On the topic of banks and stablecoins, I've found myself wondering more and more about the role for tokenized deposits.
To start, there is no real definition today for "tokenized deposit," and different bank implementations will likely look different – transaction size limits, KYC requirements, walled gardens vs. partner gardens, etc. But banks from @jpmorgan to @HSBC to @UBS are all working on them.
Do consumers care whether transactions are decentralized? Whether they are build on an open vs. closed protocol? Is decentralization a core payments feature for the mass-market?
Early internet users expected peer-to-peer commerce to disrupt legacy merchants.
Nobody anticipated @Amazon Marketplace.
Will private chains and bank chains end up playing a similar role, dominating blockchain payments volume, while permissionless chains move to the fringe?
If you're a consumer trying to move money from Point A to Point B and JPMD <> PYUSD lets you do that, do you care?

2,142
12
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。

