Is @arbitrumdao_gov Really Safe…?
Previously, during the OAT Committee member election, there was also a case where a candidate bought 20 million ARB voting power on @lobbyfinance . At that time, other ARB holders voted defensively to prevent a potential governance attack.

In this case, Blockful intentionally conducted a “stress test” to expose vulnerabilities in Arbitrum’s governance and clearly stated on the forum that they would voluntarily resign if elected.
The core issue lies in the steady decline of delegated voting power, a problem that was also pointed out in Nethermind’s analysis of Arbitrum governance.
Ultimately, this happens because token holders lack incentives to either vote actively or delegate passively — a structural weakness that can affect not only Arbitrum but any token-based governance system.
Potential solutions could be rewarding governance participation by:
1. Distributing a portion of newly issued tokens
2. Granting priority on txs inclusion
Follow The Ticker is ETH to stay updated on privacy on Ethereum.
The Ticker is ETH team creates content about Ethereum, proudly selected by @OctantApp Epoch 9.
If you like our content, check out TG channel too:
949
3
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。