Postaus

$CORE I’ve seen someone say that if $CORE rises dozens or even hundreds of times years from now, then everything I’m saying today will eventually be criticized. But that’s not the point I’m making. Even if $CORE rises dramatically in the future, it doesn’t automatically invalidate the criticism I’m making today. A token can rise hundreds of times for many different reasons—even a so-called “vapor coin” can have massive speculative rallies. Price appreciation alone does not prove that the original narrative, promises, or execution were correct. Objectively speaking, $CORE has already fallen by hundreds of times from its previous levels. More importantly, the key question is whether the things the project team talked about were actually implemented one by one. If they were not implemented as promised, then a future 10x, 50x, or even 100x price increase cannot suddenly turn those unfulfilled promises into successful execution. Otherwise, the logic becomes: “If the price eventually goes up, then everything that was said before must have been right.” That simply doesn’t follow. A project can fail to deliver on its promises and still experience a massive speculative rally. Those are two completely different things. So my argument is not that $CORE can never rise again. My argument is that future price performance and past execution are separate questions. If the project delivers what it promised, that’s evidence. If it doesn’t, but the token still pumps, that’s speculation—not proof that painting a rosy picture was a successful strategy. That’s the logic I’m trying to express. Is there anything fundamentally wrong with it? #CPIPPIEaseFedSplit #SP500Nears8000