三方网站”),您同意对第三方网站的任何使用均受第三方网站条款的约束和管辖。除非书面明确说明,否则欧易及其关联方(“OKX”)与第三方网站的所有者或运营商没有任何关联。您同意欧易对您使用第三方网站而产生的任何损失、损害和任何其他后果不承担任何责任。请注意,使用第三方网站可能会导致您的资产损失或贬值。本产品可能无法在所有司法管辖区提供或适用。
请参阅我们的 使用条款 和 风险警告,了解更多详情。通过使用第三方网站(“第三方网站”),您同意对第三方网站的任何使用均受第三方网站条款的约束和管辖。除非书面明确说明,否则欧易及其关联方(“OKX”)与第三方网站的所有者或运营商没有任何关联。您同意欧易对您使用第三方网站而产生的任何损失、损害和任何其他后果不承担任何责任。请注意,使用第三方网站可能会导致您的资产损失或贬值。本产品可能无法在所有司法管辖区提供或适用。
Bancor 市场信息
市值
市值是通过流通总应量与最新价格相乘进行计算。市值 = 当前流通量 × 最新价
流通总量
目前该代币在市场流通的数量
市值排行
该资产的市值排名
历史最高价
该代币在交易历史中的最高价格
历史最低价
该代币在交易历史中的最低价格
24 小时最高
$0.68520
24 小时最低
$0.64030
历史最高价
$10.9800
-93.97% (-$10.3171)
最后更新日期:2018年1月12日 (UTC+8)
历史最低价
$0.10800
+513.79% (+$0.55490)
最后更新日期:2020年3月13日 (UTC+8)
Bancor 动态资讯
以下内容源自 。

Bancor
在巴尔干加密2025见 🇦🇱
@MBRichardson87 在地拉那讨论去中心化交易所基础设施、链上流动性和去中心化金融的下一个前沿。
以下是找到他的地方 🧵


Balkans Crypto
我们很高兴欢迎 @MBRichardson87 ,@Bancor 的项目负责人,加入巴尔干地区加密2025舞台。
让我们一起欢迎 Dr. Mark Bentley Richardson——一位从研究科学家转型为DeFi创新者的项目负责人。他自2021年进入区块链领域以来,领导了Carbon DeFi的开发,这是一项尖端协议,能够在去中心化交易所中实现策略特定的流动性。拥有墨尔本大学的博士学位,Richardson博士将科学严谨性带入Web3,倡导创新、用户安全以及去中心化的核心原则。
推动DeFi的下一次进化——精准、强大且以用户为中心。

1.64万
18



Haseeb >|<
现在似乎是重新提起这个话题的好时机。
加密货币并没有先发优势。如果你曾经觉得自己来得太晚——几乎所有的赢家都曾有过同样的恐惧。
所以不要害怕竞争。竞争是你所在市场值得争取的标志。👇

Haseeb >|<
我越来越相信加密货币并没有真正的先发优势。
例如:
Uniswap 不是第一个 AMM(Bancor)
Coinbase/Binance 不是第一个交易所(Mt. Gox, Bitstamp)
Tether 不是第一个稳定币(bitUSD)
Solana 不是第一个高性能智能合约平台(EOS)
Hyperliquid 不是第一个永续合约 DEX(dYdX)
AAVE 不是第一个链上货币市场(Compound)
Avalanche 不是第一个链中链(Cosmos Hub)
Base 不是第一个 EVM rollup(Arbitrum)
18.27万
353

PANews
2025年5月20日,去中心化交易所(DEX)先驱Bancor向美国纽约南区地方法院提交了一份重磅诉状,指控行业巨头Uniswap Labs及其基金会未经授权使用其2017年专利的“恒定乘积自动做市商”(CPAMM)技术,索求巨额赔偿。Bancor宣称,这项诞生于2016年的技术是DeFi交易的基石,而Uniswap自2018年上线以来,凭借此技术攫取了数十亿美元利润。次日,Uniswap Labs反击,斥责诉讼为“博取关注”的闹剧,称其在监管风口浪尖上不过是“最愚蠢的挑衅”。这场围绕CPAMM的专利战,不仅是Bancor与Uniswap的正面交锋,更可能是DeFi行业知识产权规则的转折点。技术归属、开源精神与商业利益在链上世界碰撞,究竟谁将定义DeFi的未来?让我们走进这场代码与法庭交织的风暴。
CPAMM:DeFi的数学魔法与争议根源
要理解这场诉讼的核心,离不开“恒定乘积自动做市商”(CPAMM)的技术本质。CPAMM的核心公式——x * y = k——简单却颠覆性:x和y分别代表流动性池中两种资产的数量,k为常数,交易后池内资产比例自动调整价格,取代了传统交易所的订单簿。这种机制让去中心化交易无需中介,成本低廉,效率惊人,成为DeFi的命脉。
Bancor声称,CPAMM是其2016年的原创发明。2017年1月,Bancor提交专利申请,同年6月推出全球首款基于CPAMM的DEX——Bancor Protocol,开启了DeFi交易的先河。白皮书、专利申请和协议上线,Bancor用代码和法律双重布局,试图锁定这一技术的归属。然而,2018年11月,Uniswap横空出世,其v1协议同样基于x * y = k公式,迅速凭借简洁设计和社区驱动席卷市场。截至2025年,Uniswap累计交易量突破3万亿美元,总锁仓价值(TVL)近50亿美元,稳坐DEX龙头宝座,而Bancor仅以5900万美元TVL排名第142(DeFiLlama数据)。
Bancor在诉状中指控,Uniswap从v1到最新的v4协议,持续使用其专利技术,未经授权且拒绝合作。Bancor项目负责人Mark Richardson直言:“八年来,Uniswap未经许可使用我们的发明,借此与我们竞争,我们必须采取行动。”诉讼由Bprotocol基金会和原始开发者LocalCoin Ltd.联合发起,寻求赔偿Uniswap Labs的“无证使用”及Uniswap基金会的“诱导侵权”。这场技术归属之争,表面是专利权的较量,实则触及DeFi的核心问题:创新如何在开源与商业化之间平衡?
Bancor与Uniswap:从先驱到王者的恩怨纠葛
Bancor与Uniswap的恩怨,是一部DeFi进化史的缩影。2016年,Bancor率先提出CPAMM理念,试图用智能合约取代中心化交易所的繁琐机制。其白皮书勾勒了一个无需中介、完全链上的交易乌托邦,吸引了早期区块链社区的热捧。2017年的Bancor Protocol上线,被誉为“DeFi的开山之作”,但其复杂的设计和高昂的Gas费用限制了用户增长。
Uniswap的出现改变了游戏规则。2018年,创始人Hayden Adams推出v1协议,以极简UI和高效的链上体验迅速俘获用户。Uniswap不仅优化了CPAMM的实现,还通过开源代码和社区治理激发了开发者热潮。v2、v3乃至2025年初的v4迭代,进一步巩固了其市场霸主地位。Uniswap的成功离不开CPAMM的数学优雅,但Bancor坚称,这份优雅源自其专利。
市场数据的对比更凸显两者的差距。Uniswap日交易量接近38亿美元,远超Bancor的37.8万美元(DeFiLlama,2025年5月20日)。Uniswap的UNI代币虽在诉讼消息后下跌近2%至5.87美元,但其生态依然稳固。反观Bancor,其BNT代币价格低迷,市场影响力远不及昔日辉煌。Bancor此次诉讼,是否是试图借法律翻盘的无奈之举?还是对DeFi创新规则的正当捍卫?答案或许藏在Uniswap的回应中。
Uniswap的“硬刚”与DeFi的开源之辩
面对Bancor的指控,Uniswap并未保持沉默。5月21日,Hayden Adams在X平台发文,称诉讼“可能是见过最蠢的事情”,并表示“直到律师告诉我我们赢了,我都不会再理它”。Uniswap Labs进一步驳斥,称Bancor是在美国加密监管趋严的背景下“博取关注”,试图利用诉讼扭转市场劣势。
Uniswap的强硬态度,背后是对DeFi开源精神的捍卫。CPAMM的核心公式x * y = k并非复杂数学,其灵感甚至可追溯至Vitalik Buterin的早期讨论。Uniswap可能辩称,Bancor的专利缺乏独创性,或其实现方式与Bancor专利的具体主张存在差异。更重要的是,DeFi的崛起依赖开源文化,代码共享与迭代是行业创新的基石。Bancor试图以传统专利法约束链上技术,是否违背了Web3的去中心化精神?
Bancor则反驳,知识产权保护是激励创新的必要条件。Mark Richardson警告:“如果Uniswap这样的公司可以不受约束地使用他人技术,整个DeFi行业的创新将受损。”Bancor强调,其专利涵盖了CPAMM在链上交易的具体实现,而非抽象数学公式,具备法律上的独创性和可执行性。这场争论将考验法院如何在区块链的去中心化语境中解读传统专利法。
法律与市场的双重博弈
这场诉讼的法律前景充满变数。Bancor需证明其2017年专利的独创性,并证实Uniswap的实现直接侵犯了专利主张。Uniswap则可能挑战专利的有效性,强调CPAMM的理念在2016年前已有公开讨论,或指出其协议的独特优化不构成侵权。此外,DeFi的去中心化特性为诉讼增添复杂性:智能合约运行于全球节点,专利权的地域性如何适用?法院是否会认可链上技术的专利可执行性?
市场反应同样值得关注。诉讼消息公布后,UNI价格短暂下跌3.74%至5.71美元,交易量下降14.18%,反映投资者对不确定性的担忧。Bancor则借诉讼重回舆论焦点,BNT价格出现小幅波动,但整体市场表现依然疲软。若Bancor胜诉,可能获得巨额赔偿,并迫使其他DEX重新评估技术授权成本;若Uniswap胜诉,DeFi的开源文化将进一步巩固,但也可能削弱专利激励创新的动力。
监管背景为诉讼增添了另一层阴影。2024年9月,Bancor因在美国缺乏管辖权,成功规避了一起证券集体诉讼。2025年2月,Uniswap则摆脱了SEC的调查,巩固了其合规形象。在稳定币法案取得突破的2025年,监管机构对DeFi的关注日益加剧,这场诉讼可能成为测试区块链知识产权边界的试金石。
DeFi的未来:开源还是专利?
Bancor与Uniswap的专利战,不仅仅是两家DEX的恩怨,更是DeFi行业在技术、法律与伦理层面的十字路口。参考Amber Group通过MIA重塑AI+加密叙事,Bancor可能希望借诉讼重振品牌,扭转市场颓势。类似Visa通过链上战略融入Web3,Bancor试图以专利为杠杆,在DeFi生态中重新定义其角色。然而,专利战的风险在于疏远社区——DeFi用户更倾向于支持开源项目,而非传统法律的捍卫者。
从更广视角看,这场诉讼可能重塑DeFi的创新模式。若专利成为主流,开发者需在技术开发前评估法律风险,可能抑制初创项目的活力;若开源文化占上风,早期创新者的回报机制可能受限,影响长期研发投入。X平台上的讨论反映了社区的分裂:部分用户支持Bancor维护知识产权,另一些则认为其举动背叛了DeFi的去中心化初心。
Bancor的诉讼还可能引发连锁反应。其他DEX,如SushiSwap或Curve,是否也面临类似专利风险?CPAMM的广泛应用是否会催生更多法律纠纷?法律分析师预测,若Bancor胜诉,可能推动DeFi行业制定更清晰的知识产权框架;若败诉,专利在区块链领域的适用性将受到质疑。
结语:链上世界的规则博弈
Bancor对Uniswap的专利诉讼,如同一颗投入DeFi湖面的石子,激起技术、法律与文化的层层涟漪。CPAMM的数学之美,曾让去中心化交易从梦想照进现实;如今,它却成为法庭上的争议焦点。在开源精神与商业利益的拉扯中,Bancor与Uniswap的较量不仅关乎赔偿金额,更关乎DeFi的灵魂:创新应如何定义、保护与传承?
这场诉讼的结果,或许将决定DeFi是继续拥抱无边界的代码共享,还是步入专利壁垒的商业化轨道。无论是开发者、投资者还是链上用户,我们都在见证一个新时代的规则书写。Bancor与Uniswap的战火已燃,你站在哪一边?未来,又将由谁来定义?


7.22万
0
BNT 计算器


Bancor 价格表现 (美元)
Bancor 当前价格为 $0.66290。Bancor 的价格在过去 24 小时内上涨了 +1.94%。目前,Bancor 市值排名为第 0 名,实时市值为 $7,587.81万,流通供应量为 114,602,107 BNT,最大供应量为 114,602,107 BNT。我们会实时更新 Bancor/USD 的价格。
今日
+$0.012600
+1.93%
7 天
-$0.05080
-7.12%
30 天
+$0.20510
+44.80%
3 个月
+$0.20100
+43.51%
关于 Bancor (BNT)
此评级是欧易从不同来源收集的汇总评级,仅供一般参考。欧易不保证评级的质量或准确性。欧易无意提供 (i) 投资建议或推荐;(ii) 购买、出售或持有数字资产的要约或招揽;(iii) 财务、会计、法律或税务建议。包括稳定币和 NFT 的数字资产容易受到市场波动的影响,风险较高,波动较大,可能会贬值甚至变得一文不值。数字资产的价格和性能不受保证,且可能会发生变化,恕不另行通知。您的数字资产不受潜在损失保险的保障。 历史回报并不代表未来回报。欧易不保证任何回报、本金或利息的偿还。欧易不提供投资或资产建议。您应该根据自身的财务状况仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。具体情况请咨询您的专业法务、税务或投资人士。
展开更多
- 官网
- 白皮书
- Github
- 区块浏览器
关于第三方网站
关于第三方网站
通过使用第三方网站(“第三方网站”),您同意对第三方网站的任何使用均受第三方网站条款的约束和管辖。除非书面明确说明,否则 OKX 及其关联方(“OKX”)与第三方网站的所有者或运营商没有任何关联。您同意 OKX 对您使用第三方网站而产生的任何损失、损害和任何其他后果不承担任何责任。请注意,使用第三方网站可能会导致您的资产损失或贬值。
Bancor 常见问题
Bancor 今天值多少钱?
目前,一个 Bancor 价值是 $0.66290。如果您想要了解 Bancor 价格走势与行情洞察,那么这里就是您的最佳选择。在欧易探索最新的 Bancor 图表,进行专业交易。
数字货币是什么?
数字货币,例如 Bancor 是在称为区块链的公共分类账上运行的数字资产。了解有关欧易上提供的数字货币和代币及其不同属性的更多信息,其中包括实时价格和实时图表。
数字货币是什么时候开始的?
由于 2008 年金融危机,人们对去中心化金融的兴趣激增。比特币作为去中心化网络上的安全数字资产提供了一种新颖的解决方案。从那时起,许多其他代币 (例如 Bancor) 也诞生了。
Bancor 的价格今天会涨吗?
查看 Bancor 价格预测页面,预测未来价格,帮助您设定价格目标。
ESG 披露
ESG (环境、社会和治理) 法规针对数字资产,旨在应对其环境影响 (如高能耗挖矿)、提升透明度,并确保合规的治理实践。使数字代币行业与更广泛的可持续发展和社会目标保持一致。这些法规鼓励遵循相关标准,以降低风险并提高数字资产的可信度。
资产详情
名称
OKcoin Europe LTD
相关法人机构识别编码
54930069NLWEIGLHXU42
代币名称
Bancor
共识机制
Bancor is present on the following networks: Ethereum, Gnosis Chain, Solana.
The crypto-asset's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, introduced with The Merge in 2022, replaces mining with validator staking. Validators must stake at least 32 ETH every block a validator is randomly chosen to propose the next block. Once proposed the other validators verify the blocks integrity. The network operates on a slot and epoch system, where a new block is proposed every 12 seconds, and finalization occurs after two epochs (~12.8 minutes) using Casper-FFG. The Beacon Chain coordinates validators, while the fork-choice rule (LMD-GHOST) ensures the chain follows the heaviest accumulated validator votes. Validators earn rewards for proposing and verifying blocks, but face slashing for malicious behavior or inactivity. PoS aims to improve energy efficiency, security, and scalability, with future upgrades like Proto-Danksharding enhancing transaction efficiency.
Gnosis Chain – Consensus Mechanism Gnosis Chain employs a dual-layer structure to balance scalability and security, using Proof of Stake (PoS) for its core consensus and transaction finality. Core Components: Two-Layer Structure Layer 1: Gnosis Beacon Chain The Gnosis Beacon Chain operates on a Proof of Stake (PoS) mechanism, acting as the security and consensus backbone. Validators stake GNO tokens on the Beacon Chain and validate transactions, ensuring network security and finality. Layer 2: Gnosis xDai Chain Gnosis xDai Chain processes transactions and dApp interactions, providing high-speed, low-cost transactions. Layer 2 transaction data is finalized on the Gnosis Beacon Chain, creating an integrated framework where Layer 1 ensures security and finality, and Layer 2 enhances scalability. Validator Role and Staking Validators on the Gnosis Beacon Chain stake GNO tokens and participate in consensus by validating blocks. This setup ensures that validators have an economic interest in maintaining the security and integrity of both the Beacon Chain (Layer 1) and the xDai Chain (Layer 2). Cross-Layer Security Transactions on Layer 2 are ultimately finalized on Layer 1, providing security and finality to all activities on the Gnosis Chain. This architecture allows Gnosis Chain to combine the speed and cost efficiency of Layer 2 with the security guarantees of a PoS-secured Layer 1, making it suitable for both high-frequency applications and secure asset management.
Solana uses a unique combination of Proof of History (PoH) and Proof of Stake (PoS) to achieve high throughput, low latency, and robust security. Here’s a detailed explanation of how these mechanisms work: Core Concepts 1. Proof of History (PoH): Time-Stamped Transactions: PoH is a cryptographic technique that timestamps transactions, creating a historical record that proves that an event has occurred at a specific moment in time. Verifiable Delay Function: PoH uses a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) to generate a unique hash that includes the transaction and the time it was processed. This sequence of hashes provides a verifiable order of events, enabling the network to efficiently agree on the sequence of transactions. 2. Proof of Stake (PoS): Validator Selection: Validators are chosen to produce new blocks based on the number of SOL tokens they have staked. The more tokens staked, the higher the chance of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. Delegation: Token holders can delegate their SOL tokens to validators, earning rewards proportional to their stake while enhancing the network's security. Consensus Process 1. Transaction Validation: Transactions are broadcast to the network and collected by validators. Each transaction is validated to ensure it meets the network’s criteria, such as having correct signatures and sufficient funds. 2. PoH Sequence Generation: A validator generates a sequence of hashes using PoH, each containing a timestamp and the previous hash. This process creates a historical record of transactions, establishing a cryptographic clock for the network. 3. Block Production: The network uses PoS to select a leader validator based on their stake. The leader is responsible for bundling the validated transactions into a block. The leader validator uses the PoH sequence to order transactions within the block, ensuring that all transactions are processed in the correct order. 4. Consensus and Finalization: Other validators verify the block produced by the leader validator. They check the correctness of the PoH sequence and validate the transactions within the block. Once the block is verified, it is added to the blockchain. Validators sign off on the block, and it is considered finalized. Security and Economic Incentives 1. Incentives for Validators: Block Rewards: Validators earn rewards for producing and validating blocks. These rewards are distributed in SOL tokens and are proportional to the validator’s stake and performance. Transaction Fees: Validators also earn transaction fees from the transactions included in the blocks they produce. These fees provide an additional incentive for validators to process transactions efficiently. 2. Security: Staking: Validators must stake SOL tokens to participate in the consensus process. This staking acts as collateral, incentivizing validators to act honestly. If a validator behaves maliciously or fails to perform, they risk losing their staked tokens. Delegated Staking: Token holders can delegate their SOL tokens to validators, enhancing network security and decentralization. Delegators share in the rewards and are incentivized to choose reliable validators. 3. Economic Penalties: Slashing: Validators can be penalized for malicious behavior, such as double-signing or producing invalid blocks. This penalty, known as slashing, results in the loss of a portion of the staked tokens, discouraging dishonest actions.
奖励机制与相应费用
Bancor is present on the following networks: Ethereum, Gnosis Chain, Solana.
The crypto-asset's PoS system secures transactions through validator incentives and economic penalties. Validators stake at least 32 ETH and earn rewards for proposing blocks, attesting to valid ones, and participating in sync committees. Rewards are paid in newly issued ETH and transaction fees. Under EIP-1559, transaction fees consist of a base fee, which is burned to reduce supply, and an optional priority fee (tip) paid to validators. Validators face slashing if they act maliciously and incur penalties for inactivity. This system aims to increase security by aligning incentives while making the crypto-asset's fee structure more predictable and deflationary during high network activity.
The Gnosis Chain’s incentive and fee models encourage both validator participation and network accessibility, using a dual-token system to maintain low transaction costs and effective staking rewards. Incentive Mechanisms: Staking Rewards for Validators GNO Rewards: Validators earn staking rewards in GNO tokens for their participation in consensus and securing the network. Delegation Model: GNO holders who do not operate validator nodes can delegate their GNO tokens to validators, allowing them to share in staking rewards and encouraging broader participation in network security. Dual-Token Model GNO: Used for staking, governance, and validator rewards, GNO aligns long-term network security incentives with token holders’ economic interests. xDai: Serves as the primary transaction currency, providing stable and low-cost transactions. The use of a stable token (xDai) for fees minimizes volatility and offers predictable costs for users and developers. Applicable Fees: Transaction Fees in xDai Users pay transaction fees in xDai, the stable fee token, making costs affordable and predictable. This model is especially suited for high-frequency applications and dApps where low transaction fees are essential. xDai transaction fees are redistributed to validators as part of their compensation, aligning their rewards with network activity. Delegated Staking Rewards Through delegated staking, GNO holders can earn a share of staking rewards by delegating their tokens to active validators, promoting user participation in network security without requiring direct involvement in consensus operations.
Solana uses a combination of Proof of History (PoH) and Proof of Stake (PoS) to secure its network and validate transactions. Here’s a detailed explanation of the incentive mechanisms and applicable fees: Incentive Mechanisms 4. Validators: Staking Rewards: Validators are chosen based on the number of SOL tokens they have staked. They earn rewards for producing and validating blocks, which are distributed in SOL. The more tokens staked, the higher the chances of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. Transaction Fees: Validators earn a portion of the transaction fees paid by users for the transactions they include in the blocks. This provides an additional financial incentive for validators to process transactions efficiently and maintain the network's integrity. 5. Delegators: Delegated Staking: Token holders who do not wish to run a validator node can delegate their SOL tokens to a validator. In return, delegators share in the rewards earned by the validators. This encourages widespread participation in securing the network and ensures decentralization. 6. Economic Security: Slashing: Validators can be penalized for malicious behavior, such as producing invalid blocks or being frequently offline. This penalty, known as slashing, involves the loss of a portion of their staked tokens. Slashing deters dishonest actions and ensures that validators act in the best interest of the network. Opportunity Cost: By staking SOL tokens, validators and delegators lock up their tokens, which could otherwise be used or sold. This opportunity cost incentivizes participants to act honestly to earn rewards and avoid penalties. Fees Applicable on the Solana Blockchain 7. Transaction Fees: Low and Predictable Fees: Solana is designed to handle a high throughput of transactions, which helps keep fees low and predictable. The average transaction fee on Solana is significantly lower compared to other blockchains like Ethereum. Fee Structure: Fees are paid in SOL and are used to compensate validators for the resources they expend to process transactions. This includes computational power and network bandwidth. 8. Rent Fees: State Storage: Solana charges rent fees for storing data on the blockchain. These fees are designed to discourage inefficient use of state storage and encourage developers to clean up unused state. Rent fees help maintain the efficiency and performance of the network. 9. Smart Contract Fees: Execution Costs: Similar to transaction fees, fees for deploying and interacting with smart contracts on Solana are based on the computational resources required. This ensures that users are charged proportionally for the resources they consume.
信息披露时间段的开始日期
2024-06-01
信息披露时间段的结束日期
2025-06-01
能源报告
能源消耗
763.78197 (kWh/a)
能源消耗来源与评估体系
The energy consumption of this asset is aggregated across multiple components:
To determine the energy consumption of a token, the energy consumption of the network(s) ethereum, gnosis_chain, solana is calculated first. For the energy consumption of the token, a fraction of the energy consumption of the network is attributed to the token, which is determined based on the activity of the crypto-asset within the network. When calculating the energy consumption, the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) is used - if available - to determine all implementations of the asset in scope. The mappings are updated regularly, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation.
BNT 计算器


社媒平台热度