Post

There were originally three major players dominating the memory chip market: Samsung, SK hynix, and Micron. Their modus operandi involved expanding production during prosperous times and reducing production during downturns. When prices fell, any one of them could declare a reduction in capital expenditure, stabilizing stock prices. This tacit understanding had been in place for thirty years. Today, there is a fourth player on the scene. ChangXin Memory Technology has gone public, closing at a market value of 3 trillion RMB, holding 58 billion RMB in cash. However, the key point is not just China having its own DRAM; it's the disruption of the tacit agreement on production cuts. Previously, the logic behind the top three cutting production was that no other company could seize their market share, so they all cut together and maintained prices collectively. Now, that dynamic has changed. ChangXin won't cooperate in production cuts, and the government of Hefei won't allow them to protect profits. They want market share, not profit margins. What does this mean? During the next downturn in the DRAM cycle, when Samsung says it will reduce production, ChangXin can say it will continue to expand. Prices will drop even further, and the cycle will last longer. This is the real "variable." The cyclical power of the top three giants has cracked. There is another variable on the demand side. AI servers have absorbed all HBM capacity. Samsung and SK hynix have diverted their best production lines to produce HBM, squeezing standard DRAM production lines. ChangXin happens to fill this gap—instead of competing for HBM, it targets the standard product market where you cannot allocate sufficient capacity. This is not direct confrontation; it's taking advantage of your distraction to steal resources. Here comes the crucial part. It's good news for downstream industries. Mobile phone manufacturers and server factories gain more bargaining power with an additional supplier. Samsung can no longer raise prices at will. However, it's not good news for those holding shares in Samsung