been buying more dizzy after the launch drama
I think the market is wrong here
Got rugged and lost all my $SOL apeing the $PAWSE launch, for not using a DEX you probably never heard of
>70% of tokens that launch on @solana get sniped in the first block, which was discussed by @aeyakovenko, @blknoiz06 and @davidpco.
@VertigoDex's entire DEX exists to flip that script
Enter Vertigo Launch
Their core primitive is the shiftPool --> a one-sided x*y=k pool that lets you start trading at any market cap while locking 0 real $SOL or $USDC.
It fakes the quote side with a fabricated variable, Magic SOL/USDC, then back-fills with real liquidity as buys arrive.
Getting dizzzyyy....
- - - - -
How a launch works
a) Mint token
• Create shiftPool --> set MC target via Magic SOL/USDC and lock your token supply
• “Begin Trading” --> price discovery for the launched token runs from $0 to ∞ on an AMM that never needs a second pool
Anti-sniping curve (on non Vertigo DEXes)
• During a custom “normalisation period”, fees are punitive, then decay to the base LP fee
• Example from the $PAWSE launch yesterday: buy fee 100% at minute 25, 60% at 45, normalises to 0.3 % after 4 hours
• Snipers still fill --> they just subsidise creators and the protocol
• That was how I lost all my $SOL apeing the $PAWSE launch on @AxiomExchange, thankfully the team has issued refunds!
- - - - -
2. Thoughts on this
a) Bull case
• Start at $5K or $5M cap with 0 liquidity cost --> Magic SOL scales infinitely
• One pool for life; no “graduation” migrations
• Fully transparent dev buys, with liquidity locked forever
• Creator revenue stream --> configurable LP fee + fixed 0.05% Vertigo fee on every swap
• Prevents snipers from front-loading and getting tons of supply at the start
b) Bear case
• Needs trading bots, wallets, and other launchpads to integrate this new pool type
• “Magic” quote asset demands trust and clear UI to avoid confusion.
• Early depth and price impact still unproven versus @RaydiumProtocol-like CLOBs
• Adoption must come from genuine UX pull, this remains to be seen how Vertigo will perform
Future projects may fine this useful as they now have a backend that solves for sniper-resistant launches
The key question is whether the team can seed thick enough books before incumbents copy the fee curve + one-sided pool design.
Network effects hinge on integrations and partnerships with strong teams, not code.
Vertigo could be nothing, or the new default backend for “fair but fun” coins.

3.79 K
0
El contenido al que estás accediendo se ofrece por terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es autor de la información y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido solo se proporciona con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo enlazado para más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. Los holdings de activos digitales, incluidos stablecoins y NFT, suponen un alto nivel de riesgo y pueden fluctuar mucho. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti según tu situación financiera.


