Skalowanie rozwiązanych opłat, teraz musimy rozwiązać problem fragmentacji.
Ale ETH nie potrzebuje więcej mostów, potrzebuje jednego standardu.
ERC-7786 zapewnia to ⤵️
Scaling via L2s has become Ethereum's biggest problem:
50+ isolated rollups with fragmented liquidity and complex bridges.
Cross-chain solutions exist, but we need standards to unite them.
Here's how interop standards could revitalize ETH:
First, let's understand how we got here.
Ethereum had a scaling problem during the last cycle. Gas fees peaked at $100+ per transaction as users competed for block space.
Layer 2 rollups emerged to fix this issue, and they worked.
Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, and dozens of others successfully expanded Ethereum's capacity, with fees now counted in cents.
But they also created a new problem: Fragmentation.
Users now must navigate between isolated ecosystems that don't talk to each other. The real-world impact is significant. Imagine you have funds on Optimism but want to use an app on Base. You need to:
• Find a bridge
• Pay expensive fees
• Wait for finality periods
• Manage multiple wallets
The user experience is challenging, to say the least. But interoperability standards are currently being developed to unify the Ethereum ecosystem.
Generally, I am not a fan of standards; however, the lack of standards in this situation has resulted in repeated bottlenecks for developers.
Let's break some of them down:
1. The first interop standard on our list is Across and Uniswap's intent standard (ERC-7683).
Intents allow users to express what they want (swap token X on @base
for token Y on @arbitrum), and then "solvers" will compete to fulfill the order in the most optimized path.
Here's how it works:
When you request a cross-chain swap, a decentralized network of "solvers" competes to fulfill your order. They front the liquidity and provide quick fulfillment, while final settlement occurs later via secure cross-chain messaging.
This is fundamentally different from traditional bridges, where:
• You lock tokens in a contract on chain A
• Wait for confirmation (often minutes or hours)
• Then get wrapped tokens on chain B
Intent-based approaches put user experience first, with settlement happening afterward.
The ERC-7683 standard aims to ensure that protocols share information in a consistent language so that any solver in the decentralized network can understand the order and carry it out.
And ERC-7683 isn't the only standard trying to tackle cross-chain fragmentation.
2. There are multiple other standards trying to stitch isolated rollups together.
Here is a brief breakdown:
• RIP-7755: Enables trustless transactions between rollups via a permissionless network of fulfillers.
• RIP-7859: Exposes Layer 1 origin information inside Layer 2 environments, improving cross-chain data verification.
• ERC-7828: Introduces chain-specific addresses in ENS, reducing confusion when sending assets across different chains.
Each of these standards is a step toward solving isolated ecosystems. However they all face the same underlying issue:
We still need a common language for chains to communicate at the base layer. Without that, fragmentation persists.
To truly scale Ethereum's app layer across chains, the above standards and developers need a shared language.
3. That brings us to ERC-7786, a proposed universal interface for messaging between blockchains.
It’s like agreeing on a mailing address format, so that UPS, FedEx, or DHL can all deliver your package.
Proposed by @OpenZeppelin and @interop_labs (the developer of the @axelar Network), ERC-7786 is minimal by design, built to be lightweight and modular. The goal is to reduce vendor lock-in and enable true cross-chain native applications.
ERC-7786 standardizes:
• Message field encoding
• Sending & receiving logic
• Security guarantees
• Optional “attributes” for protocol-specific behavior
The standard is designed to be flexible, so developers can write code once and deploy it across multiple chains (including L2s and non-EVM environments).
"Chain abstraction" remains the ultimate goal:
• Users shouldn't need to know which chain they're on.
• Wallets should work everywhere.
• Assets should be able to move freely.
Right now, capital is inefficiently locked in dozens of bridge contracts. Meanwhile, developers waste time learning multiple proprietary interfaces while users bear the cost of complexity.
Standardization creates a rising tide that lifts all boats.
In the history of technology, open standards consistently accelerate ecosystem growth.
TCP/IP united the internet, HTTP standardized the web, and now, interop standards will reunite Ethereum's ecosystem.

5,57 tys.
0
Treści na tej stronie są dostarczane przez strony trzecie. O ile nie zaznaczono inaczej, OKX nie jest autorem cytowanych artykułów i nie rości sobie żadnych praw autorskich do tych materiałów. Treść jest dostarczana wyłącznie w celach informacyjnych i nie reprezentuje poglądów OKX. Nie mają one na celu jakiejkolwiek rekomendacji i nie powinny być traktowane jako porada inwestycyjna lub zachęta do zakupu lub sprzedaży aktywów cyfrowych. Treści, w zakresie w jakim jest wykorzystywana generatywna sztuczna inteligencja do dostarczania podsumowań lub innych informacji, mogą być niedokładne lub niespójne. Przeczytaj podlinkowany artykuł, aby uzyskać więcej szczegółów i informacji. OKX nie ponosi odpowiedzialności za treści hostowane na stronach osób trzecich. Posiadanie aktywów cyfrowych, w tym stablecoinów i NFT, wiąże się z wysokim stopniem ryzyka i może podlegać znacznym wahaniom. Musisz dokładnie rozważyć, czy handel lub posiadanie aktywów cyfrowych jest dla Ciebie odpowiednie w świetle Twojej sytuacji finansowej.