Publikovat

The core idea is BTC is showing price resilience, but the supporting demand picture is still mixed. 🟠 1. BTC holding $64K is positive — but not confirmation Bitcoin recently recovered from the ~$62.5K area and moved back toward $64K. That matters because buyers are still defending the lower end of the current range. However, BTC has spent much of August inside roughly $62K–$65K, with rallies repeatedly losing momentum near the upper boundary. So $64K currently looks more like range recovery than a confirmed breakout. 💰 2. ETF flows are the important divergence The ~$385M figure is legitimate for the latest reported weekly period: U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded about $385.2M of net outflows through August 14, reversing the previous week's roughly $865M inflow. That's important because ETFs have become a significant source of spot BTC demand. But there's an important update: August 17 itself showed a strong reversal, with Farside data showing approximately $297.5M of net inflows across U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. So I would describe the situation as: Weekly flows = bearish/weak Latest session = encouraging Trend = not confirmed yet That's more nuanced than simply saying “ETF flows are negative.” 🧲 3. Why BTC can hold despite ETF selling Price doesn't need ETF inflows every day to remain stable. Other buyers can absorb supply: Spot-market buyers Long-term holders OTC/institutional demand Derivatives positioning Short covering Reduced selling pressure Therefore, BTC holding $64K despite recent ETF withdrawals is actually a relative strength signal. The question is whether that strength can continue if fresh liquidity doesn't expand. 📊 4. $65K is the immediate technical test The $65K area is becoming important because BTC has repeatedly struggled to establish a sustained breakout above it. I'd separate the levels like this: $62K–$63K → major near-term support zone $64K → recovery/neutral zone $65K+ → breakout confirmation A clean move above $65K isn't enough by itself. Ideally you'd want: