Stargaze migration proposal to the Hub ends today!
Stakecito is voting Yes ✅
Why we support this proposal:
We support this proposal because it brings an immediately useful, battle tested, and widely adopted consumer application suite to the Cosmos Hub at a moment when the Hub needs real usage more than anything else. @StargazeZone delivers a complete marketplace, launchpad, creator studio, and name service on day one, together with thousands of collections and a large community that is culturally important across the entire ecosystem.
The migration increases Hub activity, activates new $ATOM utility across trading and minting, and provides long term development commitments backed by a team that has shipped consistently for years. The updated proposal also includes a realistic and forward looking roadmap that focuses on retail adoption, creator onboarding, multichain growth funnels, and a RWA strategy developed together with @cosmoslabs_io.
The funding structure is milestone based, fully capped, and protected by a multisig with community oversight. Any excess value or unused funds go back to the community pool. This creates a well controlled environment where the Hub receives measurable, high impact deliverables while maintaining accountability.
Above all, this proposal strengthens the Cosmos Hub in a practical and durable way. It adds real applications, new users, increased visibility, and a dedicated team building directly on the Hub’s core infrastructure. In our view, this is a strategic investment that accelerates ecosystem growth and positions the Hub as a home for meaningful consumer activity.

After seeing the modifications made to the @StargazeZone proposal, I am now in support of the proposal.
When I spoke to Ruwan and Brady from the Stargaze team, I made my position clear:
1. Moving to the Hub will not solve Stargaze’s problems, the chain doesn’t matter and won’t bring users.
2. Nothing changes if nothing changes, and there needs to be a new roadmap and growth plan to better guarantee success.
3. You cannot treat your ATOM payments as a speculative asset.
In response, they have added sections to the proposal on changing their marketing to be more D2C, and a RWA roadmap - which is something I think is the most promising for Stargaze’s future direction.
They have impressed me with their ability to change, receive feedback, and resilience in the wake of their founder leaving. As an ATOM holder and community member, I am willing to take the bet on them.
Mag
Don't forget to cast your vote!
⏳ Voting ends: Nov 26, '25
🗳️ Vote here:
1.104
6
Il contenuto di questa pagina è fornito da terze parti. Salvo diversa indicazione, OKX non è l'autore degli articoli citati e non rivendica alcun copyright sui materiali. Il contenuto è fornito solo a scopo informativo e non rappresenta le opinioni di OKX. Non intende essere un'approvazione di alcun tipo e non deve essere considerato un consiglio di investimento o una sollecitazione all'acquisto o alla vendita di asset digitali. Nella misura in cui l'IA generativa viene utilizzata per fornire riepiloghi o altre informazioni, tale contenuto generato dall'IA potrebbe essere impreciso o incoerente. Leggi l'articolo collegato per ulteriori dettagli e informazioni. OKX non è responsabile per i contenuti ospitati su siti di terze parti. Gli holding di asset digitali, tra cui stablecoin e NFT, comportano un elevato grado di rischio e possono fluttuare notevolmente. Dovresti valutare attentamente se effettuare il trading o detenere asset digitali è adatto a te alla luce della tua situazione finanziaria.


