Some feedback regarding Lair Finance. I've been using the system for about a day, and here are a few noticeable points I've organized. 1. Portfolio management and reward claim? In the case of @LairFinance, the current portfolio shows assets related to Bera when you click on the wallet in your account. However, the Earn section for rewards is currently marked as coming soon, so it's not clear whether rewards are accumulating. The visibility of rewards is psychologically very important, so even if claims are not possible yet, having visible figures is definitely necessary. For example, in the case of Pendle, most rewards are paid in Pendle, which are then converted and shown as tokens or stablecoins that have entered the Pool. Although there is the hassle of checking prices using an oracle in between, it is very convenient for users as they can intuitively see their earnings, making it very good from a UX perspective. 2. Check the Bera -> iBGT swap ratio I haven't yet found or understood the exact logic, but when I converted 100 Bera to LrBGT on Lair Finance, it converted to about 94.5 LrBGT. Additionally, I received wBERA and LAIR, but I'm not sure if this is due to a poor swap ratio or if it's given as an additional reward. When I go to @KodiakFi, I can see that 100 Bera converts to 98.099 iBGT. There is a slight swap loss, but I can see that it can be converted back to Bera for a similar amount. 3. Differences in the system Looking more closely at the system, the answers start to emerge. First, when converting iBGT directly to LrBGT, the ratio is coming out accurately. iBGT converts at 95.25% wBERA at 2.36% LAIR tokens at 2.38% This means that when minting LrBGT, LAIR tokens are always forcibly swapped. Initially, I thought that LAIR was being airdropped additionally, but that wasn't the case. For people like me who are using the system for the first time, there can be confusing parts, and while it may seem like an additional reward, it turns out to be a forced token swap, which I believe requires sufficient education and notification for users before use. For example, Lair Finance is expected to provide restaking for Injective, but if I am forced to buy LAIR tokens at 2.38% during the restaking process of my $INJ, I probably won't restake even if the APR is high. The reason is that while liquidity for Injective is high, I cannot control the liquidity of Injective at that time for LAIR. Currently, the TVL of Bera can fill itself in Injective, so as liquidity increases, the risk also increases. The protocol design is quite innovative. It forces the purchase of its own tokens when minting restaking tokens, creating automatic demand for them. However, I leave this feedback thinking that this could potentially become a barrier to liquidity inflow in the long term.