I’m in Buenos Aires right now at the DeFi Security Summit, where I joined a panel on AI and Web3 security along with @blocksec (EigenLabs), @ChanniGreenwall (Olympix), @jack__sanford (Sherlock), and @nicowaisman (Xbow). What not long ago felt like a “distant future” is now being discussed as a very concrete roadmap for the coming years: both defensive and offensive AI‑powered technologies are going to advance rapidly, especially in vulnerability discovery. Everything auditors do today manually and through a patchwork of tools is gradually being bundled into more powerful and accessible automated stacks.
It’s important to look at reality soberly: the hope that we can reliably “fence off” models from undesirable use is illusory. Any sufficiently capable model is, by definition, dual‑use. Providers will add restrictions, filters, policies — but that’s not a fundamental barrier. Anyone with motivation and resources will spin up a self‑hosted model, assemble their own agentic stack, and use the same technologies without worrying about ToS. You can’t design security under the assumption that attackers won’t have access to these tools.
The economics of attacks are also far from straightforward. In the short term, attacks will get cheaper: more automation, more “wide‑area bombardment,” more exhaustive exploration of states and configurations without humans in the loop. But over the long run, as defensive practices and tools catch up, successful attacks will become more expensive: coverage will improve, trivial bugs will disappear, and effective breaches will require serious infrastructure, preparation, and expertise. This will shift the balance toward fewer incidents — but those that do happen will be far more complex and costly.
My main takeaway: we’ll have to revisit the entire security lifecycle, not just “cosmetically improve” audits. How we describe and understand risk profiles, how threat models evolve with AI in the picture, how we structure development, reviews, testing, deployment, on‑chain monitoring, incident response, and post‑mortems — all of this will need to be rethought. Traditional audits will remain a key piece, but they can no longer be the sole center of gravity. The reality is that AI symmetrically amplifies both defenders and attackers — and Web3 security will have to adapt its entire operating model to this asymmetric arms race.

1,41 mil
11
El contenido de esta página lo proporcionan terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es el autor de los artículos citados y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo vinculado para obtener más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. El holding de activos digitales, incluyendo stablecoins y NFT, implican un alto grado de riesgo y pueden fluctuar en gran medida. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti a la luz de tu situación financiera.

