Sky misconfigured the replacement pool as well apparently. The comment below is part of a proposal to fix the second pool.
As noted elsewhere, the Sky Frontier Foundation appears to be one of the largest borrowers and just sitting in sUSDS (so a very large negative carry trade with 38% borrow rate)
That’s $16m of liquidity right there that could be returned to help unblock this market and you have to wonder why a Foundation is paying so much money while contributing to the logjam.

Execution risk is real, even for experienced teams.
In an effort to provide exit options to embattled stUSDS depositors, Sky set up a Curve pool and added 500k of USDS rewards. Unfortunately the pool is misconfigured, so a new pool with another 500k USDS rewards had to be spun up.
$500k mistake. As a reminder, stUSDS is a yield bearing deposit backed only by SKY tokens, where utilization has remained persistently at 100% despite 35% APY.
There is also a proposal on the Curve forum to change the pool fee from 1 basis point to 100 bps, since the pool is specifically intended to support liquidity for a distressed asset.
Depositors have consistently fled stUSDS since the initial 40% rate was ratched down sub-5%. Despite bone-crunching rate hikes to attract deposits back to the market, depositors have not outpaced withdrawals as stUSDS holders have fled.
Notably, the largest borrower also controls Sky governance and has announced that the liquidation threshold will drop from 145% LTV to 120% LTV, in a move that can’t be helpful to slowing depositor flight.
0 out of 5 stars. Do not recommend. Avoid stUSDS.
1,414
4
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。

