Perpetual DEXs generated over $70M in protocol revenue over the past 30 days. Yet most assessments stop at trading volume and fees, neglecting token emissions, float %, and FDV. We examined five key protocols to evaluate efficiency (Revenue-to-Emission ratio) and dilution risk.
1/ Breakdown of Perp Protocols | Revenue (30d) vs Emissions : $HYPE: $65.8M revenue | 0% emissions $GMX: $2.07M revenue | 0.1% emissions ($185K) $DYDX: $1.13M revenue | 1.27% emissions ($5M) $DRIFT: $1.1M revenue | 3.51% emissions ($6.5M) $SNX: $74K revenue | 0% emissions
2/ $HYPE •Revenue: $65.8M •Emissions: 0% •FDV: $40B | Float: 33% Despite the absence of emissions, $HYPE’s valuation is driven by secondary market assumptions. A $40B FDV with a third in float raises concerns over eventual unlock impact and valuation sustainability.
3/ $GMX •Revenue: $2.07M •Emissions: $185K (0.1%) •FDV: $152M | Float: 77% •Rev/Emission Ratio: 11.2x A standout on efficiency. $GMX combines high float with disciplined emissions. Revenues significantly outpace token inflation, supporting a stronger value accrual narrative.
4/ $DYDX •Revenue: $1.13M •Emissions: $5M (1.27%) •FDV: $509M | Float: Moderate •Rev/Emission Ratio: 0.23x $DYDX emits 4x more in tokens than it earns in revenue. This negative carry dilutes holders and undermines the protocol’s economic sustainability, despite strong brand presence.
5/ $DRIFT •Revenue: $1.1M •Emissions: $6.5M (3.51%) •FDV: $453M | Float: 30% •Rev/Emission Ratio: 0.17x The weakest performer. With just 30% float and emissions far exceeding revenue, $DRIFT’s token model is heavily inflationary — a typical profile for early-stage protocols, but one that limits capital efficiency in the short term.
6/ $SNX •Revenue: $74K •Emissions: 0% •FDV: $203M | Fully Diluted Though emission-free and fully diluted, $SNX is currently generating negligible revenue. Without a material top-line, value capture remains theoretical.
7/ Key Takeaways •Emission Discipline Matters: $GMX is the most emission-efficient, maintaining revenue at 11x its token inflation. •High Revenue ≠ Sustainable Value: $HYPE leads in revenue, but with zero token distribution, questions remain around future dilution. •DYDX & DRIFT Highlight Risk: Both emit several multiples more than they earn, compounding float pressure and weakening fundamentals.
Like what you read? Share the post and follow @Tokenomist_ai for more insights like this. 📊 Start analyzing emission schedules today:
Perpetual DEXs generated over $70M in protocol revenue over the past 30 days. Yet most assessments stop at trading volume and fees, neglecting token emissions, float %, and FDV. We examined five key protocols to evaluate efficiency (Revenue-to-Emission ratio) and dilution risk.
6,58k
0
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.