Polygon @0xPolygon 创始人 sandeep，听到了社区的声音，因为把matic这个名字修改成pol后，可能带来了新品牌不如老品牌被更多人认可的问题。确实，其几天我写了polygon的一些zk贡献的推文，就有人说这个事（如下图）。但是看了他这个推文下面大部分认为向前走不要回头，继续建设pol品牌。但是matic在上一轮太成功了，品牌认知度很高，并且在中文区大家都叫 “马蹄链” 这种更容易传播的名字。改成pol后，中文区有对应pol的名字么，好像没有。即使不改回来，可能在品牌传播上也要做很多工作来铺垫这次更改，但团队好像并没有做这方面的工作。
Thought Experiment:
Time and again, I keep hearing from folks in the Polygon trading community that MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker — it had history, recognition, and stuck in people’s minds.
So here’s an honest question: should we ask exchanges to revert just the ticker back to MATIC?
My stance so far has been: it’s too much churn. We migrated to POL, let’s stick to it — enough people know it now, specially on CT.
But the counter-argument I keep getting is: “the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went.” And that, projects shouldn’t be making decisions based on what CT thinks — it represents <5% of total crypto trading population.
I’m genuinely curious what the broader community thinks, because this feedback keeps coming up. No guarantees that exchanges would even agree to a revert — but who knows, it might be a trivial update on their end.
2,020
16
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。