Balancer Finally Explains the $128M Hack: A Hidden Rounding Error in Code

Balancer has confirmed that a subtle rounding error buried deep in its V2 smart contract logic was the root cause of a devastating multi-chain exploit on November 3, 2025. The vulnerability, which went undetected for years despite multiple audits, allowed an attacker to siphon roughly $128 million worth of assets across seven blockchain networks.

How a Tiny Error Became a Massive Breach

The issue stemmed from a precision loss in the swap calculation logic of Balancer’s V2 Composable Stable Pools, specifically in the _upscaleArray and mulDown functions. These functions, responsible for token scaling during pool swaps, introduced downward rounding errors when processing extremely small balances, sometimes as low as 8–9 wei, or a billionth of a billionth of an ether.

While each rounding event created only a minuscule discrepancy, the attacker weaponized the flaw through repeated batch swaps. By chaining hundreds of such micro-swaps into single flash-loan transactions, the exploiter amplified those minor deviations into massive distortions in the pool’s internal balance.

This precision error propagated through the pool’s invariant calculation (D), a key variable that maintains equilibrium between tokens. As the invariant value fell artificially, the price of the Balancer Pool Tokens (BPT) plummeted. The hacker then withdrew assets at deflated valuations, effectively draining the affected pools.

The Multi-Chain Fallout

The exploit targeted Balancer’s deployments on Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Gnosis, and Berachain, with combined estimated losses of $128.64 million. Only V2 Composable Stable Pools were impacted, newer versions, including V3, remain unaffected.

Balancer’s response was swift. The team paused all vulnerable pools, halted the creation of new ones, and launched a safe withdrawal interface to help users recover remaining funds. The protocol is now working with blockchain forensic specialists to track the stolen tokens and coordinate cross-chain recovery efforts.

Gemini Expands in Europe with 100x Leveraged XRP Perpetual Contracts

Audits, Accountability, and Lessons Learned

Perhaps most troubling for DeFi observers is that Balancer’s V2 code had undergone multiple security audits by reputable firms since 2021. None identified this rounding-based economic logic flaw. The incident has reignited debate over whether traditional code audits can effectively anticipate non-linear economic exploits, those that exploit mathematical edge cases rather than coding oversights.

Balancer’s engineering team described the event as “a precision vulnerability that eluded static analysis,” adding that additional economic stress testing frameworks will be implemented before reactivating affected pools.

The breach underscores a recurring truth in decentralized finance: even a rounding difference of a few wei can become a multimillion-dollar exploit when paired with leverage, composability, and code operating at global scale.

The post Balancer Finally Explains the $128M Hack: A Hidden Rounding Error in Code appeared first on ETHNews.

3 tys.
0
Treści na tej stronie są dostarczane przez strony trzecie. O ile nie zaznaczono inaczej, OKX nie jest autorem cytowanych artykułów i nie rości sobie żadnych praw autorskich do tych materiałów. Treść jest dostarczana wyłącznie w celach informacyjnych i nie reprezentuje poglądów OKX. Nie mają one na celu jakiejkolwiek rekomendacji i nie powinny być traktowane jako porada inwestycyjna lub zachęta do zakupu lub sprzedaży aktywów cyfrowych. Treści, w zakresie w jakim jest wykorzystywana generatywna sztuczna inteligencja do dostarczania podsumowań lub innych informacji, mogą być niedokładne lub niespójne. Przeczytaj podlinkowany artykuł, aby uzyskać więcej szczegółów i informacji. OKX nie ponosi odpowiedzialności za treści hostowane na stronach osób trzecich. Posiadanie aktywów cyfrowych, w tym stablecoinów i NFT, wiąże się z wysokim stopniem ryzyka i może podlegać znacznym wahaniom. Musisz dokładnie rozważyć, czy handel lub posiadanie aktywów cyfrowych jest dla Ciebie odpowiednie w świetle Twojej sytuacji finansowej.