Most chains subsidize growth. Abstract recycles it.
And that one design shift might outlast every token incentive in crypto.
Let me show you why Panoramic Governance is the most overlooked breakthrough in Web3 economics: 👇🧵
1/ Everyone’s chasing points, yield, and airdrops.
Meanwhile, Abstract is doing something different:
> Paying builders in real protocol revenue not speculative emissions.
> No tokens printed. No grants. Just live value routing.
> And CT is missing it.
2/ Let’s talk about how most L2s grow:
Arbitrum → 50 million $ARB STIP emissions
Optimism → Quests + OP farming
Base → RetroPGF, points metas
ZkSync → "Farming but trust us" incentives
It works short-term…
But it’s a game of burn → hope → repeat.
3/ Abstract said: what if we just…paid people using real usage?
That’s where Panoramic Governance comes in:
An incentive engine powered by sequencer fees not token inflation.
- No promises. No begging.
- Just value in → value out.
4/ Here’s how it works:
i/ Users interact with apps
ii/ Each tx pays a sequencer fee
iii/ Fees go into a shared pool
iv/ Governance decides where it flows:
- Games
- Builders
- Creators
- Ecosystem tools
Real money. Real routing. In real time.
5/ It’s like if Uniswap fees went back to protocols building on top of it.
Or if Apple let devs vote on where App Store profits go.
Abstract is creating a live revenue feedback loop not one-time grants.
That’s regenerative crypto.
6/ Let’s be blunt:
Most chains say “stick around and we’ll reward you later.” Abstract says “if you create value today, you earn from it today.”
No emissions. No retroactive clout.
Just plug-and-earn.
7/ Here’s the loop that makes it work:
> Apps bring users
> Users generate fees
> PG rewards high-impact apps
> Apps improve → attract more users
> Ecosystem grows organically
It’s not farming.
It’s value compounding.
8/ So why isn’t CT talking about this?
Because we’re trained to think “governance = slow”
And “fees = boring”
But on Abstract:
> Governance = live capital allocator
> Fees = programmable ecosystem fuel
> Builders = revenue partners, not expense lines
9/ If you're chasing yield, go farm.
If you're building a real product, go where value is recycled not extracted.
Abstract isn't a chain you build on.
It’s a chain you build with. ✳️
👇 RT + reply if you find this thread useful
Thank you
5,09k
0
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.