Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
沃什把话说透了:BTC没有“独立行情”,它和英伟达坐在同一条船上 沃什今天说了一句很多人不爱听的话。 “利率会直接或间接地影响几乎所有事物。” 他不认同AI扩张能不受借贷成本上升影响。 翻译成大白话:别幻想有什么资产能对利率免疫。AI不行,BTC也不行。 但币圈还在流行另一个故事。 “BTC是抗加息资产。”“加息落地就是利空出尽。”“加密有自己的周期。” 听起来很爽。但今天的数据不支持这个叙事。 FOMC按兵不动,10比2,两个反对票都是要求加息。BTC从80,500美元一路爬回81,245美元,涨0.56%。 同一时间,费城半导体指数涨1.75%,连涨四天;SK海力士美股暴涨13.3%,美光涨5.86%,存储芯片股集体飙涨。 BTC吃的是什么?是科技股情绪的外溢。 美股本周因AI乐观情绪回暖,BTC只是“终于跟上了”。它不是领涨,是补涨。 一项覆盖2438个交易日、62次FOMC会议的九年回溯研究显示:BTC对美联储紧缩冲击的反应,滞后约10个交易日,跌幅是纳指的3到5倍。 在贴现率这个分母面前,BTC不仅和纳斯达克坐在同一条船上——它的船身还更薄。 但这不意味着相关性永远成立。 流动性危机:所有资产被无差别抛售换现金,BTC跌得比科技股更快。 法币信用危机:资金逃离美元体系,BTC可能逆势暴涨。 现在两者都不是。 所以相关性最强的时候,恰恰是你最该放下“独立叙事”的时候。 既然BTC和科技股共享同一个贴现率分母,盯英伟达和纳指期货,比盯链上数据更有效。至少在当前的宏观定价框架下是这样。 CME数据显示12月加息概率已经逼近83%。别在利率方向不明的时候重仓赌BTC“独立行情”。 沃什已经告诉你答案了:利率影响一切。BTC不是例外。 $BTC $ETH $SKHY #美联储维持利率不变,12月加息分歧升温
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
As of the week ending October 18, the daily oil flow through the Strait of Hormuz was about 14 million barrels, only 82% of the pre-war level. The daily number of commercial vessels passing through dropped from more than 20 per day before the conflict to at least 10. Since the beginning of this month, there have been about 30 attacks on ships in and around Hormuz, accounting for 20% of all ships attacked during the entire war. Freight rates for supertankers heading to Asia are approaching a record high of $37.37 per barrel. War risk insurance premiums have surged from less than 3% of the vessel's value to as high as 10%. Oil is still flowing. But the cost of that flow has multiplied several times over. In the past four geopolitical conflicts, BTC has always "fallen first and then risen." In 2022 Russia-Ukraine, it initially dropped 8%, then rebounded 14% after four days. In 2023 Israel-Hamas, it fell 6% that week, then surged 40% over the next 30 days. In 2025 India-Pakistan, it dropped 3% on the day, then recovered the next day. In February 2026, after the US-Israel bombing of Iran, it plunged 6%, then rebounded 17%. The script was exactly the same four times. But the four rebounds share one common premise: energy supply was never truly cut off. Russian oil was still being sold, the Pakistan conflict did not affect oil routes, and the February bombing did not block the strait. This time, the premise has changed. The Iranian Foreign Minister made it very clear: the management and navigation of Hormuz "will no longer be the same as before." In recent weeks, the Revolutionary Guard has taken action against at least seven "violating" oil tankers; between October 21 and 22, seven tankers were attacked or struck mines. On October 27, a tanker with its tracking system turned off struck a mine and caught fire in the eastern strait. The Iranian Navy explicitly stated: vessels passing without coordination make Hormuz "an unsafe state." The US Central Command said "there are no Iranian mines on the main shipping routes." Iran responded the next day with a burning tanker. Both sides speak their own words. But tanker traffic data does not lie: flow is decreasing, costs are rising. Brent crude oil is about $113.88 today, WTI near $99.90, briefly dipping below $100 intraday before pulling back. Oil prices above $100 mean the pressure of inflation penetrating from the energy sector into core inflation is real. The Federal Reserve's room for rate cuts is nailed down by oil prices; the denominator of risk asset valuations is held down by yields. The 10-year US Treasury yield hovers near 5%, reaching 5.365% on October 7, a 24-year high. BTC returned to $81,000 today, up 1%. But it still fell 2.8% over the past 7 days, with heavy selling pressure above after failing to break $100,000. A 1% rise does not mean safety. It only means the market is still waiting for an answer. $BTC $XAU $BZ

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!