Sonic price

$S || In demand zone✅ If $BTC holds here, we could see a 30–50% move. Trade with me on MEXC (no KYC required):

Trying to wrap your head around what @veda_labs is? Here’s the 5-minute breakdown I know you need on: what it is, how it works, and why it’s quietly becoming a foundational layer for yield across DeFi. Let’s dive in 👇 At its core, Veda is infrastructure. Not a flashy app, not a points campaign machine, but the backend yield engine already powering colossus, like etherfi vaults, Mantle’s cmETH, Lombard’s LBTCv, and others. Actually....You might have used it without even realizing it! The problem it solves is simple: most protocols and chains want to offer users embedded yield, but building that infra in-house is complex, risky, and distracts from their core mission. Veda steps in with tokenized vault infrastructure that abstracts strategy management, yield rebalancing, risk constraints, and capital allocation, all wrapped into plug-and-play vaults. Protocols plug in Veda vaults to offer composable, tokenized yield, across ETH, BTC, USD, and altcoin primitives. Veda now secures over $2.7B in TVL, while being also the biggest on Defillama's "Onchain capital allocator" category, with major deployments in: - cmETH vaults ($545M) - liquidETH ($505M) - eBTC BTC vaults ($397M) - LBTCv by Lombard ($163M) - weETHs and sETHFI vaults (In case u want to dive deeper: ETH-based assets make up 65%+ of total vault deposits, but Veda’s BTC and USD vaults are growing fast, with $710M in BTC strategies and $42M in USD yield vaults. Importantly, Veda’s not limited to one chain. Vaults are deployed across Ethereum, Solana, Berachain, Base, Arbitrum, and more, with funds routed into protocols like Symbiotic, Karak, Aave, Uniswap, and wrapped BTC markets. From what I’ve seen, their edge comes from 3 things: → Verifiable constraints (vaults can only do whitelisted actions) → Cross-chain flexibility → Proven track record in managing blue-chip vaults at scale Whether it’s @SonicLabs, Rings , or @ether_fi, most teams I’ve spoken with use Veda to focus on UX and adoption, while delegating yield engineering to a team with the bandwidth and audit history to back it. Some might even say that it feels like Veda is shaping up not only to be DeFi’s yield middleware but also its vault infrastructure can be used to create any type of structured DeFi product, which, in my opinion, is one of the pieces that connects real protocols with real yield, without exposing users to hidden risk or janky wrappers. PS: eBTC is the first ever vault token to go live on Aave And as L2s, RWAs, and restaking assets start embedding native yield by default, Veda might just become a core dependency layer. One you don’t see, but that everything runs on.

Gambling games (Increase the trading volume of S token) Dev transfers 3% tokens to gambling contracts Transfer 0.001BNB to gambling contract within 24 hours: 0xD84745b0FA50C339dDd13ce3a6EF5D15C0dA2B8e will record the address All BNB transfers automatically repurchase S to

Author: Yue Xiaoyu Recently, I have seen a lot of tweets about Sonic, which shows that Sonic's ecology is still relatively hot, and naturally there are many opportunities. Sonic (formerly known as Fantom), as a veteran Layer 1 public chain project, has been in the spotlight for its high performance and innovation in the last bull market. Now, Sonic is back with a new brand and technology upgrades, and has embarked on a very large-scale, long-term airdrop program. Some friends may be worried about whether this wave of large-scale airdrops will have an impact on the price of $S, so let's briefly analyze it here: 1. Controllable selling pressure: the market impact can be quantified The 47.625 million $S released by the airdrop in the first quarter accounted for only 1.5% of the total supply, and Sonic's burning mechanism and fNFT market further weakened the selling pressure. Fantom (the predecessor of Sonic) has an average daily trading volume of about $250 million. Even though the initial sell-off accounted for 10% of the trading volume, the average daily selling pressure was only about $25 million, which was much lower than the market's ability to absorb it. 2. Ecological outbreak: strong internal support Sonic's TVL has surged from $26 million in early 2024 to $1 billion (May 2025), which, along with the onboarding of top DeFi protocols such as Aave, Silo, Euler, Shadow, and more, has cemented Sonic's position as a DeFi hub. Sonic's FeeM model, which refunds 90% of network fees to developers, is a reversal of traditional Layer-1 revenue distribution, similar to Airbnb's incentives for hosts. This model appeals to a large number of dApp developers. The explosion of the ecosystem will create continuous demand (such as transaction fees, staking, and governance) for $S, and support the long-term rise of the currency price. 3. Differentiated competition in the Layer 1 track Sonic's SonicVM and sub-second determinism are unique among EVM-compatible chains. Compared to Solana (non-EVM, which has a steep learning curve for developers) and Arbitrum (which is slightly less performant), Sonic finds a balance between performance and compatibility. Sonic's rebranding (from Fantom to Sonic) is not just a name change, it's a strategic upgrade. Referring to Polygon's 30% increase in market capitalization following the MATIC to POL upgrade, Sonic's repositioning triggers a market revaluation. To sum it up In general, the selling pressure of the airdrop is limited, and the price fluctuations of $S may show a trend of "first suppressing and then rising" in the early stage of the airdrop. After a short-term correction (5-10%), ecological growth and the market narrative are expected to drive the price into an upward channel. Sonic's ecosystem is still relatively active, and there are also airdrop opportunities, which are worth paying attention to for a long time.

SonicLabs is positioned well for these developments. Continued growth within the ecosystem is anticipated.