Orbit Post Sitemap
#SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？
Optimistic: Q4 guidance raises ASP and profit margin, official announcement of special dividends, HBM4 shipments exceed expectations → valuation recovery has a catalyst, but upside is constrained by overall sentiment in the AI sector;
Neutral (most likely): performance meets the expected 77 trillion KRW, guidance remains stable, dividends undecided → stock price will likely continue to fluctuate within a range, "good news is not new";
Pessimistic: HBM4 share and shipments are revised down again, 2027 price increase less than 2x, no additional shareholder returns → the market will reinterpret the "3x PE" as a "cyclical peak discount" rather than "undervaluation."$BTC On the eve of the FOMC: Don't bet two days as one direction
The real challenge this week is two days, not choosing one direction:
1) Wednesday, October 28, 14:00 Eastern Time, FOMC decision. The probability of "no change" on Polymarket has reached 94%, up from 52% on October 14. The market has fully priced in "no change," so the decision itself has little room for surprise; the only variables left are the statement wording and post-meeting remarks—betting on the decision's direction is equivalent to betting on an already priced-in outcome.
2) Friday, October 30, about 136,000 $BTC options expire on Deribit, with a notional value of about $11 billion, accounting for about one-third of Deribit's $BTC options open interest. The Put/Call ratio is about 0.55; bullish volume does not equal bullish sentiment, as selling, hedging, and spreads are included. The maximum pain point is around 78,000, which is the cost line calculated from the options ledger, not spot support—don't treat it as a bottom line for buying. Based on 32% implied volatility, the one standard deviation range before expiration is about 77,600–83,835.
This week is not about choosing a direction, but enduring volatility. Don't heavily bet on direction before the FOMC; if 79,220 breaks, first watch the 77,600 area; only after reclaiming 82,100 (the 200-day moving average) and holding for 1-2 days can a reversal be discussed.BTC is now at $79,500, down 1.44% in 24 hours.
But its 3-month implied volatility is at the 0.8 percentile over the past three years. The 6-month is at the 0.2 percentile.
The market is pricing in "nothing will happen" for a night that is about to explode with four consecutive shocks.
This is the most dangerous time. Volatility doesn’t disappear; it just shifts—from pricing into your positions.
Thursday 02:30 Wash speech—focus on wording, not rates. 90% chance no change this week, that’s not the point. The only point: will he still describe financial conditions as "accommodative"? As long as that word remains, the December rate hike sword still hangs.
Thursday 20:30 Core PCE + GDP—core PCE YoY ≥3.1%, overall PCE ≥3.6%, if either exceeds, the December hike narrative adds another brick. The probability of a December hike is already at 68.9%.
Starting early Friday, tech earnings—Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon one after another. Don’t look at revenue, only two things: AI capital expenditure guidance and cloud business growth. If free cash flow continues to deteriorate, Nasdaq will crash first, will BTC follow?
Three paths | Trigger conditions:
Path A | Hawkish Wash + accelerating PCE
USD and US Treasury yields rise together. If BTC can’t hold, watch 79,400—that day’s intraday support. Below that, 74,800 (short-term holder cost) to 77,600 (real market average) is the real dividing line.
Path B | Neutral Wash + PCE meets expectations + solid earnings
Volatility releases from historical lows but with an upward bias. BTC tests 82,500. But don’t expect altcoins to strengthen independently—liquidity squeezed from "ultra-low volatility" always first goes to BTC, not altcoins.
Path C | Unexpectedly dovish Wash, or PCE below expectations
December hike pricing pulls back from 68.9%, risk assets pulse short-term. But dovishness alone won’t keep BTC above 85,000. Whether it continues depends on earnings cooperation. Dovishness gives a rebound, not a reversal.
IV is at a three-year low, meaning "buying insurance" is very cheap now.
You don’t need to predict direction to survive this week. You just need to pay the cost of protection before taking any directional position.
Volatility has already given you a discount; if you don’t buy, that’s your own problem.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #本周将公布10月FOMC利率决议 #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ Folks, on October 28, the global storage leader SK Hynix will release its Q3 earnings report. This report can be said to be a lifeline for the entire AI hardware industry chain.
All eyes in the market are now on HBM4. AI server demand is still surging, and the mass production progress of HBM4 directly determines whether Hynix can continue to dominate the market. As long as shipment volume, price, and profit margin keep rising, quarterly profits are very likely to hit a new high again.
But just looking at profits in this report is no longer enough. Recently, Micron and Western Digital had good earnings data, yet their stock prices were still hammered. Why? Because the market is extremely picky now, fearing endless capital expenditures by giants and fearing the peak of the cycle. If Hynix only delivers explosive profits but the guidance isn’t bright enough, or if there’s even a hint of hesitation in HBM4’s pricing power, the market will immediately turn sour.
This matter directly impacts our BTC. The sentiment of global tech stocks now hinges entirely on AI, and Hynix is at the very core. If its earnings greatly exceed expectations and the guidance is very strong, the risk appetite for tech stocks can stabilize, and BTC can catch a breather around the 80,000 mark. But if its performance disappoints and drags down the entire semiconductor sector, BTC definitely won’t escape and will have to fall further. $SKHYNIX $BTC $81,300.
This is the average cost line for US spot ETF investors.
Hold it, and the ETF buying continues to support the price. If broken, the next support is between 73,000-75,000.
CME FedWatch: 92.8% probability of maintaining rates in October, 7.2% probability of a rate hike.
The data is clear; betting on a surprise has zero cost-effectiveness.
The real information is not in the rate itself, but in what Waller says. He is very unlikely to give you confirmation of "tightening ending." September PPI month-on-month is 1.3%, the hottest since March 2022. Against this backdrop, the last thing a Fed chair would do is give you a break.
December rate hike probability: 67.5%-68.9%. Goldman Sachs baseline: one hike in December and one in March next year.
"Pause" is not a "pivot." There is a whole inflation issue between these two words.
The Fed gives you a candy in October and a slap in December. The candy is fake; the slap is real.
ETF cost basis is about 81,300, the 50-day moving average is about 81,700, both lines overlap in the same area.
ETFs have replaced corporate reserves as the main buyer of BTC. Since August, ETF net inflows are about $6.4 billion, while corporate reserves are only $1.5 billion.
ETFs are holding on, but struggling. Stablecoin supply has dropped about $12.7 billion from the May peak; on-chain "bullets" are decreasing.
Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, combined capital expenditure guidance for 2026 is about $730 billion, while direct AI annual revenue is about $25 billion—only 4% of the expenditure.
Meta has already fallen in advance: free cash flow turned negative $2.1 billion, the first time since listing. Microsoft’s free cash flow dropped 23% last quarter.
Revenue beating expectations? No one cares anymore. The market now asks only one question: who will pay the bill?
The AI story has been told for three years; starting this week, the market wants the receipts.
Thursday and Friday: PCE + ECB + BOJ
Core PCE year-on-year expected at 3.1%, previous 3.0%. The direction is up, not down.
BOJ is expected to keep rates unchanged but may hint at action in December or January. ECB appears the same day.
Five events: FOMC, Waller press conference, GDP + PCE, ECB, BOJ—all packed into 72 hours.
This week’s volatility is not driven by one event. It’s five events knocking at the door simultaneously.
October FOMC has no "surprises," only "confirmation."
BTC’s 81K defense line and the AI bill for tech stocks are the two real variables to watch this week.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC First, submit the transcript. In the last round, I placed three shorts—BTC 80,105.71→79,784.19 (+0.40%), ETH 2,328.18→2,310.04 (+0.78%), ZEC 1,204.02→1,196.80 (+0.60%), all three hit, none triggered stop loss or take profit. The profits were just small amounts; I’m not bragging about this performance. The real value isn’t in those fractions of a percent, but in not being on the wrong side of the direction: in that round, the whole market was waiting for 80,000 to hold, and I wrote that it wouldn’t hold. Data as of 12 o’clock. This round, I’m not chasing the dip—where the drop was the hardest, leverage has already been cleaned out once, so chasing shorts now would be giving the fattest part of the move to those already in the market. This round’s three orders: continue shorting ZEC, and reverse to long on BNB and TRX. ZEC | Short 1,196.80 | Stop loss 1,226.05 | Take profit 1,148.06 The rhythm this month is clear: from 480 to 1,368, then dropping more than 20%, each bounce reaching a lower high than the last. On Sunday, it dropped 2.71% in one hour; on the 24th, a single-day drop of 7.76% wiped out many leveraged longs, and the rebound the next day was positions being covered by those who were wiped out, not new money coming in. Annualized funding rate is over 10%, longs are paying daily to hold on—this isn’t price not holding, it’s holding cost not holding. On-chain, two addresses withdrew 24,706 coins from exchanges in one month, at an average price of 1,140 $BTC is weak. Current price is 79,782.4, just a few hundred dollars above the 24-hour low of 79,321.8. The main liquidations today are longs, with amounts clearly outweighing shorts. This round of decline is a deleveraging of long positions; every drop in price forces a batch of stop losses. Contract open interest is still 7.55 billion USD, long leverage hasn't been fully cleared, so there is still fuel below. Options put/call ratio is 0.60, indicating some short-term bets on a rebound. DVOL at 38.4 is relatively low, the market wasn't prepared for a sharp drop, so volatility will amplify if a real breakdown occurs. Funding rates are slightly positive, just background info. Stablecoins totaling 303.2 billion USD are present, but there's no sign of them entering the market to support the bottom. On the chart, moving averages are in a bearish alignment with lower highs, consistent with this view. The previous low is very likely to break, and new lows will be seen next. Conditions to turn bullish: reclaim and hold above 80,929.5, otherwise this view is invalid.Is this rebound an opportunity or a trap?
Last night the market experienced a sharp fluctuation, with mainstream coins like $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL rebounding one after another. But personally, I'm not in a hurry to be bullish yet. Just because the price dropped and then pulled back doesn't mean the market has truly bottomed. The key is to see whether this is a short-term capital replenishment or a new round of buying entering the market.
BTC: The rebound has occurred, but capital support still appears insufficient.
Previous data shows a net outflow of $19.56 million in BTC spot over 4 hours, and a net outflow of $257 million in contracts; the 24-hour contract net outflow expanded to $385 million, with a 30-day cumulative net outflow reaching $7.71 billion. Short-term rebounds can be driven by short covering, but the continuous outflow of medium-term capital indicates that buying power has not yet formed sufficient momentum.
ETH: Capital performance is also not optimistic.
There was a slight net inflow of $1.72 million in spot over 24 hours, but contracts are still seeing outflows, with a 30-day contract net outflow of $8.46 billion. The small amount of spot support is not yet enough to indicate that market risk appetite has recovered.
SOL and ZEC also need continued observation.
SOL shows a divergence pattern with spot support and contract withdrawals; ZEC sees capital outflows in both spot and contracts, so the sustainability of the short-term rebound needs further verification.
Today my judgment remains cautious: the rebound is first seen as a repair, not rushing to confirm the bottom, nor blindly chasing shorts.
#本周将公布10月FOMC利率决议 Bitcoin appears to be entering the sixth accumulation phase in nearly two years
Based on the net position data of $BTC on exchanges over the past two years, it currently looks like it has entered a new round of accumulation. During this phase, price volatility may be relatively large, but it will greatly help the upward trend of Bitcoin's price.
In the previous five accumulation phases, BTC price generally rose alongside, and the stronger the accumulation, the higher the potential BTC price increase and the longer the upward trend might last.
From the current perspective, it seems to have just entered the initial accumulation phase, with buying power still significantly weaker compared to the previous five times. If the buying strength can increase like before, the probability of Bitcoin's price rising will be higher, and compared to the selling phase, the price stability is still relatively strong.
Some may question the decline at the end of the fourth accumulation phase, but that phase saw BTC reach a historical high, and the accumulation strength and duration were not very strong.
Therefore, I say that the stronger the accumulation, the more it helps Bitcoin's price increase, and at least during the accumulation phase, BTC's downward movement is limited, indicating that more investors are willing to buy at the current price level.Yushu contract price is about twenty yuan lower than the stock's face value, and the contract has already bet on a decline in advance. I just looked at the capital flow of Yushu on the STAR Market, with a turnover rate of 26%. Large investors' outflow slightly exceeds inflow, while retail investors' inflow slightly exceeds outflow. The difference is not significant. However, the divergence among funds is quite obvious. It feels somewhat lacking in momentum.After reviewing this set of capital flows, the conclusion aligns with the market situation: all the money moving is leveraged funds, not spot funds fleeing, which must be clearly distinguished to avoid scaring yourself.
BTC saw a net outflow of 7.71 billion in 30-day contracts, and the short-term inflow has completely dissipated.
ETH is even worse, with 8.46 billion leaving 30-day contracts; its capital structure is clearly weaker than BTC’s. This matches its position shrinking the most in recent days, unable to recover even within an hour—it's all part of the same story.
SOL is the only bright spot here; spot saw a net inflow of 8.86 million in 24 hours, indicating some are buying at low levels. However, contract funds still fled 24.01 million, with leverage not returning, so the rebound lacks strength.
ZEC saw outflows in both spot and contracts, with 1.04 billion leaving 30-day contracts. The recent excitement has truly subsided; even if trading is active, it’s just turnover, not inflow.
On the news front, there’s no help: the Federal Reserve is in a quiet period with no one speaking, oil prices have surged above 116 adding fuel to inflation, and the market must tough it out until Thursday when FOMC, GDP, and PCE data are released.
My view: BTC is hovering below 80,000; the short-term fill is just shorts covering and chasing rebounds, not trend buying. There are two possible paths ahead: if it breaks back above 80,000 and contract outflows stop, I’ll believe the rebound has legs; if it fails and breaks below the previous low, it will look for another lower support level. Before the data release, I treat any rebound as a chance to reduce positions, not to chase; ETH is the weakest, so I suppress any bottom-fishing thoughts; for SOL, I only watch if spot support remains—without leverage returning, it won’t go far.#三星Q3利润预增近8倍，完整财报即将揭晓 Only market logic analysis, not investment advice
Earnings forecast operating profit 107.4 trillion KRW, a year-on-year increase of 782.5%, mainly driven by HBM and DRAM price increases and volume growth, with the chip business accounting for almost all profits, while the mobile phone segment remains under pressure. The market has already priced in most of the positive news, focusing on the full financial report for HBM4 shipment structure, capital expenditure, and customer order guidance.
✅Positive: HBM4 continues to ramp up, AI server storage demand remains strong, DRAM/NAND prices maintain an upward trend;
⚠️Risk: Sequential growth rate significantly slows, market concerns about storage capacity expansion and cycle peak, while exchange rates and extra bonuses may erode profits.
📌Scenario judgment: The forecast is close to the expected upper limit; even if the data is not bad, if guidance is conservative, it is easy for the positive news to be realized and then fall back; only raising the HBM shipment target and ASP expectations can provide continuous catalysts.Bullish data rising ≠ buying entry, more like leverage holding hard. $BTC 80489, $ETH 2346, $SOL 101.48.
① SOL is the most dangerous: large holders' long-short ratio 2.87, 76.4% of accounts are long, but only 48.1% of active trades are long; 8h funding rate -0.021%, 24h long liquidations 17.3M, short liquidations 1.0M. Crowded long stampede, defense at 100.10, passive long positions above 103.44.
② ETH lacks buying: October US spot ETF net outflow 1.18B, outflows on 16th and 14th; Glamsterdam delayed. 670M liquidation below 2313, break of 2328 turns longs into fuel.
③ BTC looks stable: this week ETF net inflow 301M, but outflow 773.5M on Thursday and Friday, with 635.6M on Thursday being the largest single-day outflow since June. Psychological level at 80000, real support between 79200–79800, funding rate still positive, longs holding hard.
④ Macro: October FOMC very likely to hold at 90.6%, December rate hike probability 67.5%, economists all expect; oil price at 116 suppresses risk appetite.
Conclusion: Consensus bullish but not bottom. Watch SOL 100.10/103.44, ETH 2328, BTC 79200; first break triggers domino washout of longs. Light positions, quick hands.
#本周将公布10月FOMC利率决议 #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ Where is the fundamental problem behind Hynix's continuous decline?On Monday morning, BTC dropped below 80,000 again! Last week, the ETF clearly had a net inflow of $300 million, so why is the price still falling? When you separate the sequence of fund inflows and outflows, the answer is less optimistic.
Latest disclosure: In the first three trading days last week, BTC ETFs attracted about $1.07 billion, but in the last two trading days, $774 million flowed out. The weekly net inflow is positive, but it can't hide the reversal of funds in the latter half of the week.
First, look at $BTC, quoted at 79,687, down 1.48% in 24 hours. After losing 80,000, first see if it can recover and hold; if the rebound is suppressed again, 79,000 is the next key level to watch.
Next, look at $ETH, quoted at 2,310, down 2.29%. The ETF had a net outflow of about $221 million last week, and the decline also exceeded that of BTC. Whether 2,300 can hold is more important than rushing to call for a return to 2,400.
Finally, look at $SOL, quoted at 100.78, down 1.63%. The ETF had zero net inflow on Friday, and since October, a net outflow of about $68 million. 100 dollars is right below; after holding it, it still depends on whether funds are willing to step in.
Summary: Weekly net inflow does not mean buying every day. Wait for both price and funds to improve together; don't just pick the data that sounds good!
Do you think BTC will recover 80,000 first, or will SOL break below 100 dollars first?
For personal record only, not investment advice.
#SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ SOL's on-chain data is actually not bad; RWA and tokenized stocks are both growing, but the price is just stuck at $101 pretending to be dead. The reason is simple: SOL ETF had a cumulative net outflow of about $68 million in October, and the net inflow on the 24th was zero. The on-chain prosperity doesn't translate to the coin price because the marginal buying is eaten up by ETF redemptions. $100 is the neckline; if the daily close breaks below it, the next support is $80.
ZEC is actually the most interesting today. In the past week, institutions have been stubbornly buying $42 million worth of spot against the trend, but the market has been slowly declining every day. The futures positions are overcrowded and have dropped 12%, with top whales holding over 90% of the short positions. To put it plainly: institutions are quietly accumulating in the spot market, while whales are blindly shorting in the futures market. The shorts are all packed in one car, paying interest to hold on hard; if the spot buying picks up even a bit more, these people will all become rocket fuel.
Wait for SOL to close around 100, and for ZEC neither chase longs nor touch shorts; wait for the short squeeze direction to emerge on its own. Don't be the one getting ground in the meat grinder. $BTC $ZEC $ETH Intel's Terafab Comeback: Why Elon Musk's Chip Factory Still Keeps Intel
Intel recently has a variable that's easy to overlook: Elon Musk's Terafab. On October 7, Intel CEO Chen Liwu publicly confirmed that Intel remains the core partner of this project; Musk also clarified that the factory is built and operated by his own company, and even if TSMC participates, it only subleases part of the site, not taking over.
Terafab's scale is considerable: Grimes County, Texas, with an initial investment of $16.8 billion, at least 3,000 jobs, and a goal of one terawatt of AI computing power per year. The chips have two production lines: one for Tesla's FSD, Optimus, and Cybercab using AI5 and AI6 chips, and the other for SpaceX's Starlink and space data centers using radiation-hardened D3 chips, with the process anchored on Intel 14A.
Intel's calculation is clear: the 14A design kit will be released in October, with the first chip targeted for late 2027 and mass production in 2028. Securing Terafab is the strongest endorsement for Intel's foundry comeback. But risks are also on the table: once TSMC subleases in, Intel's influence and order share could be diluted.
The chip foundry landscape is being reshuffled. Is Intel truly making a comeback this time, or continuing as a supporting player?
#IntelFoundryTransformationWelcomesTerafabNewVariable
$INTC $BTCThe October FOMC interest rate decision will be announced this week, and macro sentiment is very likely to dominate the short-term volatility rhythm. BCH is currently consolidating with low volume; I judge that before the decision, it will mainly fluctuate and accumulate strength. From the perspective of funds and sentiment, the funding rate is only 0.0016%, indicating that bulls are reluctant to chase highs. The open interest of 79,000 coin-based contracts combined with a 1-hour downtrend and a -3.24% distance from the high suggests that leveraged funds are moderately reducing positions, while the 4-hour distance from the low at 6.16% still maintains a rebound structure. The order book's top 10 buy-sell ratio is 0.75, with sell orders at 843 outweighing buy orders at 632. Support below 277.83 is thin, resistance near 282.8 is short-term, and 270.1 is a key support level. Strategy-wise, lightly buy on a pullback to 271.6 with a stop loss at 268.4 and a target of 281.3; if volume breaks below 270.1, reverse to a short position targeting 264.7 with a stop loss at 273.2. Single position size should not exceed 20%, and reduce holdings by half before the decision announcement.
——This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you successful trading.——
$BCH#本周将公布10月FOMC利率决议
#本周将公布10月FOMC利率决议
$BCH $T The bulls on the market are completely holding on stubbornly.
The coin price keeps dropping steadily, but the contract open interest has counterintuitively surged to 7.59 million dollars.
Those who chased the high are all stuck up there, refusing to cut losses no matter what, adding more as it falls.
They can't push it up again, and the bottom is piled with bulls holding on desperately. The resistance above is extremely heavy; it’s just a matter of when the whales will kick it down to trigger a chain reaction of stampedes.
#T
$T
👇Microsoft's Wednesday after-hours earnings report: Azure must deliver a 45% growth report card, AI monetization is the real test
Microsoft's earnings report after Wednesday's close boils down to one real question: Can Azure fulfill the management's guidance of about 45% constant currency growth? Bank of America expects 44.8%, corresponding to $32.3 billion, and the monetization status of Copilot also needs to be addressed.
The foundation from last quarter was actually solid: Azure nominal growth was 40%, Microsoft Cloud revenue rose 26% to $49.1 billion, commercial orders surged 112%, and backlog orders stood at $39.2 billion. But the stock price still fell because the capital expenditure guidance was sharply raised to about $190 billion, $55 billion above market expectations.
This is the classic dilemma for today's AI giants: demand truly exists, orders are lined up two to three years out, but every bit of growth requires burning real cash upfront. The market no longer only looks at growth rate but whether growth can cover depreciation and interest.
The reflection on the crypto space is also direct: AI compute stocks and crypto assets alike are being revalued based on whether "growth can make money." Microsoft's earnings report is basically a midterm exam for the entire AI narrative.
Are you betting on Azure exceeding expectations, or betting that the market will keep focusing on capital expenditure?
#MicrosoftAzureGrowth43%, Can AI Commercialization Accelerate?
$MSFT $BTCElon Musk's Latest Warning: Out of More Than 200 AI Cloud Providers, Only a Few Will Survive
On October 25, Musk personally confirmed on X: SpaceX has closed $40 billion in debt financing, used to buy GPUs from vendors like Nvidia, with delivery expected in Q1 and Q2 of 2027. But then he shifted tone and essentially sentenced the entire industry.
His original point was: In recent weeks, the bond market has almost completely cut off lending to companies "without decent revenue outside of AI data centers." SpaceX can borrow because it has investment-grade ratings and is supported by Starlink and launch services. But over 200 new cloud providers renting GPUs face massive bankruptcies and consolidations, with "only a few surviving."
This is the exact opposite of yesterday’s claim that "SpaceX is struggling to finance": it’s not that SpaceX can’t borrow, it’s that others can’t. CoreWeave, a leading new cloud provider carrying about $50 billion in debt, is the most typical contrast.
This AI infrastructure arms race is shifting from "who dares to borrow" to "who can repay." If the compute rental bubble bursts, the AI narrative and AI concept stocks in the crypto space will all shake hard.
Do you think this round of shakeout among new cloud providers is a bubble burst or a signal that the industry has peaked?
#SpaceX closes $40 billion financing, Musk warns of AI cloud credit cut
$BTC#SK Hynix Q3 earnings report is coming, can HBM4 boost profitability? $ETH dropped below 2300, who is going long, who is waiting for it to fall?
Down 1.9% in 24 hours, down 3.3% in 7 days, down 14.4% in 30 days!
Trading volume shrank from 8.37 billion on October 20 to 4.8 billion yesterday, and just over 1.5 billion today, no one is taking over!
But among smart money, two things are quite sharp:
Smart buying accounts for 56.99%, it looks like buying.
Look again: smart money long positions only account for 20.07%!
Buying is short-term holding, but the stance is on the bearish side.
And in all accounts, long positions account for 76.68%, top accounts 63.27%.
Retail investors crowd on the long side, smart money stands on the opposite side. Contract positions amount to 5.36 billion USD, with a slight increase of 1.24%.
In short: a slow decline, shrinking volume, retail holding longs, smart money shorting. This structure is not scary, but it wears you down.
If you want to go long, it is recommended to enter below around 2272, where liquidation intensity reaches 270 million USD, giving a great chance to catch a short-term rebound probability. The next ten days are full of major events. Is it still possible to chase BTC gains now?
The market has been quite subtle these past two days—not a one-sided rise, but more like a game of washout and consolidation. On the surface, sentiment looks good, but in reality, big money is quietly tightening risk controls at the bottom.
Check the calendar:
On the 27th, Israel elections;
On the 28th, the Federal Reserve meeting, coinciding with Google and Microsoft's earnings reports;
On the 29th, the European Central Bank decision;
On the 30th, the Bank of Japan decision;
On the 2nd, Apple's earnings report;
On the 3rd, the US midterm elections.
Almost every day in these ten days has a major event that can ignite capital sentiment. Such density alone calls for caution.
The key is not which news breaks out, but how much the market has already priced in. With US earnings and the Fed meeting overlapping, risk appetite will be set in one go; with the ECB and BoJ making consecutive moves, volatility will definitely spill over into the crypto space. In this environment, BTC is easily treated as a risk asset, while ETH and altcoins are more likely to see liquidity drained.
If earnings exceed expectations and the Fed leans dovish, there could be a quick rebound: BTC corrects, ETH follows, altcoins soar. But the risk is that with so many events packed together, capital prefers to deleverage and hold cash, making rebounds prone to becoming windows for selling at higher prices.
In short, these ten days are about game theory and washout, not a comfortable phase to chase gains. Positioning and timing matter more than direction—don’t get carried away by emotions, control your trades!Brothers, ZEC has dropped to 1185, but the ETF just recorded the strongest weekly inflow in six weeks
$ZEC $1,185
ZEC retraced from the high of 1698 at the end of September to around 1185, a drop of about 30%. The price is still consolidating, but the capital flow just showed a reversal signal.
ETF weekly inflow was $41.1 million, ending three weeks of outflows. As of the week of October 23, Grayscale ZCSH had a net inflow of $41.1 million, the strongest weekly performance since mid-September. Monday saw an outflow of $10.4 million, followed by four consecutive days of net inflows, with $20.5 million coming in on Friday alone. The first three weeks had a cumulative outflow of $143 million, and this wave recovered about 29%.
But price and capital are in conflict. On October 22, ETF net inflow was $14.23 million, but total net assets dropped from $745 million to $681 million, shrinking by $64 million in one day because ZEC’s price fell 10.64% that day. The ETF is buying, but the price is falling faster.
The NU7 date is locked in. Activation block height is 3,543,405, Zebra 7.0.0 node software has been released, expected to activate between November 5 and 6. Block time will be cut from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, and 60% of fees will be removed from circulation. ZEC in the old Sprout pool will be permanently unusable after the upgrade, holders have less than two weeks to transfer.
Technically, 1180-1190 is near the 50-day moving average; holding this level means consolidation and accumulation, breaking below points to 1100.
#本周将公布10月FOMC利率决议 BTC's 20-day low shifted down from 79,775 to 79,220, but the price rebounded to 80,933. Are these two signals contradictory—lower lows and price rebound? First, the news. Price side: BTC reported $80,933.5, +1.42% in 24 hours, -0.30% in the past week; 20-day range from 79,220.1 to 86,693.7—the low is $555 lower than last week. Capital side: ETF net inflow for the eighth consecutive day (+29.2 million), 5-day +202.3 million, 10-day +299.4 million. Sentiment side: Fear & Greed Index rose from 51 to 54. Macro side: Dollar 101.81, Gold 4,007.9 (-1.29%), S&P 500 7,623.68 (-0.52%). Next, the impact of capital. The lower low indicates selling pressure is still spreading—every rebound sees sellers. But the price rebound shows capital is absorbing—ETF's eight consecutive days of net inflow is proof. The two signals are not contradictory: they describe two sides of the same thing—sellers are offloading, buyers are absorbing, and both sides are repeatedly exchanging chips between 79,000 and 81,000. Implications for BTC: this "lower low + capital inflow" combination usually appears during the formation of a bottom area. To judge if the bottom is established, two key points: first, whether the low can stop moving down; second, whether capital inflow can continue. The first has not yet happened, the second has. I will next watch four indicators: first is 79,22 This week, global markets saw a surge in risk aversion, but traditional safe-haven assets experienced significant divergence. Gold fell below $4,000 per ounce on Friday, hitting a more than three-month low of $3,986.50, with a cumulative weekly decline of 4%. Meanwhile, the yield on the US 10-year Treasury note fell below 5% again after a month, becoming the most favored safe-haven destination; the Japanese yen rose to a one-year high against the euro, and the US dollar fell below the key support level of 157.50 against the yen to around 156.9. This divergence has sparked market doubts: is gold's safe-haven aura being eroded by its recent speculative nature? Market impact: reshaping the ranking of safe-haven assets, gold's unusual decline. Berenberg analysts pointed out that gold's decline amid risk aversion is a "noteworthy divergence." Typically, a decline in US Treasury yields is positive for non-yielding gold, but investors this week have been selling gold continuously while flocking to US Treasuries. The last time gold showed such weakness during a significant drop in Treasury yields was in December 2008, the deepest phase of the global financial crisis. Analysts believe gold's current weakness is closely related to its role as a speculative asset over the past year. This speculative boom pushed gold prices to a historic high of over $5,400 in January this year, but as related traders gradually exited, gold prices have since fallen by more than one-fifth. CME Group Chief Economist Erik Norland stated that the biggest driver of precious metals price declines this year is the market's shift in expectations from rate cuts to rate hikes. However, heFirst, consider the worst-case scenario: my speculation is that if sanctions expand and crypto channels are also restricted, the payment problem will persist. Reuters reported that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu proposed using cryptocurrency to counter potential sanctions, which was criticized by economists and political opponents.
I don't see this as a positive adoption: compliance restrictions and liquidity are risks, and a proposal does not mean the payment channel is available. Ordinary people can calculate the maximum loss based on "stop-loss not executed," rather than only considering the ideal exit price.
When encountering such sanction news, how much stop-loss do you usually set for a single transaction?Robinhood's report card tomorrow: On-chain revenue outperforms Ethereum, but stock price has fallen for six consecutive earnings reports
Robinhood released its Q3 earnings after the market closed on Tuesday, with market expectations of $1.41 billion in revenue and $0.56 earnings per share, representing a 16% year-over-year revenue increase. What's interesting is not these numbers, but that the earnings report for the first time fully includes the quarterly performance of Robinhood Chain.
According to ARK's data, this chain, which only went live on July 1, generated about $51 million in network revenue in Q3, surpassing Ethereum's $41 million in the same period. The cumulative DEX trading volume even exceeded $100 billion by mid-October. Of course, ARK also cautions that this high fee revenue may decline once congestion pricing is adjusted.
What’s even more painful is the stock price pattern: in the past six earnings reports, Robinhood beat expectations five times, yet the stock price fell each time; in July, despite beating expectations, it still dropped 3.6%. The stock price has fallen nearly 16% this year, and the options market is betting on about 10% volatility around earnings.
The takeaway for the crypto community is clear: brokers building chains and doing on-chain trading can really make money, but whether they make money or the stock price rises are two completely different matters.
Do you believe in Robinhood Chain as a "broker chain," or do you think it’s just a flash in the pan?
#CanRobinhoodTradingBusinessGrowthContinue?
$HOOD $BTCOil shipping has returned, but oil prices refuse to fall: What exactly is this high oil price afraid of?
Middle East crude oil exports have already returned to above pre-war levels. According to Kpler data, from October to now, Middle East crude oil exports averaged 17.3 million barrels per day, higher than 16.4 million barrels in September and also higher than 16.9 million barrels two months before the war started at the end of February; the flow through the Strait of Hormuz has also rebounded to 11.7 million barrels, about 82% of pre-war levels.
But Brent crude remains around $115, at a 5-month high. Last week, the UK maritime agency received 12 reports of attacks near Hormuz in one week, a record, and many shipowners do not report incidents at all. Tanker freight rates are even more outrageous, with VLCC daily hire rates approaching $1.4 million, and war risk insurance rising to 10% of cargo value.
In other words, oil is flowing, but the cost of flow has completely changed: US Navy escorted fleets sail close to the coast of Oman, one-third of ships still take the northern route controlled by Iran, and refined oil exports are only about 40% of pre-war levels. The market is not afraid of current supply cuts, but of the next round of escalation.
High oil prices drag on inflation and rate cut expectations, and the crypto space should not be a bystander: once energy inflation rises, the hawks at the FOMC become even more confident.
Do you think this high oil price is a risk premium that will eventually fall, or the start of a new normal?
#MiddleEastCrudeOilTransportRecoveryWhyAreOilPricesStillHigh
$BTCGold falling has instead made me start paying attention to opportunities.
Historically, gold has pulled back about 36% on average from its highs; currently, the retracement is about 29%. The double bottom pattern, $4,000 support, and RSI oversold conditions are all worth noting.
But statistical patterns are not a guarantee for bottom fishing; the true bottom can only be confirmed by the market.
The same logic applies to $BTC.OKX officially announced today at 11:20 two US stock X-Perp contracts, GEVUSD and NOWUSD, with openings at 16:30 and 16:45 respectively. GEV just dropped 11%, NOW rose 9.4% before earnings, and both companies have earnings on 10-28.
GEV is GE Vernova, an AI power stock. XGEV spot closed at 925.23 on 10-21, 825.58 on 10-22, down 10.8% in one day; and closed again at 809.30 on 10-23, down 12.5% over two days. The culprit is Meta: on 10-22, it turned free cash flow negative due to AI spending and dropped nearly 7%, causing AI power stocks to bleed collectively.
Money is in the order book: XGEV-USDT traded only 7.51 shares (about $6,120) in 24 hours, XNOW-USDT (ServiceNow) only 0.71 shares (about $113); yet the contracts opening at 16:30 are 20x leveraged and USD-settled, opening 5 hours earlier than the US stock market.
Are you betting in the Asian session on earnings two days later, on GEV’s $176 billion backlog or NOW’s 80x P/E? $BTC dropped from 84,050 to 79,431 (-5.5%) in three days; once this line breaks, both crypto and power stocks get hit together.The day we've been waiting for this week: FOMC decision on Wednesday, no rate hike is the real drama
From Tuesday to Wednesday tomorrow, the October FOMC meeting will take place, with the decision announced early Wednesday Beijing time. In a Reuters survey from October 16 to 20, 94 out of 100 economists believe the Fed will hold steady this time, keeping rates at 3.75% to 4.00%, which is basically the market consensus.
So the focus on Wednesday is not whether there will be a hike, but what the chair says. After the hot CPI in September, the market once priced the probability of an October hike above 50%, but the chair’s statement of "no forecast" pushed expectations back down. The real suspense now lies in December: futures markets price the December hike at about 80%, and the Reuters survey shows all 100 economists expect a hike in December.
For the crypto world, this script is very familiar: no rate hike does not mean a shift to easing, the boot of a December hike still hangs overhead. BTC just fell back below 80,000 today, and ETH is struggling around 2,300. At times like this, every word in macro commentary is magnified.
Will you stay up late to watch the decision early Wednesday, or wait until morning to act after seeing the results?
#OctoberFOMCRateDecisionComingThisWeek
$BTC$ETH $BTC $SOL This round of market pullback superficially looks like BTC losing the key 80,000 level, but essentially it is a chain reaction of institutional fund withdrawals combined with concentrated liquidation of long leverage positions.
The capital side had already weakened in advance: On October 22, the US stock BTC spot ETF saw a net outflow of $636 million in a single day, marking the largest single-day escape since June. In just two trading days, a total of $774 million was withdrawn, completely erasing all net inflows from early October.
The market then faced concentrated liquidation: Over 213,000 accounts were forcibly liquidated within 24 hours, with total network liquidation reaching $670 million, the vast majority being long positions.
Institutional buying has faded, and the market's long positions are highly crowded. Once the critical 80,000 support is broken, it naturally triggers a chain reaction of panic selling. Clearly, ETH's decline is much stronger than BTC's, indicating that market risk appetite is contracting rapidly and sentiment is collapsing faster than the price drop.
Approaching the Federal Reserve decision on October 28, although the market generally expects no change in the current stance, there remains divergence in December rate hike expectations and uncertainty about liquidity tightening.
The macro bearish tone remains unchanged. This round of correction is not a short-term emotional sell-off but the result of the resonance of capital, leverage, and macro factors.The next ten days might be the least suitable period in the year to chase rallies. Are you ready to face a series of intense macro events? Watching the market these past two days gives a very subtle feeling—the price is still fluctuating, but the rhythm is no longer a one-sided rally; it feels more like a phase of mixed game theory and position washing. The surface sentiment doesn't look bad, but underneath, risk appetite is tightening in advance. Let's lay out the calendar first. 10/27 Israel elections, 10/28 Federal Reserve meeting combined with Google and Microsoft earnings, 10/29 European Central Bank interest rate decision, 10/30 Bank of Japan interest rate decision, 11/2 Apple earnings, 11/3 U.S. midterm elections. Almost every day in these ten days has events that can change capital sentiment, and this density alone is worth caution. What I really care about is not which news will explode, but what the market has already priced in ahead of time. Having U.S. tech earnings and the Federal Reserve on the same day means risk appetite will be priced in all at once; the ECB and BOJ decisions on consecutive days mean exchange rate and carry trade volatility will spill over into the crypto market. In this environment, BTC is usually treated as a macro risk asset rather than a safe haven, while ETH and altcoins are more likely to lose their elasticity when sentiment contracts. There is also a bullish path: if earnings exceed expectations and interest rate paths turn dovish, suppressed risk appetite could quickly rebound, with BTC recovering first, ETH following, and altcoins taking over, making the pace very fast. But the risk is that when events are so dense, capital tends to deleverage first and hold cash rather than bet early, so rebounds can easily become windows for selling after a rally. $ETH now has an unavoidable source of selling pressure: Ethereum OGs are concentrating their sell-offs.
This group of early holders is very special; they sell during bull markets and continue to cash out in batches during bear market bottoming phases. They are almost always either selling coins or preparing to sell coins.
Their holding costs are extremely low, so even if the market drops significantly, they still have huge unrealized profits. As long as there is room for a rebound, they have the motivation to cash out.
As long as this portion of low-cost chips is not fully rotated or completely washed out, there will be a continuous selling pressure hanging above. Every rally can easily be crushed by sell orders from the OGs. One of the prerequisites for $ETH to achieve a smooth new high is to fully exchange this portion of cheap chips to newly entering funds.
Of course, the shakeout is not a matter of one or two days; this process will repeatedly tug and wear down patience. Short-term upward resistance will persist, so do not easily predict a one-sided breakout.
#微软Azure增长43%，AI商业化能否提速？ #谷歌云业务增长82%，AI投入回报如何？
The boss has something to say
Alphabet, Google's parent company, released its Q3 earnings after the US market closed on October 28. Cloud business grew by 82%, but the 2026 capital expenditure guidance was raised to $195 billion to $205 billion. This is an extremely large figure.
I believe the market's focus on Google's earnings report has shifted. It's no longer just about how much cloud revenue has increased, but whether this nearly $200 billion capital expenditure can bring actual returns. AI infrastructure is a money-consuming beast. Someone in the comments pointed out very accurately that Google is intensively signing long-term contracts for nuclear power fuel cells, and electricity might replace GPUs as the core bottleneck for AI expansion. Having computing power is useless without electricity.
The market reaction was lukewarm, with GOOGL down 0.09% and xGOOGL down 0.07%; funds are mostly waiting and watching.
For crypto, tech giants continue their arms race, funds remain in tech stocks, and BTC lacks external incremental support. The main factors to watch are macro conditions, oil prices, and the FOMC.
BTC took a waterfall drop last night; now it's a question of whether the 80,000 level can hold. If it doesn't, expect a deeper correction, with resistance above at 84,000 to 85,000. Don't chase the rally or sell in panic; set your stop losses properly.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; make sure to set your stop losses. Good luck. $BTC $ETH $ZEC The US stock market is a bit exciting this week, with the Federal Reserve and tech giants rushing to report earnings. It's really hard to say who will get hit first.
📅 October 27, HOOD reports earnings first.
📅 October 28, the Federal Reserve announces its interest rate decision, followed by Microsoft and Google after hours.
📅 October 29, US GDP and PCE data are released, and Amazon and COIN also have to report their results.
This time, I'm paying more attention to Microsoft.
Not because it will definitely rise, but because Wall Street's patience with AI is clearly not as good as before.
Meta's revenue exceeded expectations, yet its stock price still fell nearly 7%. Previously, the market got excited hearing about increased AI investment; now it’s starting to ask: when will the money invested pay off?
Microsoft and Google happen to be able to answer this question.
One looks at Azure, the other at Google Cloud. If cloud business growth can't meet market expectations, just talking about AI prospects probably won't be enough.
I'll also keep an eye on COIN, since its trading revenue is directly related to crypto market activity, which is also valuable reference for our crypto community.
I'm now more inclined to watch the real reaction after the earnings reports rather than betting in advance on who will beat expectations.
If I had to pick the most worth studying this week, I'd bet on Microsoft. $GOOGL $MSFT $AMZN #微软Azure增长43%，AI商业化能否提速？ $ZEC price is around 1190, with 24-hour fluctuations roughly between -0.3% and +4%, indicating high-level oscillation.
ZEC has recently outperformed BTC significantly. BTC dropped about 1%—1.6% in 24 hours, while ZEC's weekly chart shows an increase of about 7.5%, mainly driven by expectations for the NU7 upgrade and the privacy coin narrative.
From the chart perspective, the key battleground is near $1,200; resistance above is first seen at $1,230—$1,250, with stronger resistance at $1,300—$1,320; support is near $1,180, and if broken, attention should be paid to the $1,120—$1,100 area.
Fundamentally, the core catalyst for ZEC is the NU7 upgrade likely to activate around November 5: block time is planned to shorten from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, and 60% of the fees per block will be temporarily removed from circulation until February 2031, which is expected to tighten supply somewhat. However, the upgrade will also disable the old Sprout privacy pool, and a small amount of unmigrated funds may lose spendability, representing a low-probability but real technical risk.
On the capital side, the Grayscale Zcash ETF saw a significant inflow last week, but there were net outflows for three consecutive weeks prior, indicating institutional funds are still wavering. ZEC's volatility is much higher than BTC/ETH, so short-term chasing of highs should be cautious.
#本周将公布10月FOMC利率决议 With no new projections at the Oct. 28 decision, the Fed's statement and Chair's press conference will carry unusual weight. Unchanged rates may be broadly expected, but language on inflation and December matters because Q3 GDP and September PCE arrive the next day. That sequence could keep policy expectations fluid rather than settled.
#OctFOMCDecisionThisWeek In the futures market, contract delisting does not mean there is a problem with settlement; experienced traders often first look at the exit arrangements. I see Ducat's gradual protocol shutdown this time following the same logic: business operations need to be concluded, and how assets are returned requires a separate accounting.
The announcement states that bonds and Pass rewards that have been allocated, pDUCAT in pledge or cooling period, and circulating $DUCAT in wallets can all be redeemed without waiting for the cooling period. The snapshot of token-holding addresses has also been completed. The team claims that the liquidation certificate will fully support DUCAT with vault assets, but this is a claim to be verified and should not be taken as the liquidation result.
I value the exit mechanism more than simply labeling the shutdown as negative news: waiving the cooling period reduces exit restrictions; covering multiple holding states reduces rule fragmentation. Unlike traditional futures, here we need to look at the protocol's own liquidation arrangements. Are there friends who have also transitioned from traditional markets? How would you judge whether such an exit arrangement is orderly?#Robinhood交易业务增长能否延续？ I believe the growth of Robinhood's trading business is highly likely to continue, but the form of continuation is undergoing a structural shift—the growth engine is switching from the previously high-volatility crypto assets to a combination anchored by stocks and options, with prediction markets as the incremental breakout point. However, the sustainability of this shift depends on whether a key constraint can be broken: the increase in trading activity has not yet effectively translated into simultaneous growth in new users and net deposits. 86.83 is the highest point reached at 07:00, with only 80,977 contracts traded at that peak. To break it down, at 08:00, 213,609 contracts were traded, which is 1.3 times the combined volume of the previous two peaks.
The volume disparity is clear: no one is supporting the price above, but there are real sellers pushing it down below. However, it was bought back at 83.91 for 0.66 to close at 84.57, and the 24h low of 83.4 was not breached.
So currently, this is a box with money bet on both end$BLUR, $YGG, $SAND and these altcoins were once crazy too, all in the blockchain gaming sector or NFT sector, but now they are slowly dying, gradually going to zero. Similarly, many altcoins without real income are also slowly fading away. If a project cannot achieve breakeven after several years of development and has very few real customers, some are purely a Ponzi scheme, so relying solely on the coin to harvest retail investors is inevitable, and indeed it should have been delisted early. The current crypto space really doesn't need any new projects; I even feel that one or two new projects listed on exchanges per month are already oversupplied. Even the real trading volume of blue-chip coins like BTC, ETH, and SOL in the crypto space is pitifully low. If it weren't for futures propping them up, liquidity would be very poor. The crypto space needs to rest and recuperate; if this continues, there won't be many retail investors left.Elon Musk's post has 4.75 million views and 108,000 likes, but what it talks about is very straightforward: the same company, two systems, two sets of rules.
Starlink is a civilian commercial service with strict terms that prohibit its use in warfare. Starshield is a different system, managed by the U.S. government, and its usage is decided by them.
Last week, the Ukrainian military used the civilian Starlink link to control attack drones to strike targets, and this loophole was just closed. His point is that this is not news, just a redefinition of an existing boundary.
The latter part is even more worth noting: Starlink cannot be jammed or destroyed, and if it goes down, the front line immediately collapses. At the start of the 2022 war, when other communication means were destroyed or jammed, it held strong for those months.
This sounds like a threat, but essentially it’s about pricing power. Whoever can provide something irreplaceable has the leverage, even if they repeatedly claim they do not participate in decision-making.
The same applies in the market. Truly scarce infrastructure pricing is never just about cash flow; it also depends on whether things can function without it. There is not a single industry term in this text, but the logic is the same.
To judge whether something is valuable, don’t first look at the story; first consider how many people would immediately be in trouble if it disappeared tomorrow. Last week's overall data seems to show a net inflow of ETF funds, appearing to favor the bulls, but the actual market is extremely divergent and very weak. The first three days of the week saw continuous accumulation, with a large amount of capital entering to prop up prices, but on Thursday and Friday there were consecutive large-scale exits, erasing more than half of the gains and chips accumulated in the first two days in just two days. Especially with leading institutional funds like IBIT and FBTC leading the retreat, this point best illustrates the issue: current buying is purely trial positioning, with no intention of firmly increasing long-term holdings. Although buying appears on the surface, the support is particularly fragile and cannot withstand selling pressure at all. Looking at the current candlestick structure: the price is stuck stubbornly around 80,000, oscillating repeatedly, with the 24-hour volatility range compressed very narrowly. The resistance between 81,000 and 81,300 is extremely stubborn; every time the price rebounds to this level, it is immediately hammered down with no incremental volume to support it, and the bulls have no strength to push higher. Market indicators have all flattened out, funding rates are approaching neutral, contract leverage has not expanded, and overall market sentiment is fully cautious, with no one daring to actively open directional positions. However, there is no need to be overly pessimistic; the market has not completely deteriorated. The short-term strong support lies between 79,800 and 80,000, with institutional long-term base positions still underpinning the market. 79,600 is an even more critical defensive bottom line; as long as this level holds, the overall oscillation structure will not collapse. Currently, the biggest uncertainty in the market is entirely concentrated on Federal Reserve news. At this stage, bulls and bears are evenly matched with no clear trend. All market rises and falls are contract funds washing each other out, switching back and forth between bull traps and bear traps, making this kind of market the easiest to lose money in.#SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ 1. HBM4 mass production + AI long-term contract orders: HBM4 is a super high gross margin product, with long-term contracts locking prices for customers like Nvidia, with premiums far exceeding ordinary DRAM; this quarter, the shipment proportion of HBM continues to rise, which is the core driver for increasing profit margins
2. DRAM and NAND contract prices continue to rise: AI servers + ordinary PC and server demand resonate, with DRAM average prices rising significantly quarter-on-quarter
3. Product structure optimization: the proportion of high-margin HBM/high-end DRAM increases, diluting costs and raising overall net profit margin
❌ Negative factors (pressuring EPS, likely to result in No)
1. KRW to USD exchange rate fluctuations: KRW depreciation will compress USD EPS under the US-listed SKHY standard (this is the most easily overlooked risk)
2. HBM4 yield below expectations: if yield ramp-up is slow and HBM4 shipments fall short of expectations, gross margin will directly decline
3. Slowdown in spot price increases for memory, customer order cuts, or Samsung's volume increase causing price competition
4. Non-standard one-time gains are not counted as Normalized EPS, only core business profitability can be consideredNinety percent of people bet that the Federal Reserve won't move this week, but the market doesn't even have the strength to stand up.
The FOMC meets from Tuesday to Wednesday, with results released at 2 a.m. Beijing time on Thursday. The decision itself is no longer a variable.
What has changed is the latter part: a week ago, the bet was whether there would be a rate cut within the year; now it's whether there will be a hike in December. With oil prices in triple digits and sticky inflation, the option of a rate cut has been withdrawn. What’s lost is not just a rate change, but the hope that "it will loosen sooner or later."
Prices haven't broken through yet, but sentiment has already cracked. The fear and greed index dropped to 43, the lowest in three months, yet prices are still some distance from this week's lows—not because someone is selling off, but because no one is willing to buy.
A tougher challenge lies ahead: Google and Microsoft report after the market closes on Wednesday, Amazon after the market closes on Thursday, all squeezed between the decision and inflation data.
$BTC is stuck at 80,000, having touched 84,000 at its peak this week; $ETH was above 2,500 two weeks ago, but now can't hold above 2,300, with its relative price continuing downward.
The meeting only decides whether it jumps or not, not where it will jump.
#本周将公布10月FOMC利率决议 $BTC contracts fell to 79567 but bulls still hold strong: once the 79345 liquidity is lost, who would dare to treat oversold as a reversal?
What I see is not a bull counterattack, but the most familiar self-hypnosis in a weak range. BTC contracts are currently around 79567, down 0.68% since UTC midnight today, with a 24-hour low touching 79345. The price remains in a bearish moving average alignment, and the rebound has never managed to reclaim key resistance; the short-term RSI has entered oversold territory, which is precisely when people are most likely to mistakenly think "it can't fall further." But oversold is just a volatility state, not a pass to trend reversal.
What is more worrisome is that the recent funding rate is still positive, with top traders holding about 61.2% long positions by position value, and about 69.2% of all market accounts long. When most of the market is expecting a bullish candle to save positions, liquidity below 79345 is often more attractive. Open interest rose 0.31% in the past hour, but the price did not strengthen accordingly; this kind of combination looks more like increasing divergence rather than a healthy rally.
I always insist: you can choose not to be bullish, but if you are bearish, you should pay more attention to risk realization. However, this is not anyone's trading instruction. Temporary boosts from news cannot change the current structure. What bulls really need to prove is a volume-backed recovery, not to keep comforting themselves with "a rebound means reversal." Those who blindly bottom-fish, stubbornly hold longs, and fantasize that the market will inevitably recover—will they again treat 79345 as the last safety line this time? #Strategy Earnings Preview: BTC Book Gains Rebound Sharply
The Q3 book unrealized gain of about $21 billion is an actual accounting fact but is an "accounting echo" with limited signaling value;
What is more noteworthy is the capital allocation shift from "increasing BTC holdings" to "repairing capital structure."
Capital allocation shift: Q3 accumulation slowed significantly: only 334 BTC were added in the last week of the quarter, costing $28.7 million; during the same period, $176 million was spent on repurchasing STRC preferred shares, exceeding BTC purchase expenditure that week. STRC rebounded from a low of about $71 in June to about $99, showing initial success in support;
The consensus of "strong buying" indicates the market is pricing a race between Bitcoin's long-term trajectory and capital structure costs. If the coin price only fluctuates near the cost line, the book rebound is just a quarterly number swing.
1. Whether Bitcoin can stably operate above the $75,000 cost line, turning book gains from "quarterly swings" into "sustained positive spreads";
2. Whether the fund allocation between repurchasing STRC and increasing BTC holdings confirms the company’s shift from "unlimited BTC exposure increase" to "prioritizing capital structure repair."
The book rebound is real but signals are limited; the slowdown in BTC per share growth better defines the mid-term profile than the $21 billion unrealized gain. @OKX中文 @OKX星球 $BTC $xSTRC