4 天前
This is still subsidized, by the way. Hope everyone who aped into this at 40% and 20% and 15% are monitoring it 🫠
As pointed out before, the risk here is illiquidity. There’s no incentive for the one large borrower to repay, and they also control all the parameters (hence manual adjustments of yield ever lower to a target range that’s absurdly low).
So once other depositors withdraw and utilization gets high, you’re stuck until new depositors show up.
5 天前
Checking in on this special vault to lend against SKY, the (still subsidized!) yield has now been manually adjusted down to 10%.
It’s amazing to me for people to lend into a market dominated by a single borrower with no history of repayment (so liquidity likely only comes from new depositors), who also controls the oracle, liquidation, LTV, and interest rate parameters. Especially with the interest rate they pay being manually adjusted from 20% to 10% over the last three days!
The spread between sUSDS and stUSDS is a mere 550 bps and still not at its unsubsidized or equilibrium rate. That there are people in this makes me think that yield opportunities at scale (>$5m) must be getting scarce. Because as lopsided as the risk-reward is, it’s always against a standard of “compared to what”
The top lender appears to be Fasanara, who are presumably monitoring liquidity.
Ooooh. New development from the King. Imagine trying to loop this stuff and getting burned as a borrower when the USDS you’re being paid suddenly becomes volatile SKY tokens.
8,329
27
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。