Most chains subsidize growth. Abstract recycles it.
And that one design shift might outlast every token incentive in crypto.
Let me show you why Panoramic Governance is the most overlooked breakthrough in Web3 economics: 👇🧵
1/ Everyone’s chasing points, yield, and airdrops.
Meanwhile, Abstract is doing something different:
> Paying builders in real protocol revenue not speculative emissions.
> No tokens printed. No grants. Just live value routing.
> And CT is missing it.
2/ Let’s talk about how most L2s grow:
Arbitrum → 50 million $ARB STIP emissions
Optimism → Quests + OP farming
Base → RetroPGF, points metas
ZkSync → "Farming but trust us" incentives
It works short-term…
But it’s a game of burn → hope → repeat.
3/ Abstract said: what if we just…paid people using real usage?
That’s where Panoramic Governance comes in:
An incentive engine powered by sequencer fees not token inflation.
- No promises. No begging.
- Just value in → value out.
4/ Here’s how it works:
i/ Users interact with apps
ii/ Each tx pays a sequencer fee
iii/ Fees go into a shared pool
iv/ Governance decides where it flows:
- Games
- Builders
- Creators
- Ecosystem tools
Real money. Real routing. In real time.
5/ It’s like if Uniswap fees went back to protocols building on top of it.
Or if Apple let devs vote on where App Store profits go.
Abstract is creating a live revenue feedback loop not one-time grants.
That’s regenerative crypto.
6/ Let’s be blunt:
Most chains say “stick around and we’ll reward you later.” Abstract says “if you create value today, you earn from it today.”
No emissions. No retroactive clout.
Just plug-and-earn.
7/ Here’s the loop that makes it work:
> Apps bring users
> Users generate fees
> PG rewards high-impact apps
> Apps improve → attract more users
> Ecosystem grows organically
It’s not farming.
It’s value compounding.
8/ So why isn’t CT talking about this?
Because we’re trained to think “governance = slow”
And “fees = boring”
But on Abstract:
> Governance = live capital allocator
> Fees = programmable ecosystem fuel
> Builders = revenue partners, not expense lines
9/ If you're chasing yield, go farm.
If you're building a real product, go where value is recycled not extracted.
Abstract isn't a chain you build on.
It’s a chain you build with. ✳️
👇 RT + reply if you find this thread useful
Thank you
5,09 mil
0
O conteúdo apresentado nesta página é fornecido por terceiros. Salvo indicação em contrário, a OKX não é o autor dos artigos citados e não reivindica quaisquer direitos de autor nos materiais. O conteúdo é fornecido apenas para fins informativos e não representa a opinião da OKX. Não se destina a ser um endosso de qualquer tipo e não deve ser considerado conselho de investimento ou uma solicitação para comprar ou vender ativos digitais. Na medida em que a IA generativa é utilizada para fornecer resumos ou outras informações, esse mesmo conteúdo gerado por IA pode ser impreciso ou inconsistente. Leia o artigo associado para obter mais detalhes e informações. A OKX não é responsável pelo conteúdo apresentado nos sites de terceiros. As detenções de ativos digitais, incluindo criptomoedas estáveis e NFTs, envolvem um nível de risco elevado e podem sofrer grandes flutuações. Deve considerar cuidadosamente se o trading ou a detenção de ativos digitais é adequado para si à luz da sua condição financeira.