Post

油价刚跌两天就反弹，霍尔木兹协议还没签字——你抄底BTC的手，先放一放前两天，你是不是觉得—— 油价跌了，通胀要降了，美联储要松口了，BTC该起飞了？然后呢？ 8月7日，布伦特原油一天涨了5.04%，从79美元直接干回83.45美元。 8月8日，继续涨，WTI收78.18美元，布伦特收83.55美元。油价刚跌了三天，就涨回来了两天。你那颗刚热起来的心，又凉了吧？故事是这样的—— 8月4日，美国财长贝森特放话：“今天或明天，我们就能达成霍尔木兹协议。” 市场疯了。WTI一天跌5.7%至75.77美元，布伦特跌5.3%至79.36美元。通胀担忧瞬间缓解，风险偏好修复，加密市场普涨。好日子持续了……不到48小时。 8月5日，协议没签。 8月6日，伊朗议会委员会审议限制美国、以色列船只通行的议案，布伦特原油重新上涨逾3美元至82.49美元。 8月7日，胡塞武装袭击沙特，油价继续暴涨。市场用三天时间，把“协议即将达成”的乐观预期全部定价完了。然后发现——协议呢？现在是什么局面？好消息：伊朗官员说，协议总体框架已经明确。伊朗和阿曼已经就航道地理坐标达成共识。美国说一旦协议宣布，就解除对伊朗港口的封锁。坏消息：伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬说——“伊方未在谈判中作任何让步。” 没让步。那你告诉我，协议怎么签？伊朗的方案里写着：禁止敌对国家的船只通过海峡，违规罚款最高达货物价值的20%。美国要求的是自由、无收费通行。一个要关，一个要开。这叫“接近达成协议”？更要命的是——协议签了，也不一定能执行。航运业人士已经发出警告：美国现有的制裁和保险条款，可能让这个协议根本无法落地。简单说：就算伊朗说“放行”，保险公司可能说“不去”。船不敢开，协议就是废纸。 “恢复通航”和“商船敢走”之间，还差着一个行业的恐惧。那这对你的BTC意味着什么？先说短期——油价不稳，BTC就不稳。 8月3日那一周，BTC从63,600美元跌到62,800美元。油价大跌那两天，BTC也没怎么涨。为什么？因为市场已经学精了—— 它不再为“预期”买单了。它要看到“落地”。协议没签字，油价随时反弹。油价一反弹，通胀预期就回来。通胀预期一回来，美联储就不敢松。美联储不松，风险资产就没戏。这个传导链，短得可怕。那我的配置思路是什么？第一，不追“协议预期”的行情。 8月4日那一波，是消息驱动。消息没落地，行情就退潮。你追进去，就是接盘侠。第二，盯着两个东西——协议签字，和商船实际通行。协议签字只是第一步。商船敢不敢走，保险敢不敢保，才是真正的“风险解除信号”。在这之前，油价随时可能重新计入风险溢价。第三，如果油价真的稳住75-80美元区间，我会重新看多BTC。逻辑很简单：油价稳住→通胀预期降温→美联储加息压力缓解→流动性预期改善→风险资产估值修复。但这个“如果”，目前还没发生。这一轮，市场被“即将达成协议”耍了三次。 8月4日一次，8月5日一次，8月7日又一次。每次都说“快了”，每次都没签。你还在等“油价大跌利好BTC”的剧本？剧本没写错，但导演还没喊Action。 $BTC $BZ $CL #霍尔木兹谈判取得进展，油价风险降温了吗？

Oil prices fell 10% for the week, BTC climbed above 64K: The market is pricing in the "best script," but geopolitics never follows the script Have you been quite happy these past couple of days? BTC has risen above $64,000 and has risen for several consecutive days. Oil prices have plummeted—is inflation about to cool down? Shouldn't the Federal Reserve be going easy now? Stop. Don't rush to pop champagne just yet. Over the past week, Brent crude oil has fallen from above $100 to around $83, down nearly 10% on the weekly chart. At the same time, Bitcoin rebounded from below $63,000 and climbed back above $64,000. This drop and rise seem to perfectly echo— Oil prices fell → as inflation expectations cooled → Fed rate hike pressure eased, → BTC rose. The logic is sound. But the question is: how long can this logic last? Let's first look at why oil prices are falling. The core is just one thing: the Strait of Hormuz is about to reopen. U.S. officials said that negotiations between Iran and Oman over the passage of the Strait of Hormuz have made substantial progress, and an agreement is expected to be reached soon. Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs also acknowledged that the negotiations were "professional and progressive," and that the proposed geographic coordinates for the new route had been agreed upon. Once the agreement is finalized, millions of barrels of Middle Eastern crude oil supply could return to the market. U.S. Central Command also revealed that since the blockade on Iran was reinstated, 49 merchant ships have been rerouted. With the blockade lifted, a large amount of oil supplies will return to the market. Oil prices fell because the market was pricing in the "best script"—the reopening of the strait, supply recovery, and cooling inflation. BTC has reached 64,000, which is also trading the same script. Geopolitical easing → oil prices fall→ cooling inflation expectations → U.S. Treasury yields falling, → risk assets rebound. The logical chain couldn't be clearer. But here's the question—will this "best script" really go on? I'm throwing you three buckets of cold water. First basin: Iran says the agreement does not mean the straits will open. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Bagae made it clear: reaching an agreement does not mean the Strait of Hormuz will resume safe navigation. He put it bluntly—the closure of the strait was due to military operations by the United States and Israel against Iran, and the U.S. maritime blockade still exists, so the security situation in the strait has not fundamentally improved. To put it plainly: the agreement is signed, but whether it opens depends on how the U.S. performs. Iranian media also reported that the agreement is unrelated to the "immediate opening of the Strait of Hormuz." The opening of the strait depends on the U.S. side changing previous violations. The market is pricing in "reopening immediately," while Iran is saying "depends on the situation." The gap between these is worlds apart. Second Basin: Iran's parliament is considering a bill—to permanently ban U.S. and Israeli vessels from passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Violators are fined up to 20% of the value of the goods. On one side, U.S. officials said, "An agreement is almost reached," while on the other, the Iranian parliament said, "We need to legislate to ban U.S.-Israel ships from passing through." Which do you think is true? Third pot: The details of the agreement have not been finalized yet. Who controls the shipping lanes? Is there a fee? How much is charged? Has the U.S. lifted its blockade on Iranian ports? All question marks. The U.S. wants "free passage and no fees." Iran wants to charge 5% to 7% of the value of the goods. How big is the gap? One wants to get free, the other wants to get paid. There's a whole negotiation table in between. What's even harsher? Before the agreement was signed, three ships from Abu Dhabi National Oil Company were attacked this week while passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, Iran attacked "hostile targets" in the strait on Thursday. They were negotiating while fighting. This is the Middle East. Bank of America's senior investment chief put it bluntly: "An agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz remains difficult to reach, and investors are in a wait-and-see mode. Currently, shipping volumes remain low, and the path to a lasting agreement remains uncertain. ” Here's something to say to the heart: This BTC rebound is essentially a technical recovery driven by geopolitical easing, rather than a full reboot of the bull market. Spot trading volume remains shrinking, with Coinbase's premium remaining negative for about 80 days—indicating that buying pressure from U.S. institutions in the spot market remains subdued. BTC is fluctuating within a range near 64,000, failing to form a clear directional trend. This week, BTC rose by $1,000 from 63,000 to 64,000. But if the protocol fails and oil prices surge back to 100, how many days can this $1,000 hold? Next, keep an eye on three signals: First, will the agreement be signed or not? U.S. officials say "very soon," but "soon" on Wall Street means "days," and in the Middle East it means "months." Second, will the Iranian parliament's bill banning U.S.-Israel ships pass? If it does, all agreements will be meaningless. Third, will oil prices rebound or continue to fall? Brent settled at $83.55 today, but if the agreement fails, returning to $100 would only take one missile. The market is pricing in the "best script." But geopolitics never follows a script. The script says "peace." In reality, it is written as "uncertain." $BTC $BZ $CL #霍尔木兹谈判取得进展, has the risk of oil prices cooled down?