been buying more dizzy after the launch drama
I think the market is wrong here
Got rugged and lost all my $SOL apeing the $PAWSE launch, for not using a DEX you probably never heard of
>70% of tokens that launch on @solana get sniped in the first block, which was discussed by @aeyakovenko, @blknoiz06 and @davidpco.
@VertigoDex's entire DEX exists to flip that script
Enter Vertigo Launch
Their core primitive is the shiftPool --> a one-sided x*y=k pool that lets you start trading at any market cap while locking 0 real $SOL or $USDC.
It fakes the quote side with a fabricated variable, Magic SOL/USDC, then back-fills with real liquidity as buys arrive.
Getting dizzzyyy....
- - - - -
How a launch works
a) Mint token
• Create shiftPool --> set MC target via Magic SOL/USDC and lock your token supply
• “Begin Trading” --> price discovery for the launched token runs from $0 to ∞ on an AMM that never needs a second pool
Anti-sniping curve (on non Vertigo DEXes)
• During a custom “normalisation period”, fees are punitive, then decay to the base LP fee
• Example from the $PAWSE launch yesterday: buy fee 100% at minute 25, 60% at 45, normalises to 0.3 % after 4 hours
• Snipers still fill --> they just subsidise creators and the protocol
• That was how I lost all my $SOL apeing the $PAWSE launch on @AxiomExchange, thankfully the team has issued refunds!
- - - - -
2. Thoughts on this
a) Bull case
• Start at $5K or $5M cap with 0 liquidity cost --> Magic SOL scales infinitely
• One pool for life; no “graduation” migrations
• Fully transparent dev buys, with liquidity locked forever
• Creator revenue stream --> configurable LP fee + fixed 0.05% Vertigo fee on every swap
• Prevents snipers from front-loading and getting tons of supply at the start
b) Bear case
• Needs trading bots, wallets, and other launchpads to integrate this new pool type
• “Magic” quote asset demands trust and clear UI to avoid confusion.
• Early depth and price impact still unproven versus @RaydiumProtocol-like CLOBs
• Adoption must come from genuine UX pull, this remains to be seen how Vertigo will perform
Future projects may fine this useful as they now have a backend that solves for sniper-resistant launches
The key question is whether the team can seed thick enough books before incumbents copy the fee curve + one-sided pool design.
Network effects hinge on integrations and partnerships with strong teams, not code.
Vertigo could be nothing, or the new default backend for “fair but fun” coins.

3.811
0
Il contenuto di questa pagina è fornito da terze parti. Salvo diversa indicazione, OKX non è l'autore degli articoli citati e non rivendica alcun copyright sui materiali. Il contenuto è fornito solo a scopo informativo e non rappresenta le opinioni di OKX. Non intende essere un'approvazione di alcun tipo e non deve essere considerato un consiglio di investimento o una sollecitazione all'acquisto o alla vendita di asset digitali. Nella misura in cui l'IA generativa viene utilizzata per fornire riepiloghi o altre informazioni, tale contenuto generato dall'IA potrebbe essere impreciso o incoerente. Leggi l'articolo collegato per ulteriori dettagli e informazioni. OKX non è responsabile per i contenuti ospitati su siti di terze parti. Gli holding di asset digitali, tra cui stablecoin e NFT, comportano un elevato grado di rischio e possono fluttuare notevolmente. Dovresti valutare attentamente se effettuare il trading o detenere asset digitali è adatto a te alla luce della tua situazione finanziaria.


