"Tokens are not securities, but commodities"
Do you know what this means? There are countless people outraged that certain exchanges and projects have been deemed securities by the SEC.
Both the exchanges and the project teams do not acknowledge that tokens are securities; they are commodities.
If it is a security:
You are investing in a financial product with expected returns, and there are legal rights protecting you (equity, dividends, disclosures, claims, etc.).
Legally bound by securities regulatory bodies like the SEC.
The project team must:
- Disclose information truthfully (white papers/financials/project progress)
- Protect investor rights (anti-fraud)
- Accept the risk of collective lawsuits from investors
Investors have:
- Clear "rights" — such as voting rights, dividend rights, liquidation rights
- The ability to claim compensation in case of fraud
If it is a commodity:
Then it is like buying a bottle of water or an apple at the supermarket — you pay for it, but no one promises that it will appreciate in value or generate returns in the future.
No need to disclose project progress.
No obligation to protect "holder rights."
The project team has almost zero legal responsibility.
Investors have no substantial rights protection.
So why do project teams insist that they are "not securities"?
Because once they admit they are securities, they have to bear a series of legal responsibilities and risks.
What does this mean for investors?
✅ It means you are not an "investor"; you are just a "consumer who bought a virtual commodity":
If the project fails, you have no right to hold anyone accountable.
If the roadmap is delayed, no one compensates you.
You can only hope that "someone will take over."
You cannot share in the team's profits or future dividends.
Even if the team sells all the tokens and runs away, you cannot seek legal recourse (the law does not support it).
A sarcastic fact:
Many project token promotional phrases: "empowerment," "participate in the ecosystem," "holding means participating in governance," "future shared profits"...👉 Sound like securities, but the official stance is: "This is just community incentive, not a security, and does not promise returns."
This is a typical language packaging to legally evade regulation.
⚖️ So why is the SEC focusing on these projects?
Because the SEC believes many projects "clearly are securities in substance, yet pretend to be commodities or community tokens," constituting illegal securities issuance.
This is also the reason why projects like Ripple (XRP), Solana (SOL), ADA, MATIC, etc., are classified as "potential securities."
In summary:
"Tokens are commodities" = You bought a virtual commodity that cannot be returned, cannot be claimed, cannot generate dividends, and cannot assert rights; all investment is your own responsibility.
Show original21.53K
6
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.