Every decentralized system starts with a set of training wheels @idOS_network just happens to be honest about theirs. Right now, the idOS network runs in a permissioned mode, but it’s a deliberate stage, not a flaw. Here’s why 👇 ❯ Identity isn’t a free-for-all. Unlike DeFi protocols where anyone can spin up a node, identity infra handles encrypted personal data KYC credentials, FaceVectors, proofs of humanity. That means the first cohort of nodes must meet security, compliance, and uptime guarantees before going public. ❯ Current setup: node operators are vetted consortium members think exchanges, stablecoin issuers, or infrastructure partners who already comply with data handling laws. They host secure enclaves and MPC fragments to guarantee consistency while the network scales. ❯ Next phase: once reliability and governance tooling mature, permissioning relaxes. Staking-based admission replaces whitelisting. Users and delegators will choose which nodes secure their data, not the core team. ❯ Why this matters: permissioned ≠ centralized forever. It’s the same bootstrap pattern we saw in networks like Cosmos, Filecoin, and even early Ethereum testnets early control for safety, phased release for resilience. In practice: - Today = privacy + compliance guardrails. - Tomorrow = open participation + staking economics. The real decentralization test isn’t whether anyone can run a node now it’s whether the system can safely let go later. idOS seems to be designing for that moment instead of pretending it’s already here.