Starknet's ultimate realization: privacy + scalability + programmability
Achieving large-scale privacy without compromising composability and verification speed
STARK may break the limits
Achieving complete privacy at the execution level requires significant coordination + UX trade-offs
It's time to consider adding privacy features to Starknet.
This is where things get interesting.
If Zcash represents encrypted Bitcoin, and Starknet is aiming to be a scalable, programmable Bitcoin L2, then the intersection of privacy + scalability + programmability might finally be within reach.
Can privacy at scale truly exist without compromising composability and verification speed?
STARKs seem like the best shot we’ve got but implementing full privacy at the execution level introduces massive coordination + UX tradeoffs.
If Starknet does it right, it might not just be “encrypted Bitcoin.”
It could be the foundation for a private programmable internet of value.
So yes maybe it is time to consider adding privacy to Starknet.
The question is: how deep should it go protocol level or application layer?
1.87K
0
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.