I think this take is correct and is why i've struggled with protocols like Grass comparing themselves to reddit data (and ascribing value to gathering internet data).
Zuck has said this before about media that individual articles etc. actually aren't that valuable. Too cheap to meter is real on data gathering side too, not just inference.
Hot take from my panel on decentralized AI at UC Berkeley: Your data is worthless.
The idea that you'll get rich selling your data to train AI is a fantasy. The frontier is high-quality synthetic data, not your dumb tweets.
Second hot take: the government censorship of AI has not started yet. It will come soon. And when it does, decentralized AI will matter in the same way that the rise of financial surveillance made Bitcoin matter.
Spicy back and forth with @avichal and @FranklinBi 👇
2.81K
10
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.