Playing on BNB Chain brings bursts of happiness, but the inability to sustain the profit-making effect seems to be the biggest issue. 1. CZ and Yi Jie are deliberately avoiding direct interaction with projects, instead letting interns, official accounts, and others post some trending topics. However, most of the time, these are one-off events. It’s unclear whether the official team is monitoring token price trends, as posts rarely receive follow-up support. Suggestion: There could be more rhythmic interactions. For example, once a project gains traction, a series of official accounts could interact with it in a coordinated manner. Departments could hold meetings to align strategies. If that doesn’t work, external forces like BNB Chain and FourMeme could be leveraged. Alpha, as the endpoint for most projects, could be introduced later. 2. The official team is visibly supporting established projects that have gained traction, but the impact is not significant due to the lack of continuity. News releases cause a temporary price surge, but the momentum doesn’t last. Suggestion: BNB Chain’s fund purchases could be scheduled within a specific timeframe, such as once a week, allowing people to anticipate and plan. The fund could be divided into two parts to support both new memes and old memes. Buying into smaller pools of new memes could lead to greater price volatility and excitement, naturally encouraging high-risk investors to contribute to the ecosystem once they’re committed. 3. There are many insider relationships and high levels of market manipulation, creating an overly conspiratorial atmosphere. Projects with almost no real users often get listed on Alpha and even spot markets, as long as the creators are known. This benefits a small group of insiders while discouraging retail investors, who feel disconnected from these opportunities. Suggestion: I recommend that such insider information be shared with me. If not, I’ll resort to FUD. 4. PVP projects are dominated by a few individuals holding too many tokens, discouraging others from participating. If these individuals don’t secure positions at the bottom, they might launch a new project just to gain bottom-level access. Suggestion: It’s crucial to quickly identify and mark the addresses of these individuals and their associated wallets, showing the proportion of tokens they hold and issuing risk warnings. While this approach may not be entirely reasonable, it’s highly necessary—even unofficial efforts in this regard would be valuable.