am i the only one who shorted the Uniswap fee switch here? why:
• no mention of fees earned directed to buybacks, only forward fees. they cover rewarding existing holders with retroactive burn only.
• adding 5bps at protocol layer changes the routing science and reduces volume
• removing frontend fees which were 3x-5x the new 5bps protocol fee may not mean more revenue imo
• LPs now get paid less 20-25% less as protocol fee is intro'ed. will liquidity stick around?
• basically been losing market share on all chains that matter
• see relative math with Jupiter as a comp where flywheel has been active
im sure gauntlet and uniswap did the math though. from my perspective, 5bps feels like the highest they could go at a protocol level without getting rekt on flows/revs. else why wouldn't they have gone higher? why didn't uniswap show their homework (the math) in the governance post?
FWIW i paired my UNI short with a long on JUP. awaiting threadooors and number crunchers to punt me out of the trade.
7.88K
28
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.