Polygon @0xPolygon 创始人 sandeep,听到了社区的声音,因为把matic这个名字修改成pol后,可能带来了新品牌不如老品牌被更多人认可的问题。确实,其几天我写了polygon的一些zk贡献的推文,就有人说这个事(如下图)。但是看了他这个推文下面大部分认为向前走不要回头,继续建设pol品牌。但是matic在上一轮太成功了,品牌认知度很高,并且在中文区大家都叫 “马蹄链” 这种更容易传播的名字。改成pol后,中文区有对应pol的名字么,好像没有。即使不改回来,可能在品牌传播上也要做很多工作来铺垫这次更改,但团队好像并没有做这方面的工作。
Thought Experiment: Time and again, I keep hearing from folks in the Polygon trading community that MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker — it had history, recognition, and stuck in people’s minds. So here’s an honest question: should we ask exchanges to revert just the ticker back to MATIC? My stance so far has been: it’s too much churn. We migrated to POL, let’s stick to it — enough people know it now, specially on CT. But the counter-argument I keep getting is: “the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went.” And that, projects shouldn’t be making decisions based on what CT thinks — it represents <5% of total crypto trading population. I’m genuinely curious what the broader community thinks, because this feedback keeps coming up. No guarantees that exchanges would even agree to a revert — but who knows, it might be a trivial update on their end.
2,013
16
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。