5 天前
This is still subsidized, by the way. Hope everyone who aped into this at 40% and 20% and 15% are monitoring it 🫠
As pointed out before, the risk here is illiquidity. There’s no incentive for the one large borrower to repay, and they also control all the parameters (hence manual adjustments of yield ever lower to a target range that’s absurdly low).
So once other depositors withdraw and utilization gets high, you’re stuck until new depositors show up.
6 天前
Checking in on this special vault to lend against SKY, the (still subsidized!) yield has now been manually adjusted down to 10%.
It’s amazing to me for people to lend into a market dominated by a single borrower with no history of repayment (so liquidity likely only comes from new depositors), who also controls the oracle, liquidation, LTV, and interest rate parameters. Especially with the interest rate they pay being manually adjusted from 20% to 10% over the last three days!
The spread between sUSDS and stUSDS is a mere 550 bps and still not at its unsubsidized or equilibrium rate. That there are people in this makes me think that yield opportunities at scale (>$5m) must be getting scarce. Because as lopsided as the risk-reward is, it’s always against a standard of “compared to what”
The top lender appears to be Fasanara, who are presumably monitoring liquidity.
Ooooh. New development from the King. Imagine trying to loop this stuff and getting burned as a borrower when the USDS you’re being paid suddenly becomes volatile SKY tokens.
8,338
27
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。