On the topic of banks and stablecoins, I've found myself wondering more and more about the role for tokenized deposits.
To start, there is no real definition today for "tokenized deposit," and different bank implementations will likely look different – transaction size limits, KYC requirements, walled gardens vs. partner gardens, etc. But banks from @jpmorgan to @HSBC to @UBS are all working on them.
Do consumers care whether transactions are decentralized? Whether they are build on an open vs. closed protocol? Is decentralization a core payments feature for the mass-market?
Early internet users expected peer-to-peer commerce to disrupt legacy merchants.
Nobody anticipated @Amazon Marketplace.
Will private chains and bank chains end up playing a similar role, dominating blockchain payments volume, while permissionless chains move to the fringe?
If you're a consumer trying to move money from Point A to Point B and JPMD <> PYUSD lets you do that, do you care?
2,129
12
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。