Listen to @DesheShai and draw your own conclusions.
$kas, pay attention. Withdrawal costs from various L2s to the base layer: - Optimism: Gas + data cost - Arbitrum: Gas + data cost - Base: Gas + data cost - zkSync Era: Gas + data cost - Polygon: Gas + data cost - Scroll: Gas + data costs - Linear: Gas + data costs - Kasplex: 0.5% of the withdrawn amount They are pocketing 0.5% of all Kaspa deposited on Kasplex. Why? One answer I expect is that this money doesn't go to Kasplex, but to Kurve, which is a separate bridging service and priced as such. To this I say: - It is owned by the same people! - It is exclusive. There is no competition in the Kasplex-Kaspa bridging, and there couldn't be any before Kasplex is open-sourced. For that reason only, bridging should be free or at execution costs, but instead it costs more than most multi-asset bridges. And this raises another concern: The Kurve website ( clearly states that "The bridge service fee may be updated over time to reflect operational needs. Any adjustments will be published through KURVE documentation and communication channels.". So what if tomorrow they decide to increase the fee to 2%? 5%? 90%? All holders of wrapped Kaspa on Kasplex will be stranded, forced to pay the increased cost if they ever want their Kaspa unwrapped. This is an incredible example of why trusting a closed-sourced mainnet is such a dangerous and terrible idea, and more so for a fully centralized network (where the public is not even given access to closed-sourced node binaries, but instead the same group of people is running all nodes) like Kasplex. Be careful, and don't give anyone you wouldn't trust with the cash hidden in your mattress the ability to hold your funds hostage.
1.68萬
233
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。