Sui is now facing a rare moment, not just about an incident or loss, but about how we choose to protect the users and trust along this chain. Many people are discussing whether Sui will be centralized this time, and it is recommended to read the good article of the owner @thecryptoskanda, which excerpts a paragraph: "As long as decisions are not made by a single entity, but by multiple entities that are not affiliated with each other according to the decision-making process, then this is decentralization. It describes a governance decision-making model, not an abstract "blockchain spirit." The foundation of DeFi is never about high yields or cool narratives, it's about something you put in and worth holding. This governance proposal represents the ability of decentralized coordination: when something goes wrong, can the entire community, builders, and validators stand up together and fix it responsibly? It's not just about a piece of money, it's about a relationship of trust. As a member of the @bucket_protocol team, we interact with real users every day, watching them believe in the Sui ecosystem, participate in the protocol, and stake assets. They're not here to stir up a wave, they're really using it, it's really all in. When these people are at risk, our role is not to be a spectator, but to hold on to the value of the chain. For more ideas, please refer to some thoughts from our founder @damiendotsui: We support this proposal not because we believe in a particular team or individual, but because we believe that the long-term value of a chain comes from the ability to do the right thing at a critical moment. We support all actions that protect user assets, maintain trust, and make the ecosystem more mature. Builders are the enablers, but the ones who really keep the chain alive are those who choose to stand up and protect the community. What we have to do is do both.