been buying more dizzy after the launch drama
I think the market is wrong here
Got rugged and lost all my $SOL apeing the $PAWSE launch, for not using a DEX you probably never heard of
>70% of tokens that launch on @solana get sniped in the first block, which was discussed by @aeyakovenko, @blknoiz06 and @davidpco.
@VertigoDex's entire DEX exists to flip that script
Enter Vertigo Launch
Their core primitive is the shiftPool --> a one-sided x*y=k pool that lets you start trading at any market cap while locking 0 real $SOL or $USDC.
It fakes the quote side with a fabricated variable, Magic SOL/USDC, then back-fills with real liquidity as buys arrive.
Getting dizzzyyy....
- - - - -
How a launch works
a) Mint token
• Create shiftPool --> set MC target via Magic SOL/USDC and lock your token supply
• “Begin Trading” --> price discovery for the launched token runs from $0 to ∞ on an AMM that never needs a second pool
Anti-sniping curve (on non Vertigo DEXes)
• During a custom “normalisation period”, fees are punitive, then decay to the base LP fee
• Example from the $PAWSE launch yesterday: buy fee 100% at minute 25, 60% at 45, normalises to 0.3 % after 4 hours
• Snipers still fill --> they just subsidise creators and the protocol
• That was how I lost all my $SOL apeing the $PAWSE launch on @AxiomExchange, thankfully the team has issued refunds!
- - - - -
2. Thoughts on this
a) Bull case
• Start at $5K or $5M cap with 0 liquidity cost --> Magic SOL scales infinitely
• One pool for life; no “graduation” migrations
• Fully transparent dev buys, with liquidity locked forever
• Creator revenue stream --> configurable LP fee + fixed 0.05% Vertigo fee on every swap
• Prevents snipers from front-loading and getting tons of supply at the start
b) Bear case
• Needs trading bots, wallets, and other launchpads to integrate this new pool type
• “Magic” quote asset demands trust and clear UI to avoid confusion.
• Early depth and price impact still unproven versus @RaydiumProtocol-like CLOBs
• Adoption must come from genuine UX pull, this remains to be seen how Vertigo will perform
Future projects may fine this useful as they now have a backend that solves for sniper-resistant launches
The key question is whether the team can seed thick enough books before incumbents copy the fee curve + one-sided pool design.
Network effects hinge on integrations and partnerships with strong teams, not code.
Vertigo could be nothing, or the new default backend for “fair but fun” coins.

3,848
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。


