Can the project $AR be held until the next bull run?? The storage sector's AR is different from $FIL ; AR focuses on "permanent storage". According to AR's early design logic, once data is written, it can theoretically be preserved for a hundred years. This decentralized approach to long-term, even nearly permanent storage is quite rare in traditional centralized systems. On a more realistic level, after observing for the past few years, I've started to feel a bit hesitant about its demand side. As I mentioned before, whether there’s a sufficiently large real market for such products is questionable. From a B2B perspective, if a company genuinely has "extremely important, must be stored long-term" data, they will either build their own system or outsource it to a third party. But the question is, in the eyes of most companies, is AR more reliable or are established systems like Amazon AWS and Google Cloud the go-to? Even if AR has theoretical advantages, I'm a bit uncertain about how big this market can actually get. Looking at it from a B2C perspective, I also have data I want to preserve long-term, but when it comes to choosing a storage method, should I go for local hard drives, traditional cloud, or on-chain? Even if I do use AR, there’s still a bit of psychological burden—like, if the project doesn't receive ongoing maintenance in the future, will it still run smoothly? After reflecting on all this, the concept of permanent storage is indeed beautiful, but in the current environment, the demand may not be as strong as imagined, at least not enough to form a particularly healthy positive cycle. So my stance is probably: light holding, keeping it as a long-term observation target to see if it can bring anything new in the future. #LayerZero10KEthForAave #USIranLongTermBlockade #PowellFinalFOMC