I might be the last one among my friends to take a close look at $GIZA. The advantages of @gizatechxyz are quite obvious; the technology is pretty good. Even someone who is not technically inclined can understand from the documentation that its framework is very complete and the ideas are comprehensive. The well-packaged farming agent is very convenient, and after reading the doc, I feel that even if I were to form a team to do on-chain farming, this would be the best approach. (Of course, in the future, it shouldn't be limited to USDC; there should be more room for farming with various tokens and public chains.) However, the disadvantages are also clear; the ceiling is not high enough. Currently, the highest APR for USDC on base is 7% (I mean, even 10Y has 4.3%), and the TVL it can support is not large, so there is also a ceiling on TVL growth. Currently, GIZA's emissions are quite high, and the investor team has a linear vesting period of 36 months, which means only those who buy the tokens are absorbing this part. The tokenomics attempts to use a portion of the agent's transaction fees for buybacks, but this seems a bit too dreamy in the short term. With a TVL of 3.4M, even if the annualized revenue is 10%, it would only earn users 340k a year; the fees can't exceed the users' earnings, right? What does 340k mean for a circulating supply of 25m or an FDV close to 300m?