Agree, if you aren't even trying to be "credibly decentralized" then there is a lot of value to on-chain dispute process that you can engage in to recover funds
Right now we sort of have "worst or both worlds" in that assets can be frozen, but no credible dispute process exists
re: the yETH hack:
at this point I actually really wish Circle/Coinbase would truly lean into something like ERC20-R with an appropriately well fleshed out (non-kangaroo-court) dispute resolution procedure etc.
no one is going to get a court order over $200k worth of cbETH or USDC, yet this can be a meaningful amount to whoever lost it
the asset is totally centralized, crypto broadly speaking is getting "fintech-ized" all over the place anyway
in light of these factors it should be possible to reverse an illicit transaction at relatively low-cost (lower than conventional U.S. court system) and without killing crypto's advertised benefits, but centralized asset issuers still demand court orders and haven't invested into ADR-based reversibility
Even better if it can be automated!
E.G. Circle can freeze a hacker's balance automatically in response to a hack, and then (later on) publish a merkle tree of the balances pre-hack
Then you can go in and prove your membership in that tree, burn it, and have tokens re-issued
1,754
8
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。