Over the past year, about $12 million has been spent purely on managing LP positions across Uniswap v3, Balancer and Curve. It is a hidden tax most LPs never account for🧵
The network-level data shows that rebalance count remains consistently high across the year and gas spikes align with periods of volatility, precisely when LPs must act more aggressively. LPs must rebalance more when the market is chaotic and that’s exactly when cost is highest.
Each LP interaction burns ~$3 in gas. Sounds trivial, until you repeat it 70 times a year. The average LP now leaks ~$197 annually just to rebalance. It creates a compounding drag on performance, especially for smaller positions.
When annual gas spend is expressed as a percentage of LP capital, smaller positions are brutally penalised. At a $5,000 TVL, average gas drag sits around 3-4% per year. This is where “attractive APY” stops being impressive. Average erosion only falls below 0.5% above $50,000 TVL.
Superposition breaks this loop by allowing users to manage positions without paying gas, it removes the structural friction that defines current LP economics.
769
5
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。