Post

阿简在路上
阿简在路上
Show original
没想到这篇帖子能吵得这么厉害😅,但阿简还是那个观点,只要crypto还在,中心化与去中心化之争就永远会在,很难说谁对谁错。各位友仔现在更应该关注的是Bitget在今天下午4点率先恢复的BTC提现,这波提现毫无疑问是一波挤兑测试,能正常提出去是你CEX该做的,提不出去只会被骂得更狠,这也是我强调的补钱很简单,但信任崩塌是很难被逆转的 另外就是我不认为开启提现后会出现大范围砸盘,市场在周末已经差不多把情绪用完了,但如果开启提现后出现卡单、限额、审核,那就难说了 所以涉及这波体现的友仔们建议也别去关注$BTC 的涨跌了,毕竟你在盘口是看不到这个分裂的,SAFU是交易所的钱,能提现的才是你自己的还是多关注关注能到手的流动性吧
阿简在路上
阿简在路上
This Bitget drama keeps escalating. Since the hacker's funds were reported to have been transferred through THORChain, THORChain responded as shown in the image, but this clearly won't quell the anger of the onlookers. It's worth noting that in last year's Bybit hack, which amounted to $1.46 billion, nearly $1.2 billion of the stolen funds were also transferred via THORChain. Currently, many experts led by Lao Xu are fiercely criticizing this. Ajian believes this highlights the inherent flaws of Crypto. On one hand, people have built this financial empire on the narrative of decentralization; on the other hand, if a protocol collects fees from related transactions but does not intervene to block them, it is seen as irresponsible behavior. It's quite a dilemma. Permissionless is a product feature but also a compliance challenge. If a protocol does not block any assets, it is closer to infrastructure; if the protocol has governance and intervention capabilities, the market expects it to bear more responsibility

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!