Let's talk about the buying and selling strategy of BELIEVE table: Why I think the bottom-buying band is more suitable for this table As I have already talked about in the large-scale integration post, the catalyst for the rise of this platform comes from the platform/product upgrade/dev revitalisation/pasternak interaction/follow the general rise Among them, the catalyst that can explode is dev big work (such as $kled) / explosive level product update (I think this is very rare, because in order to be active in the community, his function development will also be disassembled and disclosed little by little) / heavy platform (such as $knet $pcule) There is also the possibility of a plate that has just come out and a plate that may be strongly promoted in the future platform The attention received by doing projects, especially those that continue to be done, is far less than that of memes that have just been baked and ignited twice, who wants to see the long article updates that are chirping, and everyone at Apple's Google press conference will also watch a tldr at most This is a disadvantage, so where is the advantage? That is, the core holders of the community will have confidence in the project, which comes from the continuous build and interaction of dev, which means that the decline will not go anywhere, and the profit and loss ratio is on par with excellent memes So I basically don't look at the update of the product, basically sell the main warehouse at the point and leave a little, and then buy it at the point, and there are so many projects, you really don't have a version of the son can buy the future believe faucet and always be able to hold, this judgement experience is much more difficult than the faucet of the bonk platform