MSTR is not going to be the LUNA of this cycle unless BTC itself goes to zero somehow (possible, I suppose, but about as likely as JPM going bankrupt at this point). Complete demolition of MSTR would require BTC losses to the point that their total stack is worth less than the outstanding debt. That's a catastrophic number for BTC. That doesn't mean it can't get pretty bad, though. Taking on debt exposes you to downside volatility. It's great on the way up, but exceptionally painful on the way down. And crypto always has drawdowns. To me, this was the argument to just own an ETF like IBIT, FBTC, HODL, etc. and just forget it about it. MSTR could get forced out of the trade via blowing up, but they also could be forced to de-lever at bad prices that will greatly impair future returns (vastly more likely, in fact), which means it's just an ETF with stratospherically higher "fees" in the form of having to pay off all the debt holders. Put differently: unless you think Saylor is a vastly above average hedge fund manager who can time markets, just own the ETF and stop overcomplicating shit. This is crypto, thus everyone can't stop using perps with 50x leverage and getting liquidated like retards, so this will never happen. However, to say it again, just buy the ETF and chill if you are a BTC believer and want it in equity form factor.
I just wish, hope, and pray that MSTR is not the LUNA of this cycle. Another public, but this time, Wall Street–retail-entangled death spiral is the last thing this industry needs. Hoping Saylor can pull some Wall Street voodoo magic.
7,841
41
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。