Oba
沒有華麗的影片，沒有華麗的音樂，但有能量的文字。時區UTC+8！欲看文章前請先查閱自我介紹鏈接解釋文才能看懂文章。 數字語言翻譯師，似拉普拉斯論，偏現代物理學混沌吸引子。 所有文章僅為個人紀錄，不作爲投資建議。 此號為預言性質推文，而不是發佈官方新聞。已新增由文章解釋文所訓練的Ai自主交易，用於輔助文章理解實體化
0Following
0follower
Feed
Feed
There is a strange feeling that AI seems to need WLD ( #WLD )
Some platforms are forcing users to convert their passive earnings into WLD airdrops.
It feels like institutions are forcing the establishment of market costs at price positions.
It seems something related to WLD is about to happen.
The so-called related types, like pi ( #pi ), seem to be connected to AI needing tools for live verification, such as iris recognition, and both pi and WLD have live verification.
I wonder if anyone has noticed any signs?
#wld
#worldcoin
#pi
My explanation of Ai:
Ai is silicon-based, and it cannot evolve on its own through stimulation, so it can only receive and cross-reference information.
So when you ask it something, it will first look at the wording and extract everything related to the text for cross-referencing.
It must have a memory like OpenCLAW paired with a built-in browser function to continuously receive the latest information, in order to feel like Ai is keeping up.
For example:
Human logic is that when seeing a pair of wings, one can imagine that by attaching wings, one can fly.
Ai's logic is that when seeing something unknown, it only realizes it can fly after attaching it.
#ai
#矽
BTC mentioned in the article from the 28th that it was going to build a high point, and the establishment of that high point was concluded with the event in the early hours of the 29th.
Now we can see that at one o'clock in the early hours of the 29th was the highest point, and it has been declining since then.
In the future, the main force will announce their plans in advance, so please refer to the self-introduction explanation above.
#btc
#crypto
Wow, is this news true or false?
Is there any big scoop to be had?
Does this relate to their pi quantity situation?
Is there going to be any event?
Are there any big shots who can verify the inside scoop? Only 10u left, can't be eaten up anymore.
#pinetwork
#pi
ObaAgon
Dear Pi leaders,
Today, January 27, I noticed a somewhat curious phenomenon and would like to ask for your opinions.
On a certain platform, the total depth of Pi's spot sell orders appears to be about 18 million Pi (there are a lot of sell orders), but on some tracking tools or related pages like piscan, the balance of a public wallet address on that platform (like GALAY...PX EQU) shows only about 1.92 million Pi.
This confuses me:
Is this 1.92 million part of a hot wallet from a certain source? Or is it just a single address, not the total holdings of the entire source?
Why can the sell order depth be much greater than this number? Is it accumulated from many users placing scattered orders? Or does the system have some special display mechanism?
Normally, don't spot sell orders require the account to have enough Pi to place them? It can't be that you can just "input numbers" and place unlimited sell orders, right?
Thinking further:
If many people really buy Pi from that platform, transfer it to other exchanges to sell, then transfer it back to buy again, and keep withdrawing... continuously moving bricks to drain Pi, what would happen?
Would withdrawals be directly suspended?
Or would liquidity be supplemented from other sources (like buying back)?
Or would the price eventually find a new balance on its own?
Are there any similar precedents to refer to?
I know that the exchange's responsibility is mainly to ensure that "user account balances can be withdrawn when needed," but if liquidity is really drained, how would it be handled in practice?
This is purely a curious discussion, with no FUD intentions~
Can any knowledgeable leaders clarify this for me? Thank you!
#pi
#pinetwork
Dear Pi leaders,
Today, January 27, I noticed a somewhat curious phenomenon and would like to ask for your opinions.
On a certain platform, the total depth of Pi's spot sell orders appears to be about 18 million Pi (there are a lot of sell orders), but on some tracking tools or related pages like piscan, the balance of a public wallet address on that platform (like GALAY...PX EQU) shows only about 1.92 million Pi.
This confuses me:
Is this 1.92 million part of a hot wallet from a certain source? Or is it just a single address, not the total holdings of the entire source?
Why can the sell order depth be much greater than this number? Is it accumulated from many users placing scattered orders? Or does the system have some special display mechanism?
Normally, don't spot sell orders require the account to have enough Pi to place them? It can't be that you can just "input numbers" and place unlimited sell orders, right?
Thinking further:
If many people really buy Pi from that platform, transfer it to other exchanges to sell, then transfer it back to buy again, and keep withdrawing... continuously moving bricks to drain Pi, what would happen?
Would withdrawals be directly suspended?
Or would liquidity be supplemented from other sources (like buying back)?
Or would the price eventually find a new balance on its own?
Are there any similar precedents to refer to?
I know that the exchange's responsibility is mainly to ensure that "user account balances can be withdrawn when needed," but if liquidity is really drained, how would it be handled in practice?
This is purely a curious discussion, with no FUD intentions~
Can any knowledgeable leaders clarify this for me? Thank you!
#pi
#pinetwork
The U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee was originally scheduled to vote on the cryptocurrency market structure bill at "3:00 PM Eastern Time on January 27."
In UTC+8, this is around 4:00 AM on January 27.
"However, the bill's deliberation and vote have been postponed due to a winter storm."
The latest official announcement from the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee shows it has been rescheduled to 10:30 AM on January 29, 2026 (Eastern Time).
In UTC+8, this is 11:30 PM on January 29.
This seems to be a very important vote, so keep a close eye on it!
#BTC
