The social content on this page ("Content"), including but not limited to tweets and statistics provided by LunarCrush, is sourced from third parties and provided "as is" for informational purposes only. OKX does not guarantee the quality or accuracy of the Content, and the Content does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to provide (i) investment advice or recommendation; (ii) an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold digital assets; or (iii) financial, accounting, legal or tax advice. Digital assets, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk, can fluctuate greatly. The price and performance of the digital assets are not guaranteed and may change without notice. OKX does not provide investment or asset recommendations. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. Please consult your legal/tax/investment professional for questions about your specific circumstances. For further details, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Warning. By using the third-party website ("TPW"), you accept that any use of the TPW will be subject to and governed by the terms of the TPW. Unless expressly stated in writing, OKX and its affiliates (“OKX”) are not in any way associated with the owner or operator of the TPW. You agree that OKX is not responsible or liable for any loss, damage and any other consequences arising from your use of the TPW. Please be aware that using a TPW may result in a loss or diminution of your assets. Product may not be available in all jurisdictions.
Celestia market info
Market cap
Market cap is calculated by multiplying the circulating supply of a coin with its latest price. Market cap = Circulating supply × Last price
Circulating supply
Total amount of a coin that is publicly available on the market.
Market cap ranking
A coin's ranking in terms of market cap value.
All-time high
Highest price a coin has reached in its trading history.
All-time low
Lowest price a coin has reached in its trading history.
ZKP @SuccinctLabs + CLOB @celestia = @hibachi_xyz
1. 체결 결과를 증명하는 오더북 DEX
그냥 오더북 DEX가 아니라, 오프체인에서 체결된 결과를 ZK 증명으로 만들어 온체인에 올림. 결과적으로 운영자가 임의로 체결 결과를 바꿀 수도 없고, 유저도 영지식 증명 기반으로 내 거래 상태를 온체인에서 검증 가능.
2. 빠른 속도와 완벽한 프라이버시
오더북 매칭은 오프체인에서 5ms 이내로 처리되고, 결과는 SuccinctLabs ZK Proof로 검증 후 온체인 기록됨. celestia 에 거래 데이터가 암호화되어 올라가니까, 포지션이나 전략 노출될 일 없음.
3. 안전한 자산 인출 구조
celestia 에 데이터를 암호화해서 기록함으로써, 탈중앙 데이터 가용성 + 출금 무결성까지 확보함. 서비스가 중단돼도 Celestia에 기록된 마지막 스냅샷을 복호화하면 자산 인출 가능. FTX같은 중앙화 거래소 붕괴 시나리오가 Hibachi에서는 구조적으로 불가능함.
1.12K
3
飞凡
Is $ETH ready for a crazy surge?
To conclude: Currently, there is potential for a meme-like surge driven by funds, but it relies on continuous incremental funding and narrative reshaping.
The conditions for an increase are in a rapid accumulation phase:
- ETF funding channels are opening up
- Regulatory pricing is gradually being established
- High staking/re-staking leads to a tightening of circulating chips.
Potential downward pressure is also on the rise:
- Burning rate is decreasing
- Net supply is re-inflating
- L2 diversion leads to L1 fees and narrative dilution.
Here’s a detailed interpretation:
First, $ETH currently has a certain incremental demand:
- Daily inflows of $700 million into U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs, with cumulative inflows in the tens of billions, show a trend of institutions and retail investors concentrating their positions through compliant channels.
- Several listed companies are migrating or adding $ETH positions from Bitcoin reserves, with most CT bloggers comparing $ETH to the early $BTC corporate allocation craze.
- The U.S. Congress is advancing several pieces of crypto legislation, boosting the risk premium across the entire digital asset category, facilitating institutional allocation.
Secondly, there is a supply-side tightening and a decrease in circulation:
- The staking ratio across the network has reached a historical high (around 28%-29%+), with circulating sellable chips continuously declining.
- The re-staking ecosystem (EigenLayer @eigenlayer, etc.) is increasing TVL, absorbing additional circulating chips and adding derivative yields, enhancing holding willingness.
- The corporate treasury model (BitMine, SharpLink, and others shifting to $ETH surplus allocation) further locks in liquidity.
The only current flaw is that the ETH L1 ecosystem narrative is failing, with 85% of ecological transactions having migrated to L2 (Base taking the majority; L2 fees are profitable).
Moreover, the success of L2 means scaled adoption, taking most of the traffic away from the L1 fee pool, leading to a decrease in L1 burning rate, resulting in net supply re-inflation/annual dilution rebound, and the deflationary effect of EIP-1559 cannot be automatically maintained.
This means that the upward drive for ETH is similar to BTC, supported purely by short-term capital injections. If the funding cannot be sustained, $ETH will definitely encounter resistance, with the biggest catalyst being the staking ETF.
If the staking ETF is approved, ETH is highly likely to surge to $4,000-$5,000 in the short term.
飞凡
$ETH continues to break through, and the project team is making efforts,
Let's summarize which altcoins might have positive price movements in the past few days.
1. $COIN / $AERO / $DEGEN and other Base ecosystem tokens, Base is currently the most active L2, and the official team has announced that there will be significant news released.
2. $MPL, Maple plans to launch a permissioned lending pool at Converge,
providing collateralized/structured credit channels for RWA, aiming to extend institutional-level credit to a regulated environment on-chain;
Converge has officially named the use cases for Maple's launch (including permissioned pools, RWA credit, and institutional yield access).
3. $SKY, Sky Ecosystem has partnered with Alchemy Pay, allowing users to purchase SKY and the stablecoin USDS directly using local payment methods like Visa and Apple Pay.
4. $POL, the Polygon Heimdall mainnet has gone live, achieving ~5s rapid finality (previously about 1-2 minutes) and enhancing bridge security and network stability; significant optimizations for payment, RWA settlement, and centralized exchange deposit/withdrawal experiences.
5. $UNI, on July 15, the Uniswap Foundation officially submitted the "Protocol Governance Upgrade" proposal draft, which will allocate a certain percentage of the 0.05% base fee of the protocol to UNI holders.
6. $TIA, the Celestia community proposal TIA-19 suggests reducing the annual inflation rate from 6% to 2.5%, along with a redistribution of on-chain staking rewards.
Show original
14.42K
30
Simon Dedic
This is either some of the worst reporting I’ve seen or (hopefully) just engagement farming:
1) Why would you just randomly claim we’re early Celestia investors, implying we’re biased and trying to shill our bags to dump on retail?
Do your homework, it’s not hard to verify that we’re clearly not.
We bought $TIA on the open market and are currently down like -40%. We’re still holding every single token and even bought more on the way down.
2) When I say this could potentially be a 50–100x from here, that’s not some guaranteed outcome, but a scenario we have conviction in and hence are willing to put real capital behind.
And for some of you short-termists with a horizon of a fruit fly: we actually operate on longer time horizons than 1–2 months.
Just because $TIA is down (and so are we) doesn’t mean the thesis is invalid. We’re investors, not traders.
3) I’ve never spoken to Bitget or anyone else, and I’ve certainly never given an interview about this.
If your “sources” are secondhand articles quoting Twitter posts, you may reconsider your job.
I share thoughts and opinions on Twitter. That’s it. Not financial advice.
If you’re blindly copy-trading tweets and are now down - that’s on you, same as I take on responsibility for my trades and don't blame it on anyone else.
But hey, appreciate the obsession with myself @nevlyfans, I guess.
nev
Can you trust crypto VC's?
I breakdown how they work, how regular people get dumped on + some ways to avoid the bad & find the good.
education = safety
8.23K
61
Trader Tim
$TIA
If you were on stream last week, then you saw I took this Celestia long live.
I still think 2.26-2.35 is possible, but if that flips I think it is entering a former range and could look really good. For the first time in a long time.
The current price of Celestia is $1.9530. Over the last 24 hours, Celestia has increased by +0.67%. It currently has a circulating supply of 713,717,322 TIA and a maximum supply of 1,135,822,904 TIA, giving it a fully diluted market cap of $1.40B. At present, Celestia holds the 51 position in market cap rankings. The Celestia/USD price is updated in real-time.
The rating provided is an aggregated rating collected by OKX from the sources provided and is for informational purpose only. OKX does not guarantee the quality or accuracy of the ratings. It is not intended to provide (i) investment advice or recommendation; (ii) an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold digital assets; or (iii) financial, accounting, legal or tax advice. Digital assets, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk, can fluctuate greatly, and can even become worthless. The price and performance of the digital assets are not guaranteed and may change without notice. Your digital assets are not covered by insurance against potential losses. Historical returns are not indicative of future returns. OKX does not guarantee any return, repayment of principal or interest. OKX does not provide investment or asset recommendations. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. Please consult your legal/ tax/ investment professional for questions about your specific circumstances.
By using the third-party website ("TPW"), you accept that any use of the TPW will be subject to and governed by the terms of the TPW. Unless expressly stated in writing, OKX and its affiliates ("OKX") are not in any way associated with the owner or operator of the TPW. You agree that OKX is not responsible or liable for any loss, damage and any other consequences arising from your use of the TPW. Please be aware that using a TPW may result in a loss or diminution of your assets.
Celestia is a modular blockchain network that enables developers to build scalable, secure, and interoperable decentralized applications (dApps). Celestia decouples the data availability layer from the execution layer, allowing each layer to be optimized for its specific purpose. This makes Celestia more scalable and efficient than traditional monolithic blockchains.
How does Celestia work?
Celestia works by separating the blockchain into two layers: the data availability layer and the execution layer. The data availability layer is responsible for storing and validating transaction data, while the execution layer is responsible for executing transactions and updating the state of the blockchain.
The data availability layer uses a sampling mechanism to ensure that all transaction data is available to all nodes on the network. This makes Celestia more secure than traditional blockchains, as it is more difficult for attackers to tamper with the transaction data.
The execution layer can be implemented using any type of virtual machine, which makes Celestia more flexible and adaptable than traditional blockchains. Developers can choose the virtual machine that best suits their needs, and they can even build their own custom virtual machines.
Celestia price and tokenomics
Celestia's native token is TIA. TIA is used to pay for transaction fees, secure the network, and participate in governance.
TIA has a total supply of 1 billion tokens. The tokens are allocated as follows:
26.8% - R&D and ecosystem
19.7% - Series A and B investors
17.6% - Initial core contributors
15.9% - Seed investors
12.6% - Future initiatives
7.4% - Genesis drop and incentivized testnet
TIA is currently trading at $2.38 (as of November 1, 2023). It has a market capitalization of $336.99 million.
About the founder
Celestia was founded in 2021 by Mustafa Al-Bassam and Ismail Mahmutovic. Al-Bassam is a former software engineer at Google, where he worked on the development of the WebAssembly virtual machine. Mahmutovic is a former software engineer at Facebook, where he worked on the development of the Novi digital wallet.
Celestia highlights
Scalability: Celestia is designed to be scalable to millions of transactions per second.
Security: Celestia uses a variety of security features to protect the network and its users, including proof-of-stake consensus, sharding, and fraud proofs.
Interoperability: Celestia is interoperable with other blockchains, which means that Celestia dApps and smart contracts can communicate and interact with dApps and smart contracts on other blockchains.
Flexibility: Celestia is a modular blockchain, which means that its different components can be upgraded or replaced without disrupting the entire network. This makes Celestia more flexible and adaptable than traditional monolithic blockchains.
Number of posts mentioning a token in the last 24h. This can help gauge the level of interest surrounding this token.
Contributors
Number of individuals posting about a token in the last 24h. A higher number of contributors can suggest improved token performance.
Interactions
Sum of socially-driven online engagement in the last 24h, such as likes, comments, and reposts. High engagement levels can indicate strong interest in a token.
Sentiment
Percentage score reflecting post sentiment in the last 24h. A high percentage score correlates with positive sentiment and can indicate improved market performance.
Volume rank
Volume refers to post volume in the last 24h. A higher volume ranking reflects a token’s favored position relative to other tokens.
In the last 24 hours, there have been 8.2K new posts about Celestia, driven by 4K contributors, and total online engagement reached 3.4M social interactions. The sentiment score for Celestia currently stands at 83%. Compared to all cryptocurrencies, post volume for Celestia currently ranks at 1561. Keep an eye on changes to social metrics as they can be key indicators of the influence and reach of Celestia.
Powered by LunarCrush
Posts
8,193
Contributors
3,988
Interactions
3,436,959
Sentiment
83%
Volume rank
#1561
X
Posts
6,588
Interactions
2,174,699
Sentiment
89%
Celestia FAQ
How much is 1 Celestia worth today?
Currently, one Celestia is worth $1.9530. For answers and insight into Celestia's price action, you're in the right place. Explore the latest Celestia charts and trade responsibly with OKX.
What is cryptocurrency?
Cryptocurrencies, such as Celestia, are digital assets that operate on a public ledger called blockchains. Learn more about coins and tokens offered on OKX and their different attributes, which includes live prices and real-time charts.
When was cryptocurrency invented?
Thanks to the 2008 financial crisis, interest in decentralized finance boomed. Bitcoin offered a novel solution by being a secure digital asset on a decentralized network. Since then, many other tokens such as Celestia have been created as well.
Watch this video to learn about what happens when you move your money to a crypto exchange.
ESG Disclosure
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.
Asset details
Name
OKCoin Europe Ltd
Relevant legal entity identifier
54930069NLWEIGLHXU42
Name of the crypto-asset
Celestia
Consensus Mechanism
Celestia is present on the following networks: Celestia, Injective, Osmosis.
Celestia employs a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, wherein validators are selected based on the amount of TIA tokens they stake. These validators are responsible for ordering transactions and ensuring data availability within the network.
Injective operates on a Tendermint-based Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus model, ensuring high throughput and immediate transaction finality. Core Components: Tendermint-based Proof of Stake (PoS): Ensures instant transaction finality and supports efficient block production for high-speed transactions. Validator Selection: Validators are chosen based on the amount of INJ tokens staked, considering both self-staked and delegated tokens, to maintain a decentralized network. Delegation: INJ holders can delegate their tokens to validators, earning a share of staking rewards while participating in network governance. Instant Finality: The Tendermint consensus mechanism provides immediate finality, ensuring transactions cannot be reversed once validated.
Osmosis operates on a Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, leveraging the Cosmos SDK and Tendermint Core to provide secure, decentralized, and scalable transaction processing. Core Components: Proof of Stake (PoS): Validators are chosen based on the amount of OSMO tokens they stake or are delegated by other token holders. Validators are responsible for validating transactions, producing blocks, and maintaining network security. Cosmos SDK and Tendermint Core: Osmosis uses Tendermint Core for Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus, ensuring fast finality and resistance to attacks as long as less than one-third of validators are malicious. Decentralized Governance: OSMO token holders can participate in governance by voting on protocol upgrades and network parameters, fostering a community-driven approach to network development.
Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees
Celestia is present on the following networks: Celestia, Injective, Osmosis.
The native token, TIA, serves multiple roles within the Celestia ecosystem. Validators earn rewards in TIA for participating in the consensus process and maintaining data availability. Users pay transaction fees in TIA when submitting data to the network.
Injective incentivizes network participation through staking rewards and a unique transaction fee model that supports long-term value for INJ tokens. Incentive Mechanisms: Staking Rewards: INJ holders earn rewards for staking their tokens, encouraging active participation in securing the network. Validator Rewards: Validators receive staking rewards and transaction fees for processing transactions and maintaining network security. Applicable Fees: Transaction Fees: Users pay fees in INJ tokens for network transactions, including smart contract execution and trading. Fee Structure: A portion of transaction fees is burned via a weekly on-chain auction, reducing the overall supply of INJ tokens and supporting a deflationary tokenomics model.
Osmosis incentivizes validators, delegators, and liquidity providers through a combination of staking rewards, transaction fees, and liquidity incentives. Incentive Mechanisms: Validator Rewards: Validators earn rewards from transaction fees and block rewards, distributed in OSMO tokens, for their role in securing the network and processing transactions. Delegators who stake their OSMO tokens with validators receive a share of these rewards. Liquidity Provider Rewards: Users providing liquidity to Osmosis pools earn swap fees and may receive additional incentives in the form of OSMO tokens to encourage liquidity provision. Superfluid Staking: Liquidity providers can participate in superfluid staking, staking a portion of their OSMO tokens within liquidity pools. This mechanism allows users to earn staking rewards while maintaining liquidity in the pools. Applicable Fees: Transaction Fees: Users pay transaction fees in OSMO tokens for network activities, including swaps, staking, and governance participation. These fees are distributed to validators and delegators, incentivizing their continued participation and support for network security.
Beginning of the period to which the disclosure relates
2024-07-17
End of the period to which the disclosure relates
2025-07-17
Energy report
Energy consumption
77920.20000 (kWh/a)
Energy consumption sources and methodologies
The energy consumption of this asset is aggregated across multiple components:
For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called 'bottom-up' approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts.
To determine the energy consumption of a token, the energy consumption of the network(s) injective, osmosis is calculated first. For the energy consumption of the token, a fraction of the energy consumption of the network is attributed to the token, which is determined based on the activity of the crypto-asset within the network. When calculating the energy consumption, the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) is used - if available - to determine all implementations of the asset in scope. The mappings are updated regularly, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts.
Socials